On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:57:52 -0400
Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> You are right that I don't know what 'out of state' or 'out of date' or
> 'out of whatever' is. All I know is that I suddenly lost the ownership and
> will have to change my cluster maintenance code tomorrow.
>
> In
You are right that I don't know what 'out of state' or 'out of date' or
'out of whatever' is. All I know is that I suddenly lost the ownership and
will have to change my cluster maintenance code tomorrow.
In terms of pkgver or pkgbuild. Now you said nobody cares about pigver,
guess who said
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:38:02 -0400
Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> I actually did read your email. You said I cannot get a simple thing such
> as pkgver right.
>
> Let me explain to you, from your point of view, you certainly want to have
> some rule or guideline to make all the package
I actually did read your email. You said I cannot get a simple thing such
as pkgver right.
Let me explain to you, from your point of view, you certainly want to have
some rule or guideline to make all the package has the same standard. That
is understandable and it is what make Arch Linux
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:30:11 -0400
Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your reply! I commented on the package hoping the new
> maintainer can return the maintainer to me.
>
> But I am willing to answer your question.
>
> A pull request needs a lot of effort to check. The
Thanks a lot for your reply! I commented on the package hoping the new
maintainer can return the maintainer to me.
But I am willing to answer your question.
A pull request needs a lot of effort to check. The pull request changed a
lot of files and it is not that easy to see if the change is not
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 20:01:45 -0400
Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> The comments were sent to me indeed. However, I didn't receive any email
> notification about the package is marked as out of state.
And what in the world does "out of state" even mean? Of course there's no
notification
The comments were sent to me indeed. However, I didn't receive any email
notification about the package is marked as out of state.
The comment is just a simple 'bad taste' without any link or other advice.
The commenter is not a trusted user either and thus I won't simply accept
the pull request
On 13/10/2020 01.26, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
Hi Mahong,
> Somebody pointed me to your reply in the list. I didn't even know that
> the request in the AUR request system was sent to this email list, nor I
> know such an email list existed.
The email to this list is sent in _addition_
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:26:07 -0400
Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> Hi Freswa,
>
> Somebody pointed me to your reply in the list. I didn't even know that
> the request in the AUR request system was sent to this email list, nor I
> know such an email list existed.
>
> I agree that you
Hi Freswa,
Somebody pointed me to your reply in the list. I didn't even know that
the request in the AUR request system was sent to this email list, nor I
know such an email list existed.
I agree that you think you already gave enough explanation from your
point of view. However, please
On 12/10/2020 22.40, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> Dear AUR administrator,
Hi Manhong,
> Can you please change me back to the maintainer of the AUR package SGE?
>
> This saturday I got two emails. One is user "freswa" disowned this
> package, and then 19 minutes later, another email
On 10/12/20 4:40 PM, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> Dear AUR administrator,
>
> Can you please change me back to the maintainer of the AUR package SGE?
>
> This saturday I got two emails. One is user "freswa" disowned this
> package, and then 19 minutes later, another email said this
Dear AUR administrator,
Can you please change me back to the maintainer of the AUR package SGE?
This saturday I got two emails. One is user "freswa" disowned this
package, and then 19 minutes later, another email said this package was
adopted. When I got the two emails, it was already too
14 matches
Mail list logo
