i am not an audiophile
i am just a melomane
i posted this versions cause its sounds so natural for the digital
world
I tried almost every OS and compare them all (hated daphile and
Raspberry crap)
if you want to try it , TRY IT!
your UNRELEVANT COMMENTS are unrelevant
but in this forum is
Hello All
I recently update my version of Windows on my music server from 1803 to
1809 (insider previes) and experienced a HUGE increasement in sound
quality
The Sound became improved in every way smooth highs more transparence
tight bass large soundstage
So i dumped my Windows install and
ok guys you are ALL WRIGHT
markolino1972's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67458
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109629
markolino1972 wrote:
> Obviously in mid-fi equipement you will not hear any difference!
markolino1972 wrote:
>
> i suggest you to read about jitter (this can affect digital cables as
> well)
Dismissing my equipment, ears, and intelligence. The first refuge of an
audiophile "believer". I
This being a Squeezebox forum I assume you are running LMS on your
Windows server and streaming to Squeezebox clients. That said, any
difference you hear in sound quality after an OS update is imaginary.
It falls into the same category as "WAV vs. FLAC" or decoding FLAC on
the server vs. at the
DJanGo wrote:
> If you update Windows and experienced something new that has anything to
> do with a Device.
> Most of that time its just another driver.
>
> Instead of sharing your ISO - legal or not is another thing - you just
> have to share your audiodevice details.
i use ethernet
every
LMS sends data to the Transporter under 1809 as it did under 1803.
Please don't waste time with thinking about it.
The long time alone between doing the update lets you forget every
possible difference and can only be imaginary.
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based
If you update Windows and experienced something new that has anything to
do with a Device.
Most of that time its just another driver.
Insteea of sharing your ISO - legal or not is another thing - you just
have to share your audiodevice details.
Apesbrain wrote:
> This being a Squeezebox forum I assume you are running LMS on your
> Windows server and streaming to Squeezebox clients. That said, any
> difference you hear in sound quality after an OS update is imaginary.
>
> It falls into the same category as "WAV vs. FLAC" or decoding
Apesbrain wrote:
> It may or may not be safe, but there's no dearth of people willing to do
> so.
Nonetheless it was nice to have a little sanctuary from the madness.
Alas I am not dedicated enough nor inclined to defend such a small
island of sanity in a vast sea of insanity. Let them have at
ralphpnj wrote:
> It's threads like this that make me really miss arnyk. In other words,
> it appears that it's now safe to drink the kool-aid.
It may or may not be safe, but there's no dearth of people willing to do
so.
Woah i just used his iso and what should i say!
i've printed some picture from me and me had less wrinkles than my
mirror image.
And that has nothing to do that the picture i was using is a bit older.
Now i tested it with a picture from my wife and the same.
But - as he stated - you cant see
12 matches
Mail list logo
