Please someone with good headphone/amp verify this possible bug as
described in http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40409
--
sikahr
sikahr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14065
View
sikahr;244043 Wrote:
Please someone with good headphone/amp verify this possible bug as
described in http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40409
Please could you explain why anyone would care about an MP3 containing
a -90dB sine wave? (It's got nothing to do with music - in so many
Because other decoders works correctly and SB3 built-in doesn't, at
least in my opinion. Please listen for Yourself test files. I dont know
for sure what effect this have on normal music. Maybe it is audible,
maybe not, needs additional testing.
--
sikahr
but.. mp3's are lossy.
They are going to have artifacts.
--
snarlydwarf
snarlydwarf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1179
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40411
Yes, why are we splitting hairs about a codec that's broken by design?
MP3s will always have artifacts, even if it's audible under extreme
circumstances with MP3 codec A and inaudible under the same
circumstances (but likely audible under different circumstances) with
MP3 codec B.
Answer: use
but... listen to artifacts introduced by PC decoders, and compare with
artifacts of builtin decoder, it's not same order of magnitude.
Additionally, MAD in 24-bit mode is very similar as source file.
Please listen.
--
sikahr
MP3 != audiophile
In fact, shouldn't MP3 be trapped by a swear filter in the audiophile
forum? ;)
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View this thread:
