Re: [aur-general] Deletion of sxiv-cdown-git

2020-09-13 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 13 Sep 2020 19:03 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Perhaps there should be a general discussion about how to handle the > proliferation of suckless.org software forks, and what constitutes > uniqueness. My wild idea is that maybe each package could enable their own mini-aur

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of sxiv-cdown-git

2020-09-13 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 9/13/20 6:44 AM, Chris Down wrote: > Hi there, > > It seems this morning sxiv-cdown-git was deleted. It exists as a (small) > fork from sxiv with features geared towards using it as a photo manager > which Bert has indicated are different from his goals in mainline, not > merely a set of

[aur-general] Deletion of sxiv-cdown-git

2020-09-13 Thread Chris Down via aur-general
Hi there, It seems this morning sxiv-cdown-git was deleted. It exists as a (small) fork from sxiv with features geared towards using it as a photo manager which Bert has indicated are different from his goals in mainline, not merely a set of config options or whatever. I assume Eli deleted it