If anyone is local to the boston area, i'll be glad to lend it to you.
--
totoro
squeezebox 3 - mccormack dna .5 - audio physic tempo 4
totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935
View this
totoro;154491 Wrote:
Did you make sure that you were using the right microphone config file
when you generated your filters? Also, if you look in the directory
where the inguz binary lives, you'll see a config file there. You can
adjust the gain there.
I had to turn the gain up on mine.
CFP;154761 Wrote:
Yes I did make sure to follow the tips you laid out in your initial
post. Curious, did you notice any other improvements when turning up
the gain other than louder sound?
Ah thanks, I did this last night and it has made a huge difference.
Ooops, I really should edit
Alright I got my third (and best) measurement in today. I haven't
gotten a nice, long listening session in yet, but suffice it to say the
difference is palpable.
In a nutshell, I would say the imaging and sound-stage improved fairly
significantly, and a sometimes sibilant high-end has been
CFP;154473 Wrote:
I just did this and the resulting sound seems really muffled with the
left channel seemingly louder than the right. Anyone else get these
results, and if so, how did you solve it?
Did you make sure that you were using the right microphone config file
when you generated you
How hard and fast is this 2ghz proc requirement?
I have a 1.33 ghz athlon machine which I'd like to try this out with.
Is there anything I can do to simulate the load without purchasing the
mic and a/d equipment first?
--
Super-Gonzo
CFP: check that you use the normal.drc from
http://www.inguzaudio.com/RoomCorrection/normal.drc, not the one from
the drc distro.
Super-gonzo: you could try install the plugin and use its EQ settings;
the CPU hit for that is slightly less than when running correction
filters, but in the same
The other option is to record the convoluted wav and than play it trough
your SB3 as you normally would.
--
ackcheng
ackcheng's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=133
View this thread:
stevo;153275 Wrote:
totoro
Nice write up on Inguz room correction system. I just got some new
speakers so I haven't run new sweeps just yet but I know that the
system will benefit. Setting levels when doing the sweeps can be a
little tricky.
Also for those who want more info see:
totoro;153414 Wrote:
I think I might not have set my levels incorrectly, judging by how much
lower in level the music is when equalized vs raw. Would this be an
effect of that?
I don't think the level settings when you record the sweep have any
effect on the volume after equalization,
Thank you for the comments and the links ackcheng! While I wish the
measuring equipment were less expensive, I am seriously considering DRC
as my next upgrade.
--
JohnnyLightOn
JohnnyLightOn's Profile:
JohnnyLightOn;153445 Wrote:
Thank you for the comments and the links ackcheng! While I wish the
measuring equipment were less expensive, I am seriously considering DRC
as my next upgrade.
I just bought a new US-122L on ebay for $138 shipped, a $50 ecm8000, a
$7 microphone cable, and a $20
I quickly browsed the web page and was unclear about requirements.
Does the plugin only run on a Slimserver running on Windows?
Or, does the plugin run on a Linux Slimserver but the tools required to
run the room correction utilities only run on Windows?
Thanks.
-CB
--
ctbarker32
ctbarker32;153470 Wrote:
I quickly browsed the web page and was unclear about requirements.
Does the plugin only run on a Slimserver running on Windows?
Or, does the plugin run on a Linux Slimserver but the tools required to
run the room correction utilities only run on Windows?
totoro;153475 Wrote:
The plugin uses a convolver written using .NET, so it's only windows (at
least for now).
.NET, eh? Presumably that explains why Inguz says it needs a 2GHz CPU.
Has anyone ever seen a Windows port of BRUTEFIR? I've tried Googling
for it, but no luck.
--
cliveb
cliveb;153478 Wrote:
.NET, eh? Presumably that explains why Inguz says it needs a 2GHz CPU.
Has anyone ever seen a Windows port of BRUTEFIR? I've tried Googling
for it, but no luck.
I haven't. You could try the cygwin/mingw route, I suppose. But if
you're using windows, why not use the
As far as I know there's no Windows version of brutefir (which is one
reason I built this in the first place). For linux porting of the
plugin, I did get as far as jotting down a few notes here:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25381
--
inguz
totoro;153481 Wrote:
But if you're using windows, why not use the Inguz convolver?
My Windows server is a 533MHz mini-ITX. If Inguz is correct about
needing 2GHz (which I have no reason to doubt), it's a non-starter. The
whole point of this server is to use as little power as possible, and it
ackcheng;153192 Wrote:
welcome to the world of digital room correction!
Very happy to be here!
--
totoro
_
squeezebox 3 - mccormack dna .5 - audio physic tempo 4
totoro's
totoro
Nice write up on Inguz room correction system. I just got some new
speakers so I haven't run new sweeps just yet but I know that the
system will benefit. Setting levels when doing the sweeps can be a
little tricky.
Also for those who want more info see: http://www.inguzaudio.com/
Stevo
I like the idea of trying this, but have two questions:
- Is it worth doing if I have poor speaker placement? At present I
have monitor speakers spread 17' apart, and my listening position is
much closer to one speaker than the other. My amp doesn't have a
balance control, so I am stuck with a
21 matches
Mail list logo
