Didn't know it existed :) I've adapted the nvidia-all package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 and updated it for
304.60. I used your PKGBUILD from the nvidia-beta-all package but
changed it slightly so that it doesn't build the module for the
linux-mainline kernel. I'm currently
Getting a bit off-topic here, but if it regularly needs patching take
a look at the example patch given with nvidia-beta-all (PKGBUILD
includes logic to include arbitrary patches if the names match from
the srcdir).
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
I considered doing that but the package would need to be updated more
often to allow for changes to patches and I think that would be an
unnecessary inconvenience for anyone that is using nvidia-all but not
using linux-mainline. It doesn't make a huge difference overall to me
so I don't mind
The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 hasn't
been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.
Thanks.
On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
The nvidia-ice package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15441 hasn't
been updated in over a year. Can the powers at be transfer the maintenance
of the package over to me? My username is cian1500ww.
Thanks.
Have
No, I'll send the maintainer an email now. I didn't think there would
be any need seeing as it hasn't been updated in over a year.
On 24 October 2012 22:00, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 October 2012 22:47, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com wrote:
The nvidia-ice package:
Shameless plug - why not just use nvidia-all (or nvidia-beta-all if
that floats your boat). nvidea-X packages, where X is some custom
kernel, tend to have very low usage since usage of X kernel to begin
with is pretty low, and nvidia-X usage must be a subset of that.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:03
