I'm the maintainer of the following packages and they should be
deleted as they are either obsolete or have dead upstreams.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/katchtv/ (Dead upstream)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmake-svn/ (Dead upstream)
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Martin Wimpress martin+a...@flexion.org wrote:
Hi,
On 09/01/14 13:01, D. Can Celasun wrote:
I'm the maintainer of the following packages and they should be
deleted as they are either obsolete or have dead upstreams.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/katchtv
Greetings,
I'm the maintainer of limbo [1] and the maintainer of limbo_wine [2]
approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me.
Can someone please merge both packages under the name limbo but using the
tarball and having the maintainer of limbo_wine?
Thanks,
Can
[1]
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Limao Luo luoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Now you just need to have the limbo_wine maintainer (mirandir) change
pkgname=limbo_wine to pkgname=limbo and reupload, and the TU's can
merge limbo_wine into limbo afterwards.
Allright, I've informed the maintainer.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Wallace danielwall...@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:08:36PM +0200, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Wallace
danielwall...@gtmanfred.com
wrote:
D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote:
Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:46:08 schreef D. Can Celasun:
Wow, Déją vu! In the past another TU asked me the exact same question
and it was decided that if the maintainer didn't update any of his
packages for a long
Hi,
Can someone please orphan rabbitvcs-thunar [1] and thunarx-python[2] ?
The maintainer hasn't updated any of his packages in over a year and
there are updated PKGBUILDs in the comments. I'd like to maintain
them.
Thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34590
[2]
ahead and orphan the packages.
Thanks!
[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016307.html
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:36:16 schreef D. Can Celasun:
Hi,
Can someone please orphan rabbitvcs-thunar
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote:
Op zondag 15 juli 2012 21:46:08 schreef D. Can Celasun:
Wow, Déjà vu! In the past another TU asked me the exact same question
and it was decided that if the maintainer didn't update any of his
packages for a long time
Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any
of his packages since January. I have an updated PKGBUILD and I'm willing
to maintain it.
Thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45651
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 29/10/11 13:18, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any
of his packages since January. I have an updated PKGBUILD and I'm willing
to maintain it.
Thanks.
[1
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 29/10/11 13:18, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Can someone please orphan phpstorm [1]? The maintainer hasn't updated any
of his packages since
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300
schrieb D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com:
Uhm.. if there are no further objections, can someone please go ahead
and orphan this?
As Jelle already asked you to do this, you
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:43:32AM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de
wrote:
Am Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:22:10 +0300
schrieb D. Can Celasun dcela
Hi TUs,
Can someone please orphan iscan-plugin-gt-x770 [1]. The maintainer hasn't
updated the package in over 2 years. I have an up-to-date PKGBUILD and I'm
wiling to maintain it.
Thanks.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29170
Can someone please delete gtk3-engine-unico [1]? I've uploaded it without
checking AUR first. The same package exists under gtk-engine-unico [2].
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50016
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49242
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 17:07, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
If this is not technically possible (which is kinda hard to believe), it
should be implemented.
You should send in a patch that would allow TUs
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.comwrote:
I like both the idea of it being possible to change the names of
packages and the patch.
But, what about dependencies? Should they be left dangling?
- Alexander Rødseth
I'm glad the patch looks fine, though I'm not
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 05:32, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
I like both the idea of it being possible to change the names of
packages and the patch.
But, what about dependencies? Should they be left
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm glad the patch looks fine, though I'm not sure I understand the issue
about dependencies?
Well, AUR packages can depend on other AUR packages. If an AUR package
is renamed which is itself a dependency, packages
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems reasonable. One question: What user should the automatic
comment
belong to? Is there something like a pseudo user?
The best choice
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 June 2011 16:04, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 05:32, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com
wrote
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 June 2011 17:23, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 June 2011 17:03, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
Possible, but is it really necessary? How is this different than the
original
2011/6/1 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
Possible, but is it really necessary? How is this different than the
original approach (TU changes the name, maintainer updates the PKGBUILD)
?
With this approach it is much easier to implement a transition period
when the other
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Jakob Gruber jakob.gru...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 05:26 PM, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Actually, it is still possible. Here's how it'd work:
- TU changes package name from foo to bar.
- This automatically triggers an out-of-date notification
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 1 June 2011 23:36, Jakob Gruber jakob.gru...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 05:26 PM, D. Can Celasun wrote:
Actually, it is still possible. Here's how it'd work:
- TU changes package name from foo to bar
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:13:09PM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm glad the patch looks fine, though I'm not sure I understand the
issue
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
I think renaming a package should be slightly cumbersome, and not that
easy.
Just one rename has the potential to create work for dozens of package
maintainers because of dependency issues.
Let's say that maintainers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.dewrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:47:16PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 1 June 2011 16:04, D. Can Celasun dcela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com
wrote
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:53 PM, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us
wrote:
I maintain the kernel26-ck in the AUR. Once the devs decide on a new
name for the kernel package based on the upcoming 3.0 release,
I've been going through Firefox stuff on AUR and noticed there are a lot of
ancient/obsolete/orphaned/etc. packages. I think the following should be
deleted, just to keep AUR clean.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24912
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24958
31 matches
Mail list logo
