On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:00:44 +0100
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:29 -0500
schrieb Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 01:19:46PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
You see how well that worked with the wall in
Germany.
You
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:06:02 -0600
Mike Bedwell pcally...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/23/2011 09:10 PM, Jonathan Conder wrote:
On 24 October 2011 01:42, Dieter Plaetinckdie...@plaetinck.be
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:10:48 +1300
Jonathan Conderjonno.con...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi TUs,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:50:31 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
I'd like to see nexuiz replaced by xonotic in [community]. Problem is
that nexuiz is still a fairly popular package despite being dead
upstream. xonotic devs recommend dropping nexuiz in favor of xonotic.
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:43:57 +0200
Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am 21.10.2011 15:57, schrieb Sergej Pupykin:
At Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:43:12 -0300,
Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org wrote:
And.. Sergej, please try to focus on the problem that brings
having huge packages and
Thanks for your work Loui.
Dieter
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:20:53 +0200
Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, keenerd keen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/12/11, François Boulogne boulogn...@gmail.com wrote:
So make it world-readable.
I am entirely against any sort of closed private ML. Private but
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:47:50 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.8.0. For a
short list of changes, read [1].
Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2].
[1]
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:37:18 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:08:05AM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
what's the reasoning behind no longer showing all files in the
source package? I found this feature quite useful.
There were several
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:19:08 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Moreover, I've heard of some encoding issues with users just
copy-pasting files from the AUR frontend.
this is kindof vague. encoding issues... issues at AUR side or
client side? if the former, that
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
The only issue that might affect the end users as well is ZIP bombs.
Most users will probably notice such a thing before it is entirely
extracted, just interrupt tar(1)/gzip(1) and send a removal request to
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:35:33 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:46:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
The only issue that might affect the end users
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:21:41 -0500
Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
Voila!
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22991?project=2
yeay. always nice when a certain discussion or train of thought (pun
intended, esp. for Loui) leads to an unforseen new improvement :)
Dieter
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:08:27 +1000
Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 19/01/11 15:19, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Okay everyone, every time I ask I get a different answer. According
to Dziedzic and Allan 'glibc' does *not* belong in 'depends'. Also
Dziedzic votes that *no* package in 'base'
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:20:58 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 19.01.2011 08:08, schrieb Allan McRae:
If we want to be really pedantic about dependencies, we should list
_ALL_ dependencies and not remove the ones that are dependencies of
dependencies.
Why don't we just
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:08:03 +1000
Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 21/12/10 15:53, Xyne wrote:
On 2010-12-21 12:14 +0800 (51:2)
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 13:22 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
My view is that there is no need for informational post_install or
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:44:29 -0600
Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-11 03:15:36
+0100:
This is the official thread of the Arch holiday madness!
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:12:48 +0800
Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:07 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-10 05:01:35
+0100:
rxvt-unicode in extra has 256 color support built with it which
made the deleted
Would it make sense to have a little overview of space
consumers on the AUR webpage?
in only little time we can probably make something useful (and cache
the results)
at the very least something that warns when the disk is full.
Btw, about 4.5GB of the 70GB in use by releng (2009.08 and 2010.05
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:14:55 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
Btw, about 4.5GB of the 70GB in use by releng (2009.08 and 2010.05
releases), but Thomas mentioned he wanted to migrate releng to another
machine, which is probably a good idea.
Dieter
oops, forgot a dir
3.9G
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:21:16 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
From the first dir, I just cleaned up about 3.5GB
So now 16GB is available on /
Dieter
I have now removed all archiso testbuilds, which gains another 2GB.
(until we start build new ones of course B-)
I could
Btw, there is a dude who's working on a git-backend-based AUR.
pretty c^w very ambitious project, if you're interested in the topic,
check him out.
I was pretty sure he had a thread on the community contributions
section of the forums, and i know myself and louipc have made posts in
the thread,
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:33:17 -0500
Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
Could there be a possibility of having something similar to USE flags
for AUR?
We have something similar: copy the pkgbuild, change configure option.
done.
I also don't like the proposed interactiveness and checking the
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:34:53 +0200
Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Unless, of course, you plan to include an animated paperclip that asks
questions such as I see that you have GTK installed. Would you like
to enable a graphical user interface? and I see that your master
boot record contains
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22101
the branch is no more.
and making a package for each branch doesn't seem to be such a good
idea anyway.
Dieter
just wondering.
afaik tools such as yaourt, when you search a package, they will search
for http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=packagename and parse the
output, right?
wouldn't it make sense to have a daily crontab on the aur server that
generates a file which contains all packages (maybe
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:46:34 -0500
Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:22, Sebastian Nowicki seb...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would make more sense to expand upon the RPC and use a client
which caches. Initially any queries might be slower, but the second
time
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:04:27 +0100
Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
any objections.
uhm...I know my English is very bad, but I think objection must be
singular, not plural.
can be more than one objection. two objections :D
Is there any objection? - any objection?
Are there any
take care
Hi guys.
For the uzbl project (http://www.uzbl.org/) I maintain 2 packages in
AUR - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=uzbl -
and I'm involved in the upstream as well
Since this program is becoming quite popular, I thought it would make
sense to start maintaining this in community/extra.
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:01:40 +0100
Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello,
I think more important than the form the sources are hosted (git or
tarball) is if the program is to be considered stable. To me a
program is stable if new versions do only deliver bug fixes and minor
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:08:52 +0100
Thorsten Töpper atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Thanks everyone. :-)
Andrea: That's strange if you searched for the user name, else if you
searched for my real name, I previously wrote my last name with
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:59:45 -0400
Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 19:31, Loui Changlouipc@gmail.com wrote:
Hey everyone.
I've disabled all community packages in the AUR.
There will still be a few artifacts remaining in the interface which
will be
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:51:38 -0700
Giovanni Scafora giova...@archlinux.org wrote:
2009/7/31, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com:
I've been speaking to Laszlo over the past month and the impression that
I get is that he really doesn't understand boundaries when it comes to
communication. This
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:27:33 +0400
Dmitry Ostasevich ostasev...@gmail.com wrote:
Just have compiled it successfully (i686)
can you do an ldd on the resulting binary (binaries) ?
Dieter
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:16:46 +0200
Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Dieter Plaetinck schrieb:
Hi,
did anyone manage to get yafc to compile?
( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=298 )
I tried playing with the configure options and doing ./autogen.sh but i
always
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:26:11 +0200
Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello,
did you remove the src dir before recompiling?
I used the following PKGBUILD under x86_64.
# Contributor: Roman Porizka ar...@beer.cz
pkgname=yafc
pkgver=1.1.1
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=yet another ftp
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:52:39 +0200
Henning Garus henning.ga...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Henning
Garushenning.ga...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Henning
Garushenning.ga...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Dieter
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:46:50 +0300
Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Andrea Scarpinoand...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On 06/07/2009, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
Email sent.
LOL. we did this AGAIN!! :D
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:15:05 +1930
Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM, bardoilba...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/6 Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be:
Surely you can. use e-mail to lock a mutex.
That's the volleyball technique. The first that shouts
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21526
(this package is maintained in extra)
Thanks,
Dieter
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:27:19 -0400
Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 13:10, Mathias Burén mathias.bu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oh my!
2009/4/7 Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Mathias Burén
mathias.bu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:29:41 +
Laurie Clark-Michalek bluepepp...@archlinux.us wrote:
I was planning to use a little .install file:
post_install() {
gtk-update-icon-cache -f /usr/share/icons/hicolor
}
fwiw, you could have a look at the liferea package (.install file). it
also does
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:59:45 +0100
Markus Heuser mheu...@mi.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hey,
I don't think it make any difference. Why companies should care
about Arch or it's petition?
Because we are the users and we have paid for their cards! We do have
the right to demand a working
Sebastian Nowicki wrote:
On 22/12/2008, at 2:14 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
If we split them, then we (being devs and TUs) need to decide
whether the community packages get shown on the main Arch package
page or are kept separate.
Considering many people have asked for this already, I'd say it
Hi, I own the package aif-blockdevicerefactor-git
It was named after a specific branch, but since the branch has been
merged into master and then deleted this package doesn't, and will never
work anymore.
Can it be deleted?
Sorry for bothering you with this, when I created it I didn't realize
45 matches
Mail list logo
