On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Aaron t0ne...@causal.ca wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 01:09:37 -0400
Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, GSC xgd...@gmail.com wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JOYOAUTO/
Spam here:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Hi, Trusted Users!
The discussion period has ended, please cast your votes on [1]. The
discussion can be found on [2].
Please note that this vote is only about converting the bylaws to
AsciiDoc [3], [4]; there
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 2 novembre 2012 09:10:47 Bartłomiej Piotrowski a écrit :
The vote for Felix' application is over.
Yes: 10
No: 4
Abstain: 7
Total: 21
Active TUs: 32
Ioni states that
Not sure who is in charge of this nowadays... (I don't think I can but
maybe I'm missing something)
Please remove user testificate from AUR and all his package/posts.
Also block his IP if you can. The user is spamming the AUR.
Thanks.
Ronald
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Karol Blazewicz
karol.blazew...@gmail.com wrote:
This user seems to be spamming the AUR comments with some gibberish
(attempt at hacking?).
An example: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18909
[0;0H [4m [5m [97;107m [8m (0 [2J
The content seems to be
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:34 PM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote:
please. remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54033
no need anymore. (wxgtk2.9 from Community no need gconf)
greetings
Done, thanks.
Ronald
Hi guys,
As I'm on holiday without computer and mostly internet can someone take
care of updating emesene as I requested two weeks ago. The old version
doesn't work anymore due to server side changes.
Thanks.
Ronald
Op 22 nov. 2011 15:39 schreef
Hi Ronald,
MrElendig told me that would be
Hi all,
I'm on vacation for the next three weeks (starting from now + a few hours).
Perhaps one of you guys (devs/TUs) can take care of some things:
- move dhcpcd to [core] when it has the required i686 signoffs
- upgrade emesene to some unofficial version they have around
(microsoft changed the
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Erik Wesselius
e...@corporateeurope.org wrote:
Hi there,
I lost my password for aur.archlinux.org and I am not sure with which email
adress I subscribed. My username is erikwesselius
Thanks for your help.
Erik Wesselius
--
email:
Op 3 sep. 2011 18:14 schreef Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com het
volgende:
Hello,
My name is Alexander Rødseth. I'm from Oslo, Norway, am 29 years old
for two more months and have been using Arch for a couple of years.
My first taste of Linux was a brief acquaintance with Red Hat over a
Op 31 aug. 2011 03:11 schreef Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com het
volgende:
Hello everyone!
I haven't been very involved with the AUR for a long while, and I don't
really see that changing much. Since I only have a few packages I think
it's time for me to resign as a TU. I may still throw a
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'll be in Sweden for a short family visit between tonight and Sunday
evening. I don't bring my laptop so I won't be able to do any
packaging stuff.
Grub is moved to [core], meaning that there are no critical
Hi all,
I'll be in Sweden for a short family visit between tonight and Sunday
evening. I don't bring my laptop so I won't be able to do any
packaging stuff.
Grub is moved to [core], meaning that there are no critical bugs in my
packages left that can't wait until I return.
Cheers,
Ronald
Op 29 jul. 2011 21:39 schreef KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com het
volgende:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 00:58, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:47:03 +0530
schrieb KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:36, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Provenzano
provendesignstu...@gmail.com wrote:
My e-mail address is provendesignstu...@gmail.com
Thanks for the help :)
On May 28, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
2011/5/28 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
On 28 May 2011 04:05,
Op 3 mrt. 2011 17:45 schreef Christopher Brannon ch...@the-brannons.com
het volgende:
Kyle k...@gmx.ca writes:
Would lib be best, or is there
something else that may fit better?
How about multimedia?
-- Chris
It would make sense if you could choose multiple categories...categories
FYI,
I've added eeze-svn and elementary-svn libs to the e17 package group
in [community]. These two packages were missing from the core EFL libs
in community.
Ronald
Op 11 feb. 2011 17:35 schreef Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us het
volgende:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:17:29 +, Michael Schubert mschu@gmail.com
wrote:
As long as the maintainer (aka copyright holder) are allowed to specify
their
own license then I'd be fine with it, though.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri 21 Jan 2011 21:38 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Seblu wrote:
It looks like a trick question!
But if I want to be a good maintainer, I do understand the reasons.
and
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:37 +0100, Seblu wrote:
Hello,
Tonight I decided
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for
my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
--
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the
TU
bylaws:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
While reading this, one more small thing came to mind: I wonder if we should
make it clear that though *the same* proposal requires a waiting period,
slightly different ones don't. An example of this might be the
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 12:04:22 Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org
wrote:
While reading this, one more small thing came to mind: I wonder if we
should
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 09:55:43 +0200
Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de wrote:
I'm working on the new MESA release today. Please don't -Syu until all
3D drivers have been rebuild properly. If you have trouble with your
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
python-numeric is old, replaced by python-numpy and has had issues on x86_64
since python-2.5. These issues are far more noticeable in python-2.7 (as in
python-numeric just does not work...), so I intend to drop this
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote:
On 10/09/10 11:59, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Sven-Hendrik Haase's message of 2010-09-10 01:27:39 +0200:
Whenever I try
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Nathan Wayde kum...@konnichi.com wrote:
On 10/09/10 12:17, Ronald van Haren wrote:
[...]
sure it it, that is where the community repo is stored...
Ronald
I'm not sure I follow you. The community repo AFAIK is just like the other
official except
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Sven-Hendrik Haase's message of
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:22, Christopher Brannon cmbranno...@gmail.com
wrote:
Indeed I have.
Let the discussion period begin.
-- Chris
PS.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My internet connection broke down last Saturday during some thunderstorm and
has refuced to come up again ever since. Still waiting for it to be fixed,
but I have no idea how long it will take.
Please feel free
Hi,
My internet connection broke down last Saturday during some thunderstorm and
has refuced to come up again ever since. Still waiting for it to be fixed,
but I have no idea how long it will take.
Please feel free to fix my packages if necessary.
Regards,
Ronald
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon 23 Aug 2010 12:03 +0200, Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I just looked up the GPL notation again.
Here's the relevant excerpt from the wiki:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
..
The (L)GPL has
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 26 Aug 2010 12:48 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon 23 Aug 2010 12:03 +0200, Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I just looked up the GPL notation
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Roberto Alsina's message of 2010-08-26 13:16:05 +0200:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 08:12:23 Ronald van Haren wrote:
My second point was that we don't know what the future will bring.
Will new
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Philipp Überbacher wrote:
It would be nice to distinguish between GPLvN only and GPLvN or later
for any N. The question is which way is optimal.
GPL2
GPL2-only
GPL3
GPL3-only
etc
Wouldn't that both be clear and avoid
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
kwebkitpart is now in [extra] and make options look the same, so I guess it
can be deleted from the AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39197
Nicky
--
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Philipp hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi,
I just looked up the GPL notation again.
Here's the relevant excerpt from the wiki:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards
..
The (L)GPL has many versions and permutations of those versions.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Ronald van Haren's message of 2010-08-23 12:06:24 +0200:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Philipp hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi,
I just looked up the GPL notation again.
Here's the relevant
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com wrote:
Please remove the grub2-efi package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34470 . I have uploaded
grub2-efi-x64 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39904 and
grub2-efi-x86
2010/8/19 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 09:51 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com wrote:
Please remove the grub2-efi package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34470 . I have uploaded
grub2-efi-x64 http
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
If I have understood your correctly, you want sage to provide python and
all its other components as if they were vanilla?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I am the maintainer of aur/sage-mathematics.
I think this package has matured to the point where it could be included
into the community repository.
There are no issues with this package that I am currently aware
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Moritz Rudert hel...@h-ix.net wrote:
Hello,
Please, could someone orphan
sympa - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29103
pidentd - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14736
because it is not updated long time and the maintainer didnt respond to
2010/7/22 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
On 22 July 2010 10:47, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 07/22/2010 11:32 AM, Thorsten Töpper wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:07:44 +0200
Laurent Carlierlordhea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I'd like to drop flock [1] (some social web browser) to AUR soon, if
any of you want to continue to support it in community, be my guest.
The reason I want to remove it is that I'm fed up with the company
developing it. For years communicating with them hasn't been a
pleasure. E-mails
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thorsten Töpper
atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:41:07 +0200
Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 11:32:15 Ionuț Bîru wrote:
i'll vote from removing entirely. they dropped support for firefox
and the
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thorsten Töpper
atsut...@freethoughts.de wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:41:07 +0200
Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 11:32:15 Ionuț Bîru wrote
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jan Steffens
jan.steff...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Greetings,
Hi,
Good to see another TU application, it has been far too long.
Since then, I went through quite a few distributions: SuSE, Mandrake,
Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian. Gentoo was the first distribution that
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Jan Steffens
jan.steff...@student.kit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 10:52 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
How long have you been using Arch?
A bit less than a year. There wasn't much time (about a month, if I
recall correctly) between when I first heard
probably
remove them from your machines if you have them installed (remove
package list at the bottom of this mail).
Ronald
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki...@gmail.com:
Community rebuilds are done now.
ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works.
Haven't tested but looking at the fix I suppose it may mess things up
with other parts of e17. Wasn't it just possible to keep the package
at the old svn
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki...@gmail.com:
Ronald van Haren wrote:
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykinpupyki...@gmail.com:
Community rebuilds are done now.
ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works.
Haven't tested but looking at the fix I suppose it may mess things up
with other
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykin pupyki...@gmail.com:
Ronald van Haren wrote:
2010/4/5 Sergej Pupykinpupyki...@gmail.com:
Community rebuilds are done now.
ecore-svn fix likes a hack and I did not test if it works.
Haven't
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Franz Rogar franzro...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I spoke too early...
System says «No está autorizado a sobreescribir el paquete
fontforge-cvs.» (You're not allowed [granted] to overwrite
fontforge-cvs pkg.)
Mantainer lost his password and can't log in (I attach
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Franz Rogar franzro...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/5 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Franz Rogar franzro...@gmail.com wrote:
System says «No está autorizado a sobreescribir el paquete
fontforge-cvs.» (You're not allowed [granted
2010/3/29 Hervé Cauwelier he...@oursours.net:
Hi,
I've just noticed pkgver is not interpreted when uploading to AUR.
I am packaging a program versionned 1.0-beta and I learned hypens are
forbidden in pkgver: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
I first tried this:
2010/3/29 Hervé Cauwelier he...@oursours.net:
On 03/29/10 11:30, Ronald van Haren wrote:
2010/3/29 Hervé Cauwelierhe...@oursours.net:
The wiki doesn't give tips for cases like this. What would be your advice
for not repeating myself?
just use pkgver=1.0beta, you can just type the currect
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Anton Leontiev bun...@t-25.ru wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've updated GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD to the version 1.3.12.
Can anyone check it and update the package in extra repository?
Please don't. Last time I checked octave didn't build against the new
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue 16 Mar 2010 21:35 +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com
wrote:
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5863) quite a bit (most of
which is now
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5863) quite a bit (most of
which is now deleted). I'm getting enough email spam already.
who did remove these comments, any of the TUs seen this?
Ronald
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, arcpp@gmail.com
arcpp@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, there
I am the author of ibus-sogoupycc (http://code.google.com/p/ibus-sogoupycc/
).
These package are currently in AUR: 'ibus-sogoupycc' and
'ibus-sogoupycc-svn'
and are seriously outdated, currently
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:29 AM, arcpp@gmail.com
arcpp@gmail.com wrote:
Recently, I have made great change and updated frequently.
Now it is svn-r70.
AUR is svn-r25, which is unstable and lack of many new features. In
additional, wrong dependencies.
Isn't be good for a software owner
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote:
gdal (out of date)
updated as it needed a rebuild for netcdf 4.1-1. I did not adopt it though.
opendx
Depends: imagemagick,lesstif,netcdf
Required by: none
broken by the netcdf
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote:
On 02/16/2010 10:00 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote:
gdal (out of date)
updated as it needed a rebuild
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Husmann
stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Am 10.02.2010 11:49, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
Hi TUs,
I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of
you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and
maybe do some
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 06:42:32 schrieb Eric Bélanger:
My CacheDir line in pacman.conf was commented out
I missed that this var was optional. Fixed in
Hi TUs,
I'd like to drop some/most of my packages in [community] to some of
you guys so I can focus more on packages in [core] and [extra], and
maybe do some coding when I find time.
For now I'll keep maintaining them as most of these belong in a binary
repo (though some I don't mind dropping to
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 02.02.2010 14:35, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
so a little update on this.
It took a bit longer than expected and I'm still not completely done
with painting and stuff (yikes I really hate painting),
Who doesn't
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
ghost1...@archlinux.us
Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren ronald.archlinux.org
sqlite2
Depends: readline
Required by: gambas2,python-pysqlite-legacy
okay, took it back as I need it for freevo through python
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, no problem, but it is outdated now and I have little interest in
updating it.
Guess I'll abandon it so that it can be adopted by someone that is
interested in keeping it updated.
Regards.
On
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Ismael Barros² razielm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846
It's a duplicate of this package:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727
I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in
testing and will be officially supported by arch.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036
Thanks.
let's wait until it is
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Daniel Griffiths
ghost1...@archlinux.us wrote:
Last Maintainer: Ronald van Haren ronald.archlinux.org
ccsm
Depends: compiz-core, compizconfig-python, pygtk
Required By: none
compiz-manager
Depends: compiz-core
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Coming Monday I'll get the key of my new apartment where I'll be
living together with my girlfriend. That's all fine and such but
before I can move our stuff I have to do quite a bit of work in the
new
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Paulo Matias mat...@archlinux-br.org wrote:
[snip]
So I'm resigning as a Trusted User.
Thanks for your contributions and good luck in the future.
[snip]
- lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging)
please don't! :-p I bet most of them are
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jim Pryor
lists+aur-gene...@jimpryor.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:
- lua-related (luadoc, luafilesystem, luajit, lualogging)
please don't! :-p I bet most of them are makedepends of my awesome
package. So unless
Hey guys,
Coming Monday I'll get the key of my new apartment where I'll be
living together with my girlfriend. That's all fine and such but
before I can move our stuff I have to do quite a bit of work in the
new apartment.
This all means that I'll still be around and try to keep up with
package
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/5 Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org
On 12/05/2009 02:35 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Ionut Biru schrieb:
On 12/05/2009 01:46 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
2) How are cross-repository buildtime and optional dependencies
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
Should we proceed with removal?
--
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
yes, he's been inactive for far too long without any notice.
According to the bylaws, the standard voting procedure for undeclared
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember the consensus used to be !libtool by default and now it's libtool
in makepkg.conf, so what happened?
some packages need the libtool files to function properly if that is
what you mean.
Ronald
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/11 Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com
2009/11/11 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com
wrote:
I remember the consensus used to be !libtool
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Isenmann daniel.isenm...@gmx.dewrote:
Hi,
monodevelop was moved to [extra], please delete it in [community].
Thanks,
Daniel
done
Ronald
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:15 PM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote:
hi,
As you might already know , webkit-gtk and its dependency libsoup are
always under heavy development . I added {libwebkit,libsoup}-newest
PKGBUILDS to the AUR because libwebkit releases started to depend on
development
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:56:00PM +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:15 PM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote:
hi,
As you might already know , webkit-gtk and its dependency libsoup are
always under
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:13 AM, nez...@allurelinux.org wrote:
Can a TU delete liferea-minimal .
It depends on gtkhtml2 backend . Newer releases only offer webkit as a
backend .
done, thanks
Ronald
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
On a related note, maybe it would be a good idea to turn on
auto-pruning for AUR accounts. If you have never voted or submitted a
package, your account gets deleted after 3-6 months. Just a tangential
though.
why? are we out
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:03:05 -0300
Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.com.ve wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to re-apply to my TU position.
Since I've resigned [0], many things happened, in my life, and work.
In these times I was
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
These packages are all called -git, but wrongly. They are actually
just duplicate of extra packages...
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18966
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29446
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I haven't really time to look at them. Are they just poor quality or do
they possible
should be '...don't really have...' of course :-p
Ronald
cc-ing to speedvin so he has a change to reply and take action.
(speedvin if you reply please do so to the aur-general mailing list)
(sorry for top posting)
Ronald
On 10/2/09, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote
now for real, cc-ing
On 10/2/09, Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com wrote:
cc-ing to speedvin so he has a change to reply and take action.
(speedvin if you reply please do so to the aur-general mailing list)
(sorry for top posting)
Ronald
On 10/2/09, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Chris Brannon cmbranno...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems that someone is sending spam via out-of-date notifications
for packages in the official repos.
How do I clear the out-of-date flag on my packages these days?
I can't seem to be able to do that with the new
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat 26 Sep 2009 21:27 +0200, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Imanol Celaya
ornitorrin...@archlinux-es.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Evangelos Foutrasfoutre...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon 28 Sep 2009 14:11 +0200, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat 26 Sep 2009 21:27 +0200, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:00 AM
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Abhishek Dasgupta abh...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/25 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com:
[...]
I think a website would be really cool. Something like Ubuntu's
PPA -- that system is really nice.
Abhishek
Do you have a link explaining what you exactly mean
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Are the instructions on the DeveloperWiki's HOWTO Be A Packager page
current? I wrote a script a while ago to handle updating packages but
recently it stopped working. I also tried to add reflector but that
didn't work either
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.comwrote:
-- Forwarded message --
hi guys,
what are we doing with arora-git? now is unmaintained and arora from
extra si more up to date than arora-git.
--
Ionut
I'd say move it to unsupported together
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Ronald van Haren wrote:
How about giving two weeks from now for everyone to adopt their orphans
(or
any orphans left) and start moving things to unsupported after that?
I actually have some time coming up in about two
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Andrea Scarpinoand...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 05/09/2009, Jeffrey Gelens jeff...@gelens.org wrote:
The monit package in the community repos
(http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/monit/
) is an orphan for a really long time now. I would like to adopt
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo