* Ralf Mardorf info.mard...@rocketmail.com (Sun, 31 May 2015 13:52:04
+0200):
I have to revise my claim it _absolutely_ doesn't belong to the
comments. I guess it's ok to ask some usage questions by a comment
too, but as already pointed out, less people might notice a comment
and to many usage
On Sun, 31 May 2015 at 20:55:17, Duru Can Celasun wrote:
[...]
Not a major concern, but will it be possible to merge comments / votes
/ flags from the old AUR instance?
What do you mean by merge comments? Current package comments and votes
can be retained, i.e. merged into the new database
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Lukas Fleischer
lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, 31 May 2015 at 20:55:17, Duru Can Celasun wrote:
[...]
Not a major concern, but will it be possible to merge comments / votes
/ flags from the old AUR instance?
What do you mean by merge comments?
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Ralf Mardorf
info.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
$ cat .gtkrc-2.0
# Auto-written by gtk2_prefs. Do not edit.
gtk-theme-name = Adwaita
style user-font
{
font_name=FreeSans 12
}
widget_class * style user-font
Try replacing the file with the
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Lukas Fleischer
lfleisc...@archlinux.org wrote:
The original thread is too cluttered already so I decided to submit the
second version in a separate thread. The only real change is that we
decided to not make aur.archlinux.org a read-only archive such that
The original thread is too cluttered already so I decided to submit the
second version in a separate thread. The only real change is that we
decided to not make aur.archlinux.org a read-only archive such that
users still get updates during the transition period (if AUR package
maintainers decide
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 14 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14
* Ralf Mardorf info.mard...@rocketmail.com [2015-05-31 10:46:59 +0200]:
On Sat, 30 May 2015 23:26:21 +0200, Marcel Korpel wrote:
* Ralf Mardorf (Sat, 30 May 2015 22:17:10 +0200):
the font size of the palemoon menu bar is smaller, than the font
size other gtk2 apps are using.
[…]
On Sat, 30 May 2015 23:26:21 +0200, Marcel Korpel wrote:
* Ralf Mardorf (Sat, 30 May 2015 22:17:10 +0200):
the font size of the palemoon menu bar is smaller, than the font
size other gtk2 apps are using.
[…]
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/palemoon/
Why not ask there, in the comments?
On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:33:36 +0200, Florian Bruhin wrote:
* Ralf Mardorf info.mard...@rocketmail.com [2015-05-31 10:46:59
+0200]:
On Sat, 30 May 2015 23:26:21 +0200, Marcel Korpel wrote:
* Ralf Mardorf (Sat, 30 May 2015 22:17:10 +0200):
the font size of the palemoon menu bar is smaller, than
* Ralf Mardorf info.mard...@rocketmail.com [2015-05-31 13:52:04 +0200]:
I have to revise my claim it _absolutely_ doesn't belong to the
comments. I guess it's ok to ask some usage questions by a comment too,
but as already pointed out, less people might notice a comment and to
many usage
11 matches
Mail list logo
