Re: [aur-general] Suspicious spam account

2013-05-23 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Aaron t0ne...@causal.ca wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2013 01:09:37 -0400 Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, GSC xgd...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JOYOAUTO/ Spam here:

Re: [aur-general] AsciiDoc version of the TU bylaws -- voting period

2012-11-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: Hi, Trusted Users! The discussion period has ended, please cast your votes on [1]. The discussion can be found on [2]. Please note that this vote is only about converting the bylaws to AsciiDoc [3], [4]; there

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Felix Yan - results

2012-11-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 2 novembre 2012 09:10:47 Bartłomiej Piotrowski a écrit : The vote for Felix' application is over. Yes: 10 No: 4 Abstain: 7 Total: 21 Active TUs: 32 Ioni states that

[aur-general] Remove user/block IP

2012-06-20 Thread Ronald van Haren
Not sure who is in charge of this nowadays... (I don't think I can but maybe I'm missing something) Please remove user testificate from AUR and all his package/posts. Also block his IP if you can. The user is spamming the AUR. Thanks. Ronald

Re: [aur-general] Recent activities of user 'testificate'

2012-06-20 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Karol Blazewicz karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote: This user seems to be spamming the AUR comments with some gibberish (attempt at hacking?). An example: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18909 [0;0H [4m [5m [97;107m [8m (0 [2J The content seems to be

Re: [aur-general] Remove Request: wxgtk-wout-gconf

2012-06-20 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:34 PM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: please. remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54033 no need anymore. (wxgtk2.9 from Community no need gconf) greetings Done, thanks. Ronald

[aur-general] [TU] Emesene update needed

2011-11-25 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hi guys, As I'm on holiday without computer and mostly internet can someone take care of updating emesene as I requested two weeks ago. The old version doesn't work anymore due to server side changes. Thanks. Ronald Op 22 nov. 2011 15:39 schreef Hi Ronald, MrElendig told me that would be

[aur-general] [away] November 12th - December 3rd

2011-11-11 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hi all, I'm on vacation for the next three weeks (starting from now + a few hours). Perhaps one of you guys (devs/TUs) can take care of some things: - move dhcpcd to [core] when it has the required i686 signoffs - upgrade emesene to some unofficial version they have around (microsoft changed the

Re: [aur-general] Lost my password for aur.archlinux.org unsure which emailadress I subscribed

2011-10-21 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Erik Wesselius e...@corporateeurope.org wrote: Hi there, I lost my password for aur.archlinux.org and I am not sure with which email adress I subscribed. My username is erikwesselius Thanks for your help. Erik Wesselius -- email:  

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2011-09-03 Thread Ronald van Haren
Op 3 sep. 2011 18:14 schreef Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com het volgende: Hello, My name is Alexander Rødseth. I'm from Oslo, Norway, am 29 years old for two more months and have been using Arch for a couple of years. My first taste of Linux was a brief acquaintance with Red Hat over a

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

2011-09-03 Thread Ronald van Haren
Op 31 aug. 2011 03:11 schreef Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com het volgende: Hello everyone! I haven't been very involved with the AUR for a long while, and I don't really see that changing much. Since I only have a few packages I think it's time for me to resign as a TU. I may still throw a

Re: [aur-general] [away] 10-14 August

2011-08-15 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'll be in Sweden for a short family visit between tonight and Sunday evening. I don't bring my laptop so I won't be able to do any packaging stuff. Grub is moved to [core], meaning that there are no critical

[aur-general] [away] 10-14 August

2011-08-10 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hi all, I'll be in Sweden for a short family visit between tonight and Sunday evening. I don't bring my laptop so I won't be able to do any packaging stuff. Grub is moved to [core], meaning that there are no critical bugs in my packages left that can't wait until I return. Cheers, Ronald

Re: [aur-general] delete grub-gfx

2011-07-29 Thread Ronald van Haren
Op 29 jul. 2011 21:39 schreef KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com het volgende: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 00:58, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Am Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:47:03 +0530 schrieb KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:36, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] forgotten aur username

2011-05-28 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Provenzano provendesignstu...@gmail.com wrote: My e-mail address is provendesignstu...@gmail.com Thanks for the help :) On May 28, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: 2011/5/28 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com: On 28 May 2011 04:05,

Re: [aur-general] package submission

2011-03-03 Thread Ronald van Haren
Op 3 mrt. 2011 17:45 schreef Christopher Brannon ch...@the-brannons.com het volgende: Kyle k...@gmx.ca writes: Would lib be best, or is there something else that may fit better? How about multimedia? -- Chris It would make sense if you could choose multiple categories...categories

[aur-general] [new community packages] eeze-svn and elementary-svn

2011-02-25 Thread Ronald van Haren
FYI, I've added eeze-svn and elementary-svn libs to the e17 package group in [community]. These two packages were missing from the core EFL libs in community. Ronald

Re: [aur-general] AUR Copyright

2011-02-11 Thread Ronald van Haren
Op 11 feb. 2011 17:35 schreef Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us het volgende: On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:17:29 +, Michael Schubert mschu@gmail.com wrote: As long as the maintainer (aka copyright holder) are allowed to specify their own license then I'd be fine with it, though.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

2011-01-22 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Fri 21 Jan 2011 21:38 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: Seblu wrote: It looks like a trick question! But if I want to be a good maintainer, I do understand the reasons. and

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

2011-01-16 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:37 +0100, Seblu wrote: Hello, Tonight I decided

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2010-12-13 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote: I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting. --

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Discussion Period

2010-12-13 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote: On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote: The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU bylaws:

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure

2010-12-08 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: While reading this, one more small thing came to mind: I wonder if we should make it clear that though *the same* proposal requires a waiting period, slightly different ones don't. An example of this might be the

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure

2010-12-08 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:04:22 Ronald van Haren wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: While reading this, one more small thing came to mind: I wonder if we should

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Warning: MESA 7.9 going to testing

2010-10-12 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.de wrote: On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 09:55:43 +0200 Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote: I'm working on the new MESA release today. Please don't -Syu until all 3D drivers have been rebuild properly. If you have trouble with your

Re: [aur-general] Dropping python-numeric

2010-09-22 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: python-numeric is old, replaced by python-numpy and has had issues on x86_64 since python-2.5.  These issues are far more noticeable in python-2.7 (as in python-numeric just does not work...), so I intend to drop this

Re: [aur-general] Why is aur.archlinux.org so slow? :(

2010-09-10 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote: On 10/09/10 11:59, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com  wrote: Excerpts from Sven-Hendrik Haase's message of 2010-09-10 01:27:39 +0200:  Whenever I try

Re: [aur-general] Why is aur.archlinux.org so slow? :(

2010-09-10 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote: On 10/09/10 12:17, Ronald van Haren wrote: [...] sure it it, that is where the community repo is stored... Ronald I'm not sure I follow you. The community repo AFAIK is just like the other official except

Re: [aur-general] Why is aur.archlinux.org so slow? :(

2010-09-10 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Excerpts from Sven-Hendrik Haase's message of

Re: [aur-general] TU application.

2010-09-09 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:22, Christopher Brannon cmbranno...@gmail.com wrote: Indeed I have. Let the discussion period begin. -- Chris PS.  

Re: [aur-general] Inactive

2010-09-06 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My internet connection broke down last Saturday during some thunderstorm and has refuced to come up again ever since.  Still waiting for it to be fixed, but I have no idea how long it will take. Please feel free

[aur-general] Inactive

2010-09-01 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hi, My internet connection broke down last Saturday during some thunderstorm and has refuced to come up again ever since. Still waiting for it to be fixed, but I have no idea how long it will take. Please feel free to fix my packages if necessary. Regards, Ronald

Re: [aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only

2010-08-26 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Mon 23 Aug 2010 12:03 +0200, Philipp wrote: Hi, I just looked up the GPL notation again. Here's the relevant excerpt from the wiki: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards .. The (L)GPL has

Re: [aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only

2010-08-26 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Thu 26 Aug 2010 12:48 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Mon 23 Aug 2010 12:03 +0200, Philipp wrote: Hi, I just looked up the GPL notation

Re: [aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only

2010-08-26 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Excerpts from Roberto Alsina's message of 2010-08-26 13:16:05 +0200: On Thursday 26 August 2010 08:12:23 Ronald van Haren wrote: My second point was that we don't know what the future will bring. Will new

Re: [aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only

2010-08-26 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Philipp Überbacher wrote: It would be nice to distinguish between GPLvN only and GPLvN or later for any N. The question is which way is optimal. GPL2 GPL2-only GPL3 GPL3-only etc Wouldn't that both be clear and avoid

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: kwebkitpart

2010-08-25 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, kwebkitpart is now in [extra] and make options look the same, so I guess it can be deleted from the AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39197 Nicky -- Don't it always seem to go That you don't know what

Re: [aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only

2010-08-23 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Philipp hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Hi, I just looked up the GPL notation again. Here's the relevant excerpt from the wiki: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards .. The (L)GPL has many versions and permutations of those versions.

Re: [aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only

2010-08-23 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Excerpts from Ronald van Haren's message of 2010-08-23 12:06:24 +0200: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Philipp hollun...@lavabit.com wrote: Hi, I just looked up the GPL notation again. Here's the relevant

Re: [aur-general] Remove AUR grub2-efi package

2010-08-19 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove the grub2-efi package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34470 . I have uploaded grub2-efi-x64 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39904 and grub2-efi-x86

Re: [aur-general] Remove AUR grub2-efi package

2010-08-19 Thread Ronald van Haren
2010/8/19 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com: On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 09:51 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove the grub2-efi package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34470 . I have uploaded grub2-efi-x64 http

Re: [aur-general] Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community].

2010-08-16 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: If I have understood your correctly, you want sage to provide python and all its other components as if they were vanilla?

Re: [aur-general] Proposal to move sage-mathematics into [community].

2010-08-12 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am the maintainer of aur/sage-mathematics. I think this package has matured to the point where it could be included into the community repository. There are no issues with this package that I am currently aware

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: sympa and pidentd

2010-08-04 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Moritz Rudert hel...@h-ix.net wrote: Hello, Please, could someone orphan sympa - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29103 pidentd - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14736 because it is not updated long time and the maintainer didnt respond to

Re: [aur-general] [gnochm] drop to AUR, replace it by chmsee

2010-07-22 Thread Ronald van Haren
2010/7/22 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com: On 22 July 2010 10:47, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 07/22/2010 11:32 AM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:07:44 +0200 Laurent Carlierlordhea...@gmail.com  wrote:

[aur-general] [flock] drop to AUR

2010-07-21 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hey guys, I'd like to drop flock [1] (some social web browser) to AUR soon, if any of you want to continue to support it in community, be my guest. The reason I want to remove it is that I'm fed up with the company developing it. For years communicating with them hasn't been a pleasure. E-mails

Re: [aur-general] [flock] drop to AUR

2010-07-21 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thorsten Töpper atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:41:07 +0200 Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On Wednesday 21 July 2010 11:32:15 Ionuț Bîru wrote: i'll vote from removing entirely. they dropped support for firefox and the

Re: [aur-general] [flock] drop to AUR

2010-07-21 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thorsten Töpper atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:41:07 +0200 Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: On Wednesday 21 July 2010 11:32:15 Ionuț Bîru wrote

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jan Steffens

2010-04-19 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@student.kit.edu wrote: Greetings, Hi, Good to see another TU application, it has been far too long. Since then, I went through quite a few distributions: SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian. Gentoo was the first distribution that

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jan Steffens

2010-04-19 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Jan Steffens jan.steff...@student.kit.edu wrote: On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 10:52 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: How long have you been using Arch? A bit less than a year. There wasn't much time (about a month, if I recall correctly) between when I first heard

[aur-general] deprecated e17 packages removed (was:Re: [community] rebuilds (done))

2010-04-11 Thread Ronald van Haren
probably remove them from your machines if you have them installed (remove package list at the bottom of this mail). Ronald On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki

Re: [aur-general] [community] rebuilds (done)

2010-04-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki...@gmail.com: Community rebuilds are done now. ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works. Haven't tested but looking at the fix I suppose it may mess things up with other parts of e17. Wasn't it just possible to keep the package at the old svn

Re: [aur-general] [community] rebuilds (done)

2010-04-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki...@gmail.com: Ronald van Haren wrote: 2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykinpupyki...@gmail.com: Community rebuilds are done now. ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works. Haven't tested but looking at the fix I suppose it may mess things up with other

Re: [aur-general] [community] rebuilds (done)

2010-04-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki...@gmail.com: Ronald van Haren wrote: 2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykinpupyki...@gmail.com: Community rebuilds are done now. ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works. Haven't

Re: [aur-general] Newbie question about updating package

2010-04-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Franz Rogar franzro...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I spoke too early... System says «No está autorizado a sobreescribir el paquete fontforge-cvs.» (You're not allowed [granted] to overwrite fontforge-cvs pkg.) Mantainer lost his password and can't log in (I attach

Re: [aur-general] Newbie question about updating package

2010-04-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Franz Rogar franzro...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/4/5 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Franz Rogar franzro...@gmail.com wrote: System says «No está autorizado a sobreescribir el paquete fontforge-cvs.» (You're not allowed [granted

Re: [aur-general] package version with hyphen

2010-03-29 Thread Ronald van Haren
2010/3/29 Hervé Cauwelier he...@oursours.net: Hi, I've just noticed pkgver is not interpreted when uploading to AUR. I am packaging a program versionned 1.0-beta and I learned hypens are forbidden in pkgver: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD I first tried this:

Re: [aur-general] package version with hyphen

2010-03-29 Thread Ronald van Haren
2010/3/29 Hervé Cauwelier he...@oursours.net: On 03/29/10 11:30, Ronald van Haren wrote: 2010/3/29 Hervé Cauwelierhe...@oursours.net: The wiki doesn't give tips for cases like this. What would be your advice for not repeating myself? just use pkgver=1.0beta, you can just type the currect

Re: [aur-general] GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD

2010-03-27 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Anton Leontiev bun...@t-25.ru wrote: Hello everyone! I've updated GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD to the version 1.3.12. Can anyone check it and update the package in extra repository? Please don't. Last time I checked octave didn't build against the new

Re: [aur-general] AUR comment spammer

2010-03-17 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Tue 16 Mar 2010 21:35 +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5863) quite a bit (most of which is now

Re: [aur-general] AUR comment spammer

2010-03-16 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5863) quite a bit (most of which is now deleted). I'm getting enough email spam already. who did remove these comments, any of the TUs seen this? Ronald

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2010-03-01 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, arcpp@gmail.com arcpp@gmail.com wrote: Hi, there I am the author of ibus-sogoupycc (http://code.google.com/p/ibus-sogoupycc/ ). These package are currently in AUR: 'ibus-sogoupycc' and 'ibus-sogoupycc-svn' and are seriously outdated, currently

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2010-03-01 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:29 AM, arcpp@gmail.com arcpp@gmail.com wrote: Recently, I have made great change and updated frequently. Now it is svn-r70. AUR is svn-r25, which is unstable and lack of many new features. In additional, wrong dependencies. Isn't be good for a software owner

Re: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list

2010-02-16 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote:    gdal (out of date) updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it though.    opendx        Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf        Required by: none broken by the netcdf

Re: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list

2010-02-16 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote: On 02/16/2010 10:00 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us  wrote:    gdal (out of date) updated as it needed a rebuild

Re: [aur-general] decrease package workload in [community]

2010-02-12 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Am 10.02.2010 11:49, schrieb Ronald van Haren: Hi TUs, I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and maybe do some

Re: [aur-general] [signoff] devtools 0.9.0

2010-02-12 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote: Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 06:42:32 schrieb Eric Bélanger: My CacheDir line in pacman.conf was commented out I missed that this var was optional. Fixed in

[aur-general] decrease package workload in [community]

2010-02-10 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hi TUs, I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and maybe do some coding when I find time. For now I'll keep maintaining them as most of these belong in a binary repo (though some I don't mind dropping to

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev] partially inactive

2010-02-09 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 02.02.2010 14:35, schrieb Ronald van Haren: so a little update on this. It took a bit longer than expected and I'm still not completely done with painting and stuff (yikes I really hate painting), Who doesn't

Re: [aur-general] orphans in [community] - full list

2010-02-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) ghost1...@archlinux.us Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren ronald.archlinux.org sqlite2 Depends: readline Required by: gambas2,python-pysqlite-legacy okay, took it back as I need it for freevo through python

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2010-02-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, no problem, but it is outdated now and I have little interest in updating it. Guess I'll abandon it so that it can be adopted by someone that is interested in keeping it updated. Regards. On

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2010-02-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Ismael Barros² razielm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 It's a duplicate of this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2010-02-04 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in testing and will be officially supported by arch. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 Thanks. let's wait until it is

Re: [aur-general] Orphans in [community]-any

2010-02-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Griffiths ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote: Last Maintainer:    Ronald van Haren ronald.archlinux.org    ccsm        Depends:        compiz-core, compizconfig-python, pygtk        Required By:    none    compiz-manager        Depends:        compiz-core

Re: [aur-general] partially inactive

2010-02-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, Coming Monday I'll get the key of my new apartment where I'll be living together with my girlfriend. That's all fine and such but before I can move our stuff I have to do quite a bit of work in the new

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

2010-02-01 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Paulo Matias mat...@archlinux-br.org wrote: [snip] So I'm resigning as a Trusted User. Thanks for your contributions and good luck in the future. [snip] - lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging) please don't! :-p I bet most of them are

Re: [aur-general] Lua packages (Was: TU Resignation)

2010-02-01 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jim Pryor lists+aur-gene...@jimpryor.net wrote: On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: - lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging) please don't! :-p I bet most of them are makedepends of my awesome package. So unless

[aur-general] partially inactive

2009-12-18 Thread Ronald van Haren
Hey guys, Coming Monday I'll get the key of my new apartment where I'll be living together with my girlfriend. That's all fine and such but before I can move our stuff I have to do quite a bit of work in the new apartment. This all means that I'll still be around and try to keep up with package

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Ray Rashif (schivmeister)

2009-12-05 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/12/5 Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org On 12/05/2009 02:35 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Ionut Biru schrieb: On 12/05/2009 01:46 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:  2) How are cross-repository buildtime and optional dependencies

Re: [aur-general] gummibaerchen status?

2009-11-17 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: Should we proceed with removal? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer yes, he's been inactive for far too long without any notice. According to the bylaws, the standard voting procedure for undeclared

Re: [aur-general] status of libtool slaying

2009-11-11 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote: I remember the consensus used to be !libtool by default and now it's libtool in makepkg.conf, so what happened? some packages need the libtool files to function properly if that is what you mean. Ronald

Re: [aur-general] status of libtool slaying

2009-11-11 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/11/11 Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com 2009/11/11 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote: I remember the consensus used to be !libtool

Re: [aur-general] Monodevelop removal request

2009-10-28 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.dewrote: Hi, monodevelop was moved to [extra], please delete it in [community]. Thanks, Daniel done Ronald

Re: [aur-general] Should {libwebkit,libsoup}-newest be deleted

2009-10-13 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:15 PM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote: hi, As you might already know , webkit-gtk and its dependency libsoup are always under heavy development . I added {libwebkit,libsoup}-newest PKGBUILDS to the AUR because libwebkit releases started to depend on development

Re: [aur-general] Should {libwebkit,libsoup}-newest be deleted

2009-10-13 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:56:00PM +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:15 PM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote: hi, As you might already know , webkit-gtk and its dependency libsoup are always under

Re: [aur-general] [delete request] liferea-minimal

2009-10-13 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:13 AM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote: Can a TU delete liferea-minimal . It depends on gtkhtml2 backend . Newer releases only offer webkit as a backend . done, thanks Ronald

Re: [aur-general] AUR Jamie account

2009-10-12 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: On a related note, maybe it would be a good idea to turn on auto-pruning for AUR accounts. If you have never voted or submitted a package, your account gets deleted after 3-6 months. Just a tangential though. why? are we out

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2009-10-12 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:03:05 -0300 Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve wrote: Hi all, I'd like to re-apply to my TU position. Since I've resigned [0], many things happened, in my life, and work. In these times I was

Re: [aur-general] xorg packages

2009-10-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote: These packages are all called -git, but wrongly. They are actually just duplicate of extra packages... http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18966 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29446

Re: [aur-general] xorg packages

2009-10-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: [...] I haven't really time to look at them. Are they just poor quality or do they possible should be '...don't really have...' of course :-p Ronald

Re: [aur-general] xorg packages

2009-10-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
cc-ing to speedvin so he has a change to reply and take action. (speedvin if you reply please do so to the aur-general mailing list) (sorry for top posting) Ronald On 10/2/09, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [aur-general] xorg packages

2009-10-02 Thread Ronald van Haren
now for real, cc-ing On 10/2/09, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote: cc-ing to speedvin so he has a change to reply and take action. (speedvin if you reply please do so to the aur-general mailing list) (sorry for top posting) Ronald On 10/2/09, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [aur-general] spam in out-of-date notifications for [community] packages

2009-09-29 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Chris Brannon cmbranno...@gmail.comwrote: It seems that someone is sending spam via out-of-date notifications for packages in the official repos. How do I clear the out-of-date flag on my packages these days? I can't seem to be able to do that with the new

Re: [aur-general] aurtools, remove?

2009-09-28 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Sat 26 Sep 2009 21:27 +0200, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Imanol Celaya ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Evangelos Foutrasfoutre...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] aurtools, remove?

2009-09-28 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Mon 28 Sep 2009 14:11 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote: On Sat 26 Sep 2009 21:27 +0200, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:00 AM

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] automatic package builder

2009-09-25 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta abh...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/9/25 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com: [...] I think a website would be really cool. Something like Ubuntu's PPA -- that system is really nice. Abhishek Do you have a link explaining what you exactly mean

Re: [aur-general] up-to-date package management instructions

2009-09-18 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Are the instructions on the DeveloperWiki's HOWTO Be A Packager page current? I wrote a script a while ago to handle updating packages but recently it stopped working. I also tried to add reflector but that didn't work either

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: [arch-general] discussion about arora-git

2009-09-15 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.comwrote: -- Forwarded message -- hi guys, what are we doing with arora-git? now is unmaintained and arora from extra si more up to date than arora-git. -- Ionut I'd say move it to unsupported together

Re: [aur-general] Community orphans - Was: discussion about arora-git

2009-09-15 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Ronald van Haren wrote: How about giving two weeks from now for everyone to adopt their orphans (or any orphans left) and start moving things to unsupported after that? I actually have some time coming up in about two

Re: [aur-general] Adoption of community package 'monit'

2009-09-07 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Andrea Scarpinoand...@archlinux.org wrote: On 05/09/2009, Jeffrey Gelens jeff...@gelens.org wrote: The monit package in the community repos (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/monit/ ) is an orphan for a really long time now. I would like to adopt

  1   2   3   >