Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-30 Thread sfjro
"Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > So again back to my original question. Why the mention of NFS in the error= > message? Any guesses? It means something unmatched in dcache (or icache) is detected. That is only I can say about ESTALE. As you might know

RE: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-30 Thread Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)
essage? Any guesses? Thank You Haider -Original Message- From: sf...@users.sourceforge.net [mailto:sf...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 7:00 PM To: Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco) Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: request to kn

Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-29 Thread sfjro
"Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > In the meantime I have run into another issue with aufs1 testing which I th= > ought I would give you a heads up on and also request for your help. That = > is while I am trying to reproduce that issue and investigate it

RE: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-29 Thread Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)
Thank You Haider -Original Message- From: sf...@users.sourceforge.net [mailto:sf...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:50 PM To: Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco) Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: request to know i

Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-22 Thread sfjro
"Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > How do I access all release-note-mails from aufs-users ML? For example, - view one of "aufs3 GIT release" on SourceForge - click "View entire thread" at the bottom of a single message, and you can get all same-titled m

Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-22 Thread sfjro
"Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > I not able to access any of the repositories listed in http://aufs.sourcefo= > rge.net/. I tried both set: git URL's and the http URL's I have just tried and succeeded. I'd suggest you to try again. J. R. Okajima ---

RE: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-22 Thread Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)
) Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1 Hello Haider, "Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > - We are using thinking of using aufs version 1 beca

RE: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-22 Thread Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)
[mailto:sf...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 7:39 PM To: Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco) Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1 Hello Haider, "Haider Khan -X (

RE: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-22 Thread Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)
Cisco) Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1 Hello Haider, "Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > - We are using thinking of using aufs version 1 beca

Re: request to know if there are any known serious issues with using aufs 1

2014-04-21 Thread sfjro
Hello Haider, "Haider Khan -X (haidekha - TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED at Cisco)": > - We are using thinking of using aufs version 1 because we are cu= > rrently using Red Hat, CEL 5.5, Linux kernel 2.6.18. It is the only one th= > at is compatible. > Please let us know of any kno