JJZolx wrote:
This audiophile forum has been a joke for a long time. And now here
comes Arny. Figures. Like a fly to shit.
I agree completely - many of the regulars on this audiophile forum
would indeed be considered fools on most normal audiophile forums
since we have mostly stopped drinking
JJZolx wrote:
This audiophile forum has been a joke for a long time. And now here
comes Arny. Figures. Like a fly to shit.
If you look at the actual timing of things, what attracted me to this
forum was Archimago's Blog thread about his Internet Blind Test - Linear
versus Minimum Phase
arnyk wrote:
If you look at the actual timing of things, what attracted me to this
forum was Archimago's Blog thread about his Internet Blind Test - Linear
versus Minimum Phase Filters post. If you have been following the
action you will noitice that we share an common interest which is
arnyk wrote:
Is Archimago a pariah around here?
Just as much as anyone else who dares to use evidence-based and
audiophile in the same sentence...
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
arnyk wrote:
Is Archimago a pariah around here?
Julf wrote:
Just as much as anyone else who dares to use evidence-based and
audiophile in the same sentence...
Actually Archimago is more like a hero, since he proves that there is
such a thing as an evidence based audiophile.
What I wonder
ralphpnj wrote:
Actually Archimago is more like a hero, since he proves that there is
such a thing as an evidence based audiophile.
What I wonder is if Archimago's blog continues to get the attention it
so richly deserves will Archimago resist the efforts to co-opt him and
turn his blog
ralphpnj wrote:
Actually Archimago is more like a hero, since he proves that there is
such a thing as an evidence based audiophile.
What I wonder is if Archimago's blog continues to get the attention it
so richly deserves will Archimago resist the efforts to co-opt him and
turn his blog
This audiophile forum has been a joke for a long time. And now here
comes Arny. Figures. Like a fly to shit.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread:
ralphpnj wrote:
Arny - what you will find (and are finding) around here is that the many
us are trying to bring back some respect to the term audiophile. As it
now stands the term audiophile, outside of audiophile circles, is one
of derision and scorn,
I've already found that Audiophile
Many here are reformed Placebophiles I personally heaved a whole snake
nest of audioquest cables in the recycling bin... it felt good . I
choosed not to try to recoup some of the $$$ by selling second hand that
would be to promote this bizarre world view and if do, you have to use a
burner phone
Mnyb wrote:
Many here are reformed Placebophiles I personally heaved a whole snake
nest of audioquest cables in the recycling bin... it felt good . I
choosed not to try to recoup some of the $$$ by selling second hand that
would be to promote this bizarre world view and if do, you have to
doctor_big wrote:
It's the same group - some in fact, some in spirit - from the
rec.audio.high-end days, probably still sitting in their wood-paneled
basements, listening to Ohm speakers and Sansui amps run through zip
cord, because hey - ABX tests obscure any differences that could
SBGK wrote:
sense of humour failure, Julf ?
Yes, I think the people who are compelled to demean people who share
opinions and facts that attack their comfort areas, with statements
like:
It's the same group - some in fact, some in spirit - from the
rec.audio.high-end days, probably still
Julf wrote:
Ah, yes, now we are on familiar ground - if you can't respond to
factual issues, you can at least try to belittle the people you disagree
with.
sense of humour failure, Julf ?
Touch optimisations http://touchsgotrythm.blogspot.co.uk/
And here's a question for these objectivists - Harmon are the only
speaker company, AFAIK, that have done DBTs on their speakers
correlated listener preference with measurements (a set of 70 horizontal
vertical measurements done in an anechoic chamber)
Any self-respecting objectivist would
doctor_big wrote:
. . . Its original purpose is rendered mute.
If we're going to be picky, let's get our language right. I don't think
the intent was to render the purpose -silent- (mute), but to suggest it
was no longer relevant (moot).
http://grammarist.com/usage/moot-mute/
LMS on a
doctor_big wrote:
To some extent I do agree. However the moderators of this forum created
the audiophiles subform specifically so that audiophiles (whatever you
think of them) could discuss their audiophile stuff - power cords, DACS,
amps etc - without having to suffer the ridicule of
doctor_big wrote:
It's an objectivist circle_-*_jerk*-_.. Move along. Nothing to see
here.
Jason
_-*Noun_or_verb?*-_ :p
atb
ronnie
Man in a van's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43627
doctor_big wrote:
To some extent I do agree. However the moderators of this forum created
the audiophiles subform specifically so that audiophiles (whatever you
think of them) could discuss their audiophile stuff - power cords, DACS,
amps etc - without having to suffer the ridicule of
arnyk wrote:
Please notice the winking smiley emoticon: ;-)
That means the post is not to be taken seriously.
Oh, that good then, as I didn't.
In the same vein, I offer,
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/aopentube/
atb
Ronnie.
Man in a van wrote:
Oh, that good then, as I didn't.
In the same vein, I offer,
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/aopentube/
.
A innovative product of a kind that came out in 2002 and appears to have
inspired no sequels.
The report you linked seems to have had the detailed results of
doctor_big wrote:
It's an [ insert something ] circle jerk.. Move along. Nothing to see
here.
Jason
Is this not 95% of treads in any forum especially audioforums , endless
diskussions at full speed to nowhere #128526;
Man in a van wrote:
Jason, I do like your second paragraph, excellent prose! It really has a
flow to it.
Just like to add, that I don't consider myself as an objectivist (I'm
not very clever with technical stuff) and that I do hear differences
between some equipment, but as these
Man in a van wrote:
_-*Noun_or_verb?*-_ :p
atb
ronnie
Verb. Definitely a verb.
Jason
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread:
Mnyb wrote:
Is this not 95% of treads in any forum especially audioforums , endless
diskussions at full speed to nowhere #128526;
To some extent I do agree. However the moderators of this forum created
the audiophiles subform specifically so that audiophiles (whatever you
think of them)
arnyk wrote:
A innovative product of a kind that came out in 2002 and appears to have
inspired no sequels.
I almost picked that board up. Unfortunately, I had had so many
problems with the reliability of Aopen boards over the years that I took
a pass.
Kind of reminndinds you of Luxmans integrated amps with a tube stage
somewhere , the tube was visible trough a small window in the front of
the amp :) was it in the early90's they did that ?
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS
Man in a van wrote:
What is your point?
Have you used these products or just being a shill?
Please explain as I would like to know.
It's an objectivist circle jerk.. Move along. Nothing to see here.
Jason
Here are some-* interesting*- internal noise reduction products for your
PC ;-)
'Efidelity PC SNR enhancment for PCI bus'
arnyk wrote:
Here are some-* interesting*- internal noise reduction products for your
PC ;-)
What is your point?
Have you used these products or just being a shill?
Please explain as I would like to know.
Man in a
No linear supply with rectifier tubes for your pc ? ;)
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3
sub.
Bedroom/Office: Boom
What are the burn in times on these?
LMS Version: 7.9
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - WHS 2011
2x Touch, 3x SB3
bonze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6150
View this thread:
Man in a van wrote:
What is your point?
Please notice the winking smiley emoticon: ;-)
That means the post is not to be taken seriously.
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View
33 matches
Mail list logo
