Hi Levente,
I use urlwatch and an Android app named Web Alert. The cell phone app is
useful for me to receive update notifications on-the-go when the
computer(s) is(are) turned off.
But I do not have that much rules listed on them.
On 26/10/2018 15:37, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
>
On 10/26/18 08:44pm, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
can you please fix this and make your gpg key available somewhere?
I've pushed 0F8E620A up.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 26/10/2018 19:40, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote:
> Hey Konstantin,
>
> I'm wondering which tool you use to keep track of upstream
> releases? is it urlwatch or such?
>
>
> cheers,
> Levente
>
Personally, the packages I maintain are not that numerous that I need a
tool, so I check a
On 10/26/18 2:48 PM, Michael Kogan wrote:
> I would also mention that frequent version bumping is quite disturbing.
> Imho, git packages should not be updated by the package maintainer (unless
> there are some very significant changes involved) - this way every user can
> decide when to update
I would also mention that frequent version bumping is quite disturbing.
Imho, git packages should not be updated by the package maintainer (unless
there are some very significant changes involved) - this way every user can
decide when to update while fresh installs will get the most recent git
Hi Brett
On 10/25/18 8:22 PM, David Runge wrote:
>
> P.S.: As you've just created a new pgp key pair for your address, please
> make sure to upload the pubkey to the keyservers!
>
can you please fix this and make your gpg key available somewhere?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 10/26/18 2:33 PM, Shay Gover via aur-general wrote:
> That's from outside the PKGBUILD. I already did that when I uploaded the
> package a month ago. But since then the package was updated. It's not
> automatic versioning if I need to update SRCINFO every time.
You what now? Why do you need to
Hey Konstantin,
I'm wondering which tool you use to keep track of upstream
releases? is it urlwatch or such?
cheers,
Levente
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey Daniel,
out of curiosity, what is you tool of choice to keep track of upstream
releases? something like urlwatch?
cheers,
Levente
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:33:12 +0300
Shay Gover via aur-general wrote:
> >
> > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:09:36 +0100
> > From: Konstantin Gizdov
> > To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version
> > Message-ID: <8cf660ad-d2cc-d275-7678-cbb32b0d4...@kge.pw>
>
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:09:36 +0100
> From: Konstantin Gizdov
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version
> Message-ID: <8cf660ad-d2cc-d275-7678-cbb32b0d4...@kge.pw>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 26/10/2018 19:07, Shay Gover
On 10/26/18 2:09 PM, Maksim Fomin via aur-general wrote:
> I see no such attitude. After reading this and previous thread the
> quote above expresses what happened quite neutrally: AUR package was
> used by group of people, after moving package to community, some
> things (important to that group)
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:09:50 +
Maksim Fomin via aur-general wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Friday, October 26, 2018 8:23 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general
> wrote:
> >
> > You did thank Felix, but then went on to make your true intent extremely
> > clear.
> > You
On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 20:48 +0300, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> I don't understand all the animosity towards the guy in the previous
> few emails.
There was a thread a while back that got a bit heated.
> Is assuming good faith really that far-fetched here? And even if it's
> not, why not be a
On 10/26/18 2:07 PM, Shay Gover via aur-general wrote:
>> First thing coming to mind: Did you possibly forget to update the .SRCINFO
>> file?
>
> Hoe do I update it from the PKGBUILD itself?
The PKGBUILD format is by definition separate from the .SRCINFO, you
don't update it automatically by the
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, October 26, 2018 8:23 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general
wrote:
>
> You did thank Felix, but then went on to make your true intent extremely
> clear.
> You specifically ask why your packages were moved (there doesn't have to be a
> reason), and say
On 26/10/2018 19:07, Shay Gover via aur-general wrote:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:29:59 +0200
>> From: Michael Kogan
>> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>>
>> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:29:59 +0200
> From: Michael Kogan
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Automatic package version
> Message-ID:
> <
> calsov+bp9ez_v_wfsv5mz9muaringnczxwyyx_1endofkj_...@mail.gmail.com>
>
On 26/10/2018 18:23, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:29:31 +0100
> Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
>
>> On 26/10/2018 15:27, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
>>> I must point out this very recent mailing list thread:
>>>
I don't understand all the animosity towards the guy in the previous few
emails. Is assuming good faith really that far-fetched here? And even if
it's not, why not be a little more professional about it?
On 26/10/2018 17:49, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/26/18 12:29 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
>> On 26/10/2018 15:27, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
>>> I must point out this very recent mailing list thread:
>>>
On 10/26/18 12:29 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
>> 3) Tell bald faced lies about how things transpired on the bug tracker.
> I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. In the many emails I wrote that
> evening, I got confused about one bug being closed, where it wasn't. You
> tried to call me out for lying
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 17:29:31 +0100
Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
> On 26/10/2018 15:27, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
> > I must point out this very recent mailing list thread:
> > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html
> >
> > In this thread, you:
> >
> >
On 10/26/18 12:49 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> I hereby swear to you, and will happily have it notarized if it makes
> you any happier, that I completely ignored your thread when reading your
> mailing list spam.
That is, when reading your reopen request.
--
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted
On 10/26/18 12:29 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote:
> On 26/10/2018 15:27, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
>> I must point out this very recent mailing list thread:
>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html
>>
>> In this thread, you:
>>
>> 1) whine about
On 10/26/18 12:26 PM, Shay Gover via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pakage in AUR that uses an automatic package versioning. I use a
> pkgver() and pkgrel().
> However I just noticed that the package version in AUR is old. I checked
> the functions and everything is OK. Running makepkg
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:26:43 +0300
Shay Gover via aur-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pakage in AUR that uses an automatic package versioning. I use a
> pkgver() and pkgrel().
> However I just noticed that the package version in AUR is old. I checked
> the functions and everything is OK.
First thing coming to mind: Did you possibly forget to update the .SRCINFO
file?
Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 18:27 Uhr schrieb Shay Gover via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pakage in AUR that uses an automatic package versioning. I use a
> pkgver() and pkgrel().
>
On 26/10/2018 15:27, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
> I must point out this very recent mailing list thread:
> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html
>
> In this thread, you:
>
> 1) whine about someone taking over *your* packages, because you're the one
Hi,
I have a pakage in AUR that uses an automatic package versioning. I use a
pkgver() and pkgrel().
However I just noticed that the package version in AUR is old. I checked
the functions and everything is OK. Running makepkg gives the correct
version.
The package is:
I must point out this very recent mailing list thread:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-September/034279.html
In this thread, you:
1) whine about someone taking over *your* packages, because you're the one that
knows them and has cared for them and, after all, they're
On 10/26/18 9:09 AM, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote:
> On 10/26/18 10:36 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> yesterday I received about 10 email notifications that my package
>> pass-git-helper-git was adopted by some random user, differing in each
>> email. Yet, the web interface
On 10/26/18 10:36 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> yesterday I received about 10 email notifications that my package
> pass-git-helper-git was adopted by some random user, differing in each
> email. Yet, the web interface shows myself as the maintainer and I never
> opened the package
Dear all,
yesterday I received about 10 email notifications that my package
pass-git-helper-git was adopted by some random user, differing in each
email. Yet, the web interface shows myself as the maintainer and I never
opened the package for adoption. Does anyone know what is going on here?
I
34 matches
Mail list logo
