Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-27 Thread Tobias Kieslich
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tobias Kieslich > wrote: > > Hi, > > > >        I was reaaly busy lately so I wasn't able to push tha changes I made > > locally. > > I got rid of gvimrc in etc, I still wonder thought why they would

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-27 Thread Kessia 'even' Pinheiro
Hi! On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > Hi, > >        I was reaaly busy lately so I wasn't able to push tha changes I made > locally. > I got rid of gvimrc in etc, I still wonder thought why they would > have such a file upstream. Also virc is gone. Since we won't ship a v

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-20 Thread Andrei Thorp
Thank you very much :) Should be able to close at least one bug too. -Andrei "Garoth" Thorp On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Tobias Kieslich wrote: > Hi, > >        I was reaaly busy lately so I wasn't able to push tha changes I made > locally. >> 1) gvim package: Shipping an /etc/gvimrc which

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-20 Thread Tobias Kieslich
Hi, I was reaaly busy lately so I wasn't able to push tha changes I made locally. > 1) gvim package: Shipping an /etc/gvimrc which, due to the order that >   Vim loads rc files, overrides any settings in the user's ~/.vimrc. >   Considering that some users make the conscious decision to ke

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-20 Thread Andrei Thorp
Fair enough, thank you. -AT On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote: >> It's been mentioned to me that several bugs are open around these >> issues, and if this indeed the case, I believe it valuable to bring >> attention to th

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > It's been mentioned to me that several bugs are open around these > issues, and if this indeed the case, I believe it valuable to bring > attention to them -- a mailing list cannot hurt. Well, at the very least, I'm sure the AUR mailing list

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Andrei Thorp
It's been mentioned to me that several bugs are open around these issues, and if this indeed the case, I believe it valuable to bring attention to them -- a mailing list cannot hurt. -AT On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Daenyth Blank > w

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:35, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> >> What we could do is simply ship nvi instead, for that purpose, and >> stick with only two packages, vim and gvim. That would help things >> greatly. >> > > +1 I just realized this

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:35, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > What we could do is simply ship nvi instead, for that purpose, and > stick with only two packages, vim and gvim. That would help things > greatly. > +1

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Hello, fellow Archers. > > Recently, I had a question about Vim, so I went to the #vim channel in > IRC. I was doing something > that should be working, but it wasn't. Surprisingly, the question came > up, "Are you on Arch?" > > Turns out that

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Allan McRae
Andrei Thorp wrote: There is a new vim setup on its way which should address some of these issues. Not sure what the status of it is though... Allan

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Kessia 'even' Pinheiro
Hi, I had that problem too, i asked for something in #vim channel and they only ridicularize vim package from Arch. I tried talk with Tobias about the vim upgrade for support ruby1.9, but he are so far from fix it, looking for problems which isnt important, in my vision. VI package are with 65 pat

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Andrei Thorp
Thanks for sending it along, Dae. -AT On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote: > Hi, > > I had that problem too, i asked for something in #vim channel and they > only ridicularize vim package from Arch. I tried talk with Tobias > about the vim upgrade for support ruby1.9,

Re: [aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:54, Andrei Thorp wrote: > Hello, fellow Archers. > > Recently, I had a question about Vim, so I went to the #vim channel in > IRC. I was doing something > that should be working, but it wasn't. Surprisingly, the question came > up, "Are you on Arch?" > > Turns out that s

[aur-general] Arch's Vim Failings & Solution Suggestions

2009-03-19 Thread Andrei Thorp
Hello, fellow Archers. Recently, I had a question about Vim, so I went to the #vim channel in IRC. I was doing something that should be working, but it wasn't. Surprisingly, the question came up, "Are you on Arch?" Turns out that several of the peolpe I most respect in the #vim IRC channel are ve