Re: [aur-general] TU application: Daurnimator

On 12/17/18 1:23 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via aur-general wrote: > And I stand by my opinion. It's ridiculous to think that one person, > even if member of GitHub organization (which may or may not mean > anything), can single-handedly affect decision of either project. It's > difficult even here

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Feb 28, 2018 08:40, "Eli Schwartz via aur-general" < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: On 02/21/2018 07:06 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Anyway, the voting period has now officially begun, so cast your votes > everyone! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=104 Voting period is over, and the results

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 04:15 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > I thought the idea here was to see what you are interested in, not what > I'm interested in. :p True, true. The packaging scene right now is both a blessing and a curse: very few packages exist that don't have a maintainer, but at the

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:14 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Not as a general rule, no, but if the forum mods are feeling nice then > the forum software does allow it. :) > > Likewise, Bluewind can edit the bugtracker database. > > Perks of being friendly with the people in charge. :D Heh,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 06:52 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Brad, please create a new AUR account, as you will need one to interact > with the AUR for various TU duties if you are re-elected. (This is > independent of whether you maintain *any* packages in the AUR, which I > hope you will

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

chris.rebisc...@archlinux.org> wrote: Well, you could at least starting signing your mails with the next email, even if it is a new GPG key. It's something that we expect from TU-Applicants.. and I see no reason why you should excluded from this expectation. That maybe sounds a little bit harsh,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Do you still have access to your bug tracker account? Can you update your email address here? https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/7923 Yes I do. I've just gone ahead and updated my bug tracker account to reflect this, thank you. wrote: [...] is not able to sign his

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

> It's been around in some incarnation since 2007, and you have a > filled-in profile at > https://www.archlinux.org/people/trusted-user-fellows/#bfanella > > So I assumed you must have at one point had access to it, even if > it's > been long enough that you have forgotten and/or lost track --

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Do you still have access to your archweb account? If so, you could update that with your GPG key/new email address and post a confirmation email signed with that key to this thread. :D I don't believe Archweb was even active when I was a TU, sadly. :( I suppose the worst-case scenario would

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

> * The originally sent email does not match the email Brad applied > with > in 2010. [1] > * There is no GPG signature, neither on the current application or > the > 2010 application, as to remove doubts. > * The "itsbrad212" account is no longer present on AUR. > * The website on the

[aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Hi all, Perhaps this is a bit unorthodox, but in 2011 I resigned from my post as a TU for personal and time-related reasons [1]. Coming up on almost 7 years later, I'm still an avid Arch user, and have struck a balance in my life where I'm much more capable of contributing to open-source projects