2012/6/17 Jekyll Wu :
> On 2012年06月17日 12:01, Connor Behan wrote:
>>
>> On 16/06/12 08:47 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
>>>
>>> It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are
>>> active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.o
On 2012年06月17日 12:01, Connor Behan wrote:
On 16/06/12 08:47 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are
active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730
[2] https://github.com/m
On 16/06/12 08:47 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote:
> It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are
> active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
>
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730
> [2] https://github.com/mutantturkey/mt/
Did you try to buil
It[1] fails to build, and neither the upstream[2] nor the maintain are
active. So I don't see much value of keeping that package on AUR.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36730
[2] https://github.com/mutantturkey/mt/
Am 16.06.2012 18:57, schrieb Kwpolska:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
wrote:
As the software is Licensed under MIT license you do not have to copy
the COPYING file into the package. You only need to copy the COPYING
file if you set license=('custom: foobar'), but if the lic
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:03:14 -0400
"Jason St. John" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please remove or merge puddletag-svn[1] into puddletag-hg[2]. The
> maintainer of [1] stated that the puddletag developers switched from
> SVN to Mercurial.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45788
> [2] http
Hello,
Please remove or merge puddletag-svn[1] into puddletag-hg[2]. The
maintainer of [1] stated that the puddletag developers switched from
SVN to Mercurial.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45788
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56050
Thanks!
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara
wrote:
> As the software is Licensed under MIT license you do not have to copy
> the COPYING file into the package. You only need to copy the COPYING
> file if you set license=('custom: foobar'), but if the license is one of
> the licenses includ
Op zaterdag 16 juni 2012 00:06:51 schreef rafael ff1:
> ristretto-mod [1] provides a feature that was added to Ristretto a
> lng time ago. Even the maintainer abandoned it. So, please delete.
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25985
nirwana is waiting
gone
thx
--Ike
As the software is Licensed under MIT license you do not have to copy
the COPYING file into the package. You only need to copy the COPYING
file if you set license=('custom: foobar'), but if the license is one of
the licenses included in [core]/licenses (is even in base group) package
license=('lice
Its been a month we have nothing but spam from him. Can somebody take the
proper actions please?
On Jun 16, 2012, at 4:36 AM, Jagmjp Janpgm
wrote:
> href="http://dallidata.da.funpic.de/bravebay/Darren_Wood95/";>http://dallidata.da.funpic.de/bravebay/Darren_Wood95/
>
On 16 June 2012 14:46, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>> >> * ${srcdir}, ${pkgdir}
>> >
>> > I'm not sure I understand.
>> > Should I remove all uses of these variables?
>> > I assumed they're set implicitly when user runs makepkg -s
>>
>> Nope. In your code, you use $srcdir. When you should use ${srcdi
> >> * ${srcdir}, ${pkgdir}
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand.
> > Should I remove all uses of these variables?
> > I assumed they're set implicitly when user runs makepkg -s
>
> Nope. In your code, you use $srcdir. When you should use ${srcdir}.
> See the difference? The braces are import
On 16 June 2012 14:19, Kwpolska wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 16 June 2012 07:56, Kwpolska wrote:
>>>
>>> * ${srcdir}, ${pkgdir}
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand.
>> Should I remove all uses of these variables?
>> I assumed they're set implicitly when user
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 16 June 2012 07:56, Kwpolska wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>>
>>> I have created first version of proj-svn package for PROJ.4, a cartographic
>>> projections library hosted at http://proj.osgeo.org
>
On 16 June 2012 07:56, Kwpolska wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I have created first version of proj-svn package for PROJ.4, a cartographic
>> projections library hosted at http://proj.osgeo.org
>>
>> I attached two files, PKGBUILD and ChangeLog.
>> I'd like
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 4 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
17 matches
Mail list logo
