Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild

2009-04-08 Thread Laurie Clark-Michalek
Ye, I've been thinking about this. My current feeling is to add hicolour-icon-theme to opt-depends and then put an echo about updating the icon cache in the post_install. Currently, hicolour-icon-theme is a depend which seems rather overkill to me, and the icon cache is updated from post_install

Re: [aur-general] Use of sudo in pkgbuild

2009-04-08 Thread Jan de Groot
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 20:06 +, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote: The pkg will not build if I don't have sudo enabled. It's because gtk-update-icon-cache is used during the make install, regardless of directory. See the error message below. gtk-update-icon-cache: Failed to open file

Re: [aur-general] Broken package

2009-04-08 Thread Lucas Salies Brum
build() { cp -R /home/richard/devel/packages/usr $startdir/pkg } You really think this PKGBUILD needs repair? --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org 2009/4/7 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca Btw, instead of deleting it, we could have asked him to include the proper

Re: [aur-general] Broken package

2009-04-08 Thread Ronald van Haren
On 4/8/09, Andrei Thorp gar...@gmail.com wrote: Well of course it does, clearly it something really wrong for a legitimate (I assume) package that users could want. Perhaps there really are people out there that want emesene-bugfix. Though I'm not really sure what bug this fixes. -AT On

Re: [aur-general] machine-update in AUR

2009-04-08 Thread Ronald van Haren
On 4/8/09, Mathias Burén mathias.bu...@gmail.com wrote: Could someone please orphan machine-update? Author doesn't respond to emails and I've a working PKGBUILD ready. -- Kind regards, Mathias Burén done

Re: [aur-general] machine-update in AUR

2009-04-08 Thread Mathias Burén
Thanks, adopted and updated. 2009/4/8 Ronald van Haren pre...@gmail.com On 4/8/09, Mathias Burén mathias.bu...@gmail.com wrote: Could someone please orphan machine-update? Author doesn't respond to emails and I've a working PKGBUILD ready. -- Kind regards, Mathias Burén done

Re: [aur-general] pkgconflict: a tool to find file conflicts when building packages

2009-04-08 Thread Abhishek Dasgupta
2009/4/9 Chris Brannon cmbran...@cox.net: I made a fork of pkgtools on github. Have a look at the sqlite branch of http://github.com/CMB/pkgtools I wrote a script which incrementally updates an SQLite database from a REPO.files.tar.gz tarball.  It is in pkgtools/other/repofile2db.py The code

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Ju Liu
On 08/apr/09, at 21:42, Lucas Salies Brum wrote: I can not find the sources for this package! http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10316 http://download.sarine.nl/Programs/gmpc/?

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Xyne
Lucas Salies Brum lu...@archlinux.com.br wrote: I can not find the sources for this package! http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10316 I wait 24 hours to drop it. Thanks, --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sarine.nl/gmpc/ - gmpc site http://gmpc.wikia.com/wiki/Gnome_Music_Player_Client

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Bram Schoenmakers
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 21:42:42 Lucas Salies Brum wrote: Hi, I can not find the sources for this package! http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10316 I wait 24 hours to drop it. Thanks, --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org It's mirrored here

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Xyne
Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Lucas Salies Brum lu...@archlinux.com.br wrote: I can not find the sources for this package! http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10316 I wait 24 hours to drop it. Thanks, --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sarine.nl/gmpc/ - gmpc site

Re: [aur-general] Broken package

2009-04-08 Thread Lucas Salies Brum
This was not the purpose of my question, I just want to help, then I apologize. Remember, I'm from Brazil, many sentences are poorly translated by me! :] --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org 2009/4/8 Arkham liuj...@gmail.com On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM,

Re: [aur-general] Cannot find the source

2009-04-08 Thread Lucas Salies Brum
Sorry for the incompetence, thank you. --- Lucas Saliés Brum http://sistematico.org lsbrum @ irc.freenode.org 2009/4/8 Giovanni Scafora linuxma...@gmail.com 2009/4/8, Lucas Salies Brum lu...@archlinux.com.br: I can not find the sources for this package!

Re: [aur-general] Spam in the AUR

2009-04-08 Thread Paulo Matias
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:19 PM, merp boop synthe...@gmail.com wrote: There's a user by the name myfilefind that is promoting his site through the AUR comments it seems. Hi, Thanks for notifying. I suspended the account and removed the comment. Best regards, Paulo Matias

[aur-general] Inactive

2009-04-08 Thread Imanol Celaya
I'll be inactive for holidays from 9 of April until the 13nd or 14nd(I think) please, take a special look after panda3d, the 1.6.0-2 version should be uploaded to community, but I'd need for someone to build and upload it for i686(should build straightforward, but be careful, if it fails there's

[aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Florian Pritz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vsound [1] doesn't seem to be in the community database (pacman can't find it). Could someone take a look at this? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9165 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Andrea Scarpino
2009/4/9 Florian Pritz f...@gmx.at: Vsound [1] doesn't seem to be in the community database (pacman can't find it). Could someone take a look at this? $ sudo pacman -S vsound Password: resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (1): vsound-0.6-1 Total Download Size:

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Xyne
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:21:25 +0200 Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: 2009/4/9 Florian Pritz f...@gmx.at: Vsound [1] doesn't seem to be in the community database (pacman can't find it). Could someone take a look at this? $ sudo pacman -S vsound Password: resolving

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 20:57, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote: Are you on i686? I'm on x86_64 and vsound is not in community. I forced a db refresh to be sure and tried pacman -Ss vsound too. Xyne Tried using another mirror?

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Allan McRae
Xyne wrote: On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:21:25 +0200 Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote: 2009/4/9 Florian Pritz f...@gmx.at: Vsound [1] doesn't seem to be in the community database (pacman can't find it). Could someone take a look at this? $ sudo pacman -S vsound Password:

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Tim Yang
On 04/08/2009 07:57 PM, Xyne wrote: On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 01:21:25 +0200 Andrea Scarpinoand...@archlinux.org wrote: 2009/4/9 Florian Pritzf...@gmx.at: Vsound [1] doesn't seem to be in the community database (pacman can't find it). Could someone take a look at this? $ sudo

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/4/8, Florian Pritz f...@gmx.at: Vsound [1] doesn't seem to be in the community database (pacman can't find it). Could someone take a look at this? vsound doesn't build for x86_64 [1]. [1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community64_Status#multimedia -- Arch Linux Developer

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Allan McRae wrote: vsound does not build on x86_64 http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community64_Status#multimedia Allan Hi, mmm i don'tuse this package, but this can be compiled in x86_64: removing a unrecognized macro (AC_C_FIND_ENDIAN_NESS) from configure.in and regenerating the

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: Allan McRae wrote: vsound does not build on x86_64 http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community64_Status#multimedia Allan Hi, mmm i don'tuse this package, but this can be compiled in x86_64: removing a unrecognized macro (AC_C_FIND_ENDIAN_NESS)

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/4/8, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar: + sed 's|^AC_C_FIND_ENDIAN_NESS|dnl AC_C_FIND_ENDIAN_NESS|g' -i configure.in + autoreconf -f -i Fixed. -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/4/8, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar: mmm no i am wrong, sorry :S, the macro is defined at acendian.m4 the just patch this file sed 's#86 )#86 | x86_64 )#g' acendian.m4 You're not wrong. This line does not fix: sed 's#86 )#86 | x86_64 )#g' acendian.m4 Your first solution

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
Giovanni Scafora wrote: 2009/4/8, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar: + sed 's|^AC_C_FIND_ENDIAN_NESS|dnl AC_C_FIND_ENDIAN_NESS|g' -i configure.in + autoreconf -f -i Fixed. Nono, this is wrong. because this is a defined user macro that defines some #defines for

Re: [aur-general] vsound not in repo DB?

2009-04-08 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/4/8, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar: One note: The license in PKGBUILD is LGPL but in the file COPYING is GPL2 Look at http://www.vsound.org/license.php -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it

[aur-general] sphinx aur package

2009-04-08 Thread Bobby Wilson
The package Sphinx 0.9.8_rc2-1 is now out of date, and seems to be abandoned. I contacted the currently listed maintainer of the package on 3/20 without reply. I would like to continue maintenance of this package. If someone else would like to continue maintenance of the package I am fine with

Re: [aur-general] sphinx aur package

2009-04-08 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/4/8, Bobby Wilson bo...@entryway.net: The package Sphinx 0.9.8_rc2-1 is now out of date, and seems to be abandoned. I contacted the currently listed maintainer of the package on 3/20 without reply. I would like to continue maintenance of this package. If someone else would like to