Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:01:47 +0100, Christian Rebischke wrote: >On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:12:19PM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> No one is going to delete an AUR package (much less a repo >> package :p) for a confusingly nonstandard pkgver, we don't even >> delete packages that are *far* worse. >

Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:12:19PM -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > No one is going to delete an AUR package (much less a repo package :p) > for a confusingly nonstandard pkgver, we don't even delete packages that > are *far* worse. There are reasons why AUR is also called

Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

On 03/08/2017 07:37 PM, Ivy Foster wrote: > Of course, you also can't be forced to install a packaging whose > versioning or build options you dislike. PKGBUILDs are trivial to edit > to taste. > > I recognize that the AUR ML is a slightly heretical place to suggest > this, but...the AUR is not

Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 03/08/2017 04:06 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:52 -0300, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > >> 2017-03-08 17:53 GMT-03:00 Ralf Mardorf : > >>> my understanding is, that if possible, it

Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

On 03/08/2017 04:06 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:52 -0300, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: >> 2017-03-08 17:53 GMT-03:00 Ralf Mardorf : >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> my understanding is, that if possible, it should look like this >>> >>> 1.2.r3.gabcdef7 >>> >>> and

Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:52 -0300, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: >2017-03-08 17:53 GMT-03:00 Ralf Mardorf : > >> Hi, >> >> my understanding is, that if possible, it should look like this >> >> 1.2.r3.gabcdef7 >> >> and not alternatively >> >> 1.2_r3_gabcdef7 >> >> or >> >>

Re: [aur-general] VCS package guidelines

2017-03-08 17:53 GMT-03:00 Ralf Mardorf : > Hi, > > my understanding is, that if possible, it should look like this > > 1.2.r3.gabcdef7 > > and not alternatively > > 1.2_r3_gabcdef7 > > or > > 1.2_3_gabcdef7 > > A maintainer disagrees: > > "The pkgver extracts on the

[aur-general] VCS package guidelines

Hi, my understanding is, that if possible, it should look like this 1.2.r3.gabcdef7 and not alternatively 1.2_r3_gabcdef7 or 1.2_3_gabcdef7 A maintainer disagrees: "The pkgver extracts on the wiki are not there as strict rules that you need to comply with, but simply as examples that