Re: [aur-general] grass7-svn -> grass70-svn merge req and a votes merge question

2014-02-26 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 18:51:33 Maciej Sieczka wrote: > Dear AUR admins, > > Could you merge grass7-svn [1] into grass70-svn [2]? Preserving the > votes please, if that is possible. Merged. > BTW, I guess there were some votes with grass-geos [3] and grass-trunk > [4]. Those were merged

Re: [aur-general] merge pms-git into np1-mps-git

2014-02-26 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 02/26/14 at 05:33pm, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > Hey, > > I'd like to request for pms-git[1] to be merged into np1-mps-git[2] due > to upstream rename. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pms-git/ > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/np1-mps-git/ > > -- > Sincerely, > Johannes L

Re: [aur-general] delete request mingw-w64-testsuite

2014-02-26 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 22:53:41 xantares 09 wrote: > hi, > could my package be removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-testsuite/ > it's more a test package than an actual package. > xan. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [aur-general] Rename request; {python-,}pyprof2calltree

2014-02-26 Thread Doug Newgard
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:19:05 +0100 > From: m...@the-compiler.org > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: [aur-general] Rename request; {python-,}pyprof2calltree > > Hi, > > I just picked up python-pyprof2calltree[1] which was orphaned. Since > it's a

[aur-general] Rename request; {python-,}pyprof2calltree

2014-02-26 Thread Florian Bruhin
Hi, I just picked up python-pyprof2calltree[1] which was orphaned. Since it's a tool and not a library, it shouldn't have the python- prefix. Can someone please rename it? Thanks. Florian [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyprof2calltree/ -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html ma

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

2014-02-26 Thread BlissSam
在 2014-2-27，7:23，"Maxime Gauduin" 写道： > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Rob Til Freedmen > wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche >> > wrote: >> > >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ >> >> >> >>

[aur-general] Disownment Request: ingen-svn and related packages

2014-02-26 Thread prettyvanilla
Hi, I tried reaching speps 2 weeks ago via email (quoted below), so I hope he either reads it here or someone can disown the following packages for me. Most of them are marked out-of-date for a while and haven't been updated to current standards (including lilv-svn, which I now realize is owned by

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

2014-02-26 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Rob Til Freedmen < rob.til.freed...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Maxime Gauduin > wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche >wrote: > > > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ > >> > >> Appears to be the same

[aur-general] delete request mingw-w64-testsuite

2014-02-26 Thread xantares 09
hi, could my package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-testsuite/ it's more a test package than an actual package. xan.

Re: [aur-general] rc candidates

2014-02-26 Thread Daniel Micay
On 26/02/14 03:37 PM, Aaron Mueller wrote: > Hi! > > I maintain some AUR packages and I am in doubt if I should update packages on > rc > candidates. In my special case, the package "worker" is on the stable version > 3.3.0. This is the version which is linked on the website. But today the > aut

[aur-general] rc candidates

2014-02-26 Thread Aaron Mueller
Hi! I maintain some AUR packages and I am in doubt if I should update packages on rc candidates. In my special case, the package "worker" is on the stable version 3.3.0. This is the version which is linked on the website. But today the author announce the version 3.3.3rc1 and uploaded it. Should I

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

2014-02-26 Thread Rob Til Freedmen
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ >> >> Appears to be the same packaged data as >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't >> build prope

[aur-general] grass7-svn -> grass70-svn merge req and a votes merge question

2014-02-26 Thread Maciej Sieczka
Dear AUR admins, Could you merge grass7-svn [1] into grass70-svn [2]? Preserving the votes please, if that is possible. BTW, I guess there were some votes with grass-geos [3] and grass-trunk [4]. Those were merged into grass64 [5] and grass70-svn [2], respectively, but there was no increase

[aur-general] merge pms-git into np1-mps-git

2014-02-26 Thread Johannes Löthberg
Hey, I'd like to request for pms-git[1] to be merged into np1-mps-git[2] due to upstream rename. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pms-git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/np1-mps-git/ -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpkAmhos_iwc.pgp Description: PGP sign

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-02-26 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days