Re: [aur-general] Submit updated package build to the AUR - hey

On 12/13/20 6:30 PM, Shyamin Ayesh via aur-general wrote: Hi, I'm new to this mailing list and don't know if I'm submitting the question to the right one. Please forgive me if I'm doing something wrong. I tried to submit new AUR package for the HTTP load testing tool called hey written in

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Change committer name

On 11/24/20 12:58 PM, Cyrusmg wrote: > Hi, > > could any Trusted User please change committer name for the latest commit I > have pushed for "eobcanka" package to "Cyrusmg " just like > I have in previous commits ? I have used my corporate identity and that's > not good. > "" > > It should be

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Evgeniy 'arcanis' Alekseev

On 11/8/20 12:48 PM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > Yo, > > I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of > Evgeniy Alekseev, also known as 'arcanis' on the grounds of 'Special Removal > of > an Inactive TU' [1]. > > Evgeniy's last action on archweb was

Re: [aur-general] This Saturday I was deprived the maintainer status of AUR package SGE without reason

On 10/12/20 4:40 PM, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > Dear AUR administrator, > > Can you please change me back to the maintainer of the AUR package SGE? > > This saturday I got two emails. One is user "freswa" disowned this > package, and then 19 minutes later, another email said this

Re: [aur-general] Lost user/pass on AUR site

On 9/16/20 9:52 AM, Fábio Emilio Costa via aur-general wrote: > Lost my password and user on AUR site. It was recommended to get help > here... Anything I need to provide? I think I used this email to > create it. There is indeed an AUR account with this email. Did you try the "forgot password"

Re: [aur-general] TU application - raster

On 9/7/20 6:59 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 8/23/20 9:47 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> On 8/23/20 4:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:34 +0100 Carsten Haitzler >>> said: >>> >>> Forgot to pgp sign... this reply is. >>> Hi Everyone. I'm Carsten - or Raster.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of sxiv-cdown-git

On 9/13/20 6:44 AM, Chris Down wrote: > Hi there, > > It seems this morning sxiv-cdown-git was deleted. It exists as a (small) > fork from sxiv with features geared towards using it as a photo manager > which Bert has indicated are different from his goals in mainline, not > merely a set of

Re: [aur-general] TU application - raster

On 8/23/20 9:47 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 8/23/20 4:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:34 +0100 Carsten Haitzler >> said: >> >> Forgot to pgp sign... this reply is. >> >>> Hi Everyone. >>> >>> I'm Carsten - or Raster. >>> >>> Sponsors: eschwartz and shibumi agreed to

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD with side-effects outside of build-dir

On 9/5/20 7:30 PM, Knut Ahlers wrote: > Hey there, > > Today I received a comment [1] on one of the packages I'm maintaining > asking for a change which I'm really not sure about: > > Basically the requested change is to have the build use an external > environment variable (if set) which allows

Re: [aur-general] Removing py2 (make-)dependency vs. keeping py2 features ?

On 8/27/20 11:11 AM, Michael Kogan wrote: > I had the same issue with the `medit` package. It's an editor with some > nice features, in particular, an integrated bash terminal. I have been > pointed to the fact that pygtk is deprecated some months ago, but removing > pygtk as dependency leads to

Re: [aur-general] TU application - raster

On 8/23/20 4:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:15:34 +0100 Carsten Haitzler > said: > > Forgot to pgp sign... this reply is. > >> Hi Everyone. >> >> I'm Carsten - or Raster. >> >> Sponsors: eschwartz and shibumi agreed to +1 me >> >> I'm upstream founder of enlightenment,

Re: [aur-general] Packaging ruby gems

On 8/9/20 4:59 PM, Anatoly Bashmakov via aur-general wrote: > Hello. > > I need feedback on packaging ruby gems. > > First, I don't think packaging every gem of the latest version makes a > lot of sense. For development there are rvm/rbenv/etc that solve this > problem. The only gems need to

Re: [aur-general] Help for AUR guides

On 8/3/20 12:27 AM, Budi via aur-general wrote: > May one submitted to AUR not binary but a bash script or function (a > quite fundamental, necessasry utility wrapper) instead ? As per the submission guidelines: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines "Make sure the

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR migration

On 7/24/20 3:24 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote: > Em julho 23, 2020 17:09 Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general escreveu: >> Hi All, >> >> In continuing with the improvements being done to our infrastructure, >> we're >> planning to migrate the AUR to another machine. This means

Re: [aur-general] know what dependencies in PKGBUILD

On 7/23/20 4:50 PM, Knut Ahlers wrote: > IMO you should add them as omitting packages required to run the > program will cause issues for people. Packages should request > everything they need to run. Isn't that exactly what I said? > As an example: All AUR packages I'm using on my machines are

Re: [aur-general] know what dependencies in PKGBUILD

On 7/23/20 4:07 PM, alad via aur-general wrote: > > On 23/07/2020 15:45, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 7/23/20 9:17 AM, alad via aur-general wrote: >>> Am 23/07/2020 um 15:10 schrieb Budi via aur-general: >>>> h\How to know what dependencies only ne

Re: [aur-general] know what dependencies in PKGBUILD

On 7/23/20 9:17 AM, alad via aur-general wrote: > Am 23/07/2020 um 15:10 schrieb Budi via aur-general: >> h\How to know what dependencies only need to put  (surely not all) > > I proceed as follows: > > 1. ignore anything in base-devel base-devel is for makedepends only, base is for depends. >

Re: [aur-general] Upgrade will install package from testing without having testing enabled, it breaks a dependency of a package from AUR

On 6/30/20 2:27 PM, marnout wrote: > Hi every body, > I got a similar error : This is not the same error. > sudo pacman -Suy > :: Synchronisation des bases de données de paquets… >  core est à jour >  extra est à jour >  community est à jour > :: Début de la mise à jour complète du système… >

Re: [aur-general] Upgrade will install package from testing without having testing enabled, it breaks a dependency of a package from AUR

On 6/30/20 2:10 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > when upgrading with 'pacman -Syu' I get 'Packages (3) firefox-78.0-1 > xorg-fonts-alias-misc-1.0.3-4 xorg-fonts-misc-1.0.3-9', but extra > provides xorg-fonts-misc 1.0.3-8, > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/xorg-fonts-misc/ , >

Re: [aur-general] Account suspension?

On 6/27/20 8:39 AM, Tom Hale wrote: > Hi Eli, > > On 27/4/20 10:20 pm, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> I'd be amenable to re-enabling your account with a warning to be more >> careful next time. However, I would appreciate it if you were to >> acknowledge the i

Re: [aur-general] Search-URL in PKGBUILD

On 6/3/20 8:26 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:11:32 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 6/3/20 8:06 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpanel-json-xs/#comment-749091 >>> >> What is a "search-UR

Re: [aur-general] Search-URL in PKGBUILD

On 6/3/20 8:06 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the default DLAGENTS settings in makepkg.conf [1], curl is > from the core repo and up to date [2]. > > Search-URLs never do work on my machine, see > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpanel-json-xs/#comment-749091 > > What is

Re: [aur-general] Create user

On 5/21/20 10:29 PM, karx via aur-general wrote: > Hey, > > An application I'm thinking about packaging for AUR requires its own user > to run. Is it ok to be/How would I go about creating a "user" that will be > created on the installer's system when they install the package? Use sysusers.d(5)

Re: [aur-general] When to use optdepends

On 5/14/20 1:53 PM, Markus Schaaf wrote: > Am 12.05.20 um 17:53 schrieb Eli Schwartz via aur-general: > >> I'd generally expect an optdepends for something which the program >> has a built-in ability to use simply by installing the optdepends. > > I'm sorry, but since y

Re: [aur-general] TU application; freswa

On 5/6/20 5:19 PM, Frederik Schwan via aur-general wrote: > Hi everyone, my name is Frederik aka freswa and I'm applying to > become a Trusted User with svenstaro's and grazzolini's sponsorship. > > I started using Linux around 2004 with some live images of Ubuntu. In > 2010, Debian became my

Re: [aur-general] When to use optdepends (was: AUR package q -- newbie)

On 5/12/20 9:55 AM, Markus Schaaf wrote: >> It's not really clear to me when to optdepend. > > Comments welcome. My idea is to use optdepends for things the user may > want, but it's not obvious how to make them work, like a glue-library > the application needs to use another facility, e.g. gpgme

Re: [aur-general] AUR package q -- newbie

On 5/12/20 3:04 AM, Markus Schaaf wrote: > If you look at the plugin's settings, there are a couple of commands > defined. One of which you are trying to use. The plugin's installation > doesn't depend on any of the programs that are setup by default for > these commands, because you may want to

Re: [aur-general] AUR package q -- newbie

On 5/11/20 10:09 AM, Raj Kombiyil via aur-general wrote: > Dear all, > Greetings! > Just finished my maiden install of arch-linux on my laptop, with my share > of headache. But things are running alright now, I guess. It's kind of > difficult to find packages in one place -- e.g.; I could install

Re: [aur-general] intel-opencl-sdk updated to 2020, probably poorly

On 5/5/20 1:46 PM, Nick Black via aur-general wrote: > Late last night, I put together an update to intel-opencl-sdk, > updating it from the 2017 edition to 2020. This was by far the > most difficult PKGBUILD I've ever done, and I suspect it is less > than optimal in one or more ways. > > If

Re: [aur-general] Account suspension?

On 4/27/20 10:49 AM, Tom Hale wrote: > Heya all, > > When logging in as "Ataraxy" at: > https://aur.archlinux.org/login > > The site says: "Account suspended" > > Can somebody tell me why my account is suspended, and if in error, > reactivate? Your account details shows you have a deleted

Re: [aur-general] User deletion request

On 3/31/20 3:14 PM, Giusy via aur-general wrote: > I've been banned from AUR, but I keep getting notification of package I > maintained on my email and that's annoying. > > Please delete my user. Thanks. What's your AUR username? Also, why were you suspended? Do you have anything you want to say

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mark packages that require significant computational power to build

On 4/3/20 3:24 PM, Nick Shvelidze wrote: > Hello everyone, as you know, some packages on AUR take many minutes to > build on all but very powerful machines. I think it would be helpful to > have an optional bit of metadata that will mark these packages, or possibly > even a general thing that will

Re: [aur-general] What is pkgrel and why/how should I use it?

On 3/3/20 6:28 PM, karx via aur-general wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 5:23 PM Doug Newgard via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:29:30 -0600 >> karx via aur-general wrote: >> >>> Hi Georg, thank you for your reply. >>> If I am understanding correctly,

Re: [aur-general] What is pkgrel and why/how should I use it?

On 3/3/20 3:50 PM, Alexander Fasching wrote: > On Tue, 2020-03-03 at 15:36 -0500, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 3/3/20 2:09 PM, karx via aur-general wrote: >>> Hello all, sorry if this is not in the appropriate mailing list. I >>> am >>> de

Re: [aur-general] What is pkgrel and why/how should I use it?

On 3/3/20 2:09 PM, karx via aur-general wrote: > Hello all, sorry if this is not in the appropriate mailing list. I am > developing an AUR package, and it says that pkgrel is a required field. > Right now, I simply leave it at 1, but I want to know how I should really > use it and what its purpose

Re: [aur-general] Anydesk 404 not found

On 3/1/20 12:56 PM, Frederick Zhang via aur-general wrote: > Sorry please ignore my last comment since apparently it was replaced by > anydesk-debian [1]. > > [1] > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2020-February/037952.html This... doesn't even make much sense at all. What is

Re: [aur-general] Question about AUR submission guidelines rule #1

On 2/27/20 10:36 AM, Lone_Wolf wrote: >    - packages that *remove *features. > > example : mesa-noglvnd[2] disables glvnd support but is otherwise the > same as extra/mesa of the same upstream version . > > Maybe change the wording to clarify this ? It has the feature of avoiding glvnd for

Re: [aur-general] Spring cleaning (moving orphaned packages from [community] to AUR)

On 2/25/20 10:22 AM, Alexander F Rødseth via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > It's time for the semi-yearly package cleanup of [community] packages, as > is tradition. > > I have gathered a list of "unneeded orphans" in [community] (packages that > currently has no maintainer, and no other

Re: [aur-general] CVEs Listing issue

On 2/24/20 1:12 AM, Vijay Kumar Kamannavar via aur-general wrote: > Hello Team, > > https://security.archlinux.org/issues/all is not listing all CVES. When you posted this message to the aur-dev mailing list, I suggested you post instead to the arch-general mailing list. This is not the

Re: [aur-general] review of getax2019 PKGBUILD

On 2/23/20 1:11 PM, Yoan Blanc via aur-general wrote: > Le dim. 23 févr. 2020 à 15:36, Bert Peters via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> a écrit : > >> On Sun, 2020-02-23 at 13:17 +0100, Yoan Blanc via aur-general wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've built my first PKGBUILD based on Brunio

Re: [aur-general] review of getax2019 PKGBUILD

On 2/23/20 7:17 AM, Yoan Blanc via aur-general wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've built my first PKGBUILD based on Brunio Renié's vaudtax, > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vaudtax/ > > https://gitlab.com/greut/getax > > Do you think I could propose it as is to aur-request? Do you see anything >

Re: [aur-general] Review of clickhouse-static PKGBUILD

On 2/10/20 5:02 AM, Felixoid via aur-general wrote: > Hello, dear TUs and Arch developers. > > I'd like to ask relative the package clickhouse-static[1]. The > officially supported way to build ClickHouse binaries is static > linking[2]. And my question: is it possible that the package with the >

Re: [aur-general] Issue python PKGBUILD

On 2/7/20 4:36 PM, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote: > Now I would like to get rid of the package contains reference to $srcdir > warnings. Any ideas? > > They are all .so files, and using strings I find there are always mentions to > .pyx and .cxx files using the full path. cmake embeds full paths

Re: [aur-general] Issue python PKGBUILD

On 2/6/20 6:10 PM, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote: > Hi, > > After a new release of a python module, I'm facing an issue to update the > PKGBUILD. I get a permission error in the package() section: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "setup.py", line 52, in > setup( > File

Re: [aur-general] AUR problem: 403 for white_dune package

On 1/24/20 4:17 AM, J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi >>> $ git clone ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git >>> Cloning into 'white_dune'... >>> a...@aur.archlinux.org: Permission denied (publickey). >>> fatal: Could not read from remote repository. >> Is your key added to the ssh-agent? > $ cat

Re: [aur-general] AUR problem: 403 for white_dune package

On 1/23/20 11:10 PM, J.Scheurich wrote: > Hi, > > > When i try > > $ git remote add white_dune ssh://a...@aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase.git > $ git push > fatal: unable to access 'https://aur.archlinux.org/white_dune.git/': The > requested URL returned error: 403 the "white_dune" remote you just

Re: [aur-general] EQ And Community Kindness

On 1/15/20 5:35 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 1/15/20 4:17 PM, michael Bostwick via aur-general wrote: >> Hi, >> This is my first time writing the mailing list, to be honest I would >> have preferred anther way of bringing this up, but *I didn't see an easy >> way to bring my concern to someone

Re: [aur-general] Being an asshole to package maintainers is a bannable offense, and that's okay (Was: EQ And Community Kindness)

On 1/15/20 6:07 PM, Brett Cornwall wrote: >> If you had moderator privileges on the AUR and could see the contents of >> the deleted comments -- of which there are many -- I suspect you'd >> rapidly understand why people are at the end of their tether. > > > The only directly mean comment I see

Re: [aur-general] EQ And Community Kindness

On 1/15/20 4:17 PM, michael Bostwick via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > This is my first time writing the mailing list, to be honest I would > have preferred anther way of bringing this up, but *I didn't see an easy > way to bring my concern to someone who's empowered to fix this strong > comment

[aur-general] Being an asshole to package maintainers is a bannable offense, and that's okay (Was: EQ And Community Kindness)

On 1/15/20 4:17 PM, michael Bostwick via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > This is my first time writing the mailing list, to be honest I would > have preferred anther way of bringing this up, but *I didn't see an easy > way to bring my concern to someone who's empowered to fix this strong > comment

Re: [aur-general] AUR Comment for white_dune

On 12/27/19 9:26 AM, J. Scheurich wrote: > $ git remote set-url origin a...@aur.archlinux.org:white_dune.git > $ git pull white_dune master > ssh: Could not resolve hostname 2a01: Name or service not known > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. > > Please make sure you have the correct

Re: [aur-general] AUR Comment for white_dune

On 12/27/19 3:46 AM, J. Scheurich wrote: > Hi, > > I dont understand the following: > > # Maintainer: J Scheurich > pkgname=white_dune > pkgver=1.654 > pkgrel=1 > epoch= > pkgdesc="white_dune X3D/VRML97 tool" > arch=() > url="ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.bz2; > ... >

Re: [aur-general] AUR Comment for white_dune

On 12/26/19 11:34 PM, J. Scheurich wrote: > Hi, >> Your remote URL looks wrong. You want to be using the username `aur`, not >> `mufti`, and the format is not like the one used on the web interface. >> I.e. >> >> git remote set-url origin a...@aur.archlinux.org:white_dune.git >> >> To change to

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On 12/25/19 5:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 23:30, Karol Babioch via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am 25.12.19 um 23:18 schrieb Anatol Pomozov via aur-general: >>> I remember discussions about using gitlab to manage

Re: [aur-general] Transition from split package to unsplit package

On 11/27/19 9:31 AM, Georg wrote: > Hi list, > > with the deprecation of Python2 ahead lots of packages currently built > as split packages for py2/py3 will have to transition to non-split > packages building only the py3 version, but this is not the only > scenario when this could be needed. >

Re: [aur-general] Updating AUR versions server side

On 11/3/19 12:39 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > What if regular, non development, AUR packages were tested server side > for new versions? > > Won't that make more sense than the maintainer having to run pkgver() > manually from time to time? We shall not evaluate

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git

On 10/30/19 4:38 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > AUR: >> Alad deleted aur-git: >> >> Why are you submitting this again after agreeing that a name change is >> in order? > > That was the original package which was there before the discussion, and > only one day has passed. > >

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On 10/29/19 1:22 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em outubro 29, 2019 14:09 Eli Schwartz via aur-general escreveu: >> >> Correction: there is "a blacklist", but it's only used to prevent >> namespace conflicts for users who attempt to upload packages named t

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On 10/29/19 4:07 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella via aur-general wrote: > Lukas Fleischer: >> Another one is that we'd prefer you to not use a name that sounds very >> official for a very unofficial project. > That sounds reasonable in theory, but in practice it does nothing. The > software does its

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On 10/29/19 1:06 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > Em outubro 29, 2019 12:55 Loui Chang escreveu: >> >> Please rename your project to avoid confusion. I'm surprised that the >> name >> wasn't already blacklisted. I would hope some TU does add 'aur' to the >> blacklist >> of package

Re: [aur-general] aur client

On 10/28/19 9:49 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: What is with your email headers, and the waves of duplicated email I just got. To: Arch Linux - Announcements , Arch Linux - General , Arch Linux - Projects , Arch Linux - AUR Development , Arch Linux - AUR General Do you have a good

Re: [aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS

On 10/23/19 3:22 PM, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote: > Reading again your message I am still not quite sure you are right. It should > be possible to install both adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4 at the same time so > both qt5 and qt4 apps use the theme. > > Besides, adwaita-qt4 installs adwaita.so in

Re: [aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS

On 10/16/19 4:22 PM, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote: > Hi, > > I recently adopted two packages from AUR: adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4. Today > @morealaz (who is maintaining adwaita-qt-git) asked me to edit some of the > arrays in the PKGBUILD (please read comments in the AUR website) and after >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: kpcyrd

On 10/11/19 4:27 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On 9/20/19 10:09 PM, kpcyrd wrote: >> Hello, >> >> My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx', >> sangys and jelles sponsorship. >> > > The voting period is over and we have a result: > > Yes: 39 > No:

Re: [aur-general] TU application: kpcyrd

On 10/7/19 10:59 AM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > On 10/4/19 9:29 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It's been 15 days (and a couple of hours as I'm aware) since, so the >> vote starts now: >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=119 >> > > > Reminder,

Re: [aur-general] package-base PKGBUILD with different architecture list for packages inside

On 10/5/19 7:48 AM, Attila Greguss via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I have a PKGBUILD Here > > > Is there a way to enable the commented out package in the PKGBUILD without > said package blocking the installation of the

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

On 9/26/19 1:49 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: > Vote is now over too, and the results are in: > > Yes: 42 > No: 1 > Abstain: 8 > > So, with a participation of 91.07% that meets the quorum, I can now say > “Welcome in the team!”. > > You can now proceed with >

Re: [aur-general] Why keeping OpenRC related packages on AUR?

On 9/16/19 12:38 PM, fredbezies via aur-general wrote: > Indeed! I just remember some manjaro related packages to be deleted > because they were using manjaro dependencies in some ways. Well, if the package in question can only be run on Manjaro (or only makes sense to run on manjaro), then that

Re: [aur-general] Why keeping OpenRC related packages on AUR?

On 9/16/19 10:38 AM, fredbezies via aur-general wrote: > Hello. > > Note: posting in the right mailing list now. Oops! > > I hope it is the right place to discuss about this issue. I noticed > there is a lot of OpenRC related packages on AUR. I don't want to > start a flamewar, I just want to

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

On 9/5/19 11:23 AM, Jonas Witschel wrote: > Hi all, > > my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the > AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User > under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter. > > A few words about myself: I am a math PhD student

Re: [aur-general] New package: disklow

On 9/2/19 6:50 AM, Khorne via aur-general wrote: > Few style things: > - remove unused directives > - packages always provide themselves Or as I prefer to describe it: Packages cannot logically provide themselves, they already *are* themselves. > More importantly it seems to me that you

Re: [aur-general] New package: disklow

On 9/2/19 7:31 AM, Holger Jahn wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your review. > >> You'll need to install the PerlArtistic license. > > What exactly do you mean by "install the license"? Put a copy of it into > the package? core/licenses provides

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for ipython

On 8/29/19 5:35 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote: > 2. Comments are absolutely random, but… I just think that when there > are no important changes in repository, just version bumps then no > comment can make sense. Of course I'm absolutely ready to rewrite > history to make them just normal

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On 8/18/19 12:26 AM, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote: >>> - This appears to me it's a -bin package >> >> Why? It looks like some sort of standard js-based source package on the >> NPM registry. >> > > well, judging from the lack of build() I'd assume so. I'm not too > familiar with npm, but if t is

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On 8/17/19 10:51 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:19:56PM -0400, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Thank you for your time, and thank you to all who help make Arch a great OS! > > Always happy to help! :) > > It's customary to review

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On 8/17/19 2:49 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote: > That said, I think its a bit unfair to say that I went off and found > another sponsor without batting an eye - asking Alexander and Sergej > seemed appropriate as they'd both adopted one of my packages, I had > worked with you to resolve

Re: [aur-general] kodi-devel-bin

On 8/17/19 5:30 AM, Ike Devolder wrote: > On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> @Ike, >> >> I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what >> seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps >> it might make sense to change the pkgname? > >

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On 8/16/19 3:19 PM, Jean Lucas via aur-general wrote: > Hi all, > > My name is Jean Lucas, and I'm sending this email to submit my candidacy > for Trusted User member. As per the latest TU bylaws, I'm being > sponsored by both Alexander Rødseth and Sergej Pupykin. > > I've been an Arch Linux

Re: [aur-general] Custom arch repository

On 8/16/19 11:42 AM, pavel.finkelsht...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > So I have the repo built (BTW, Travis CI is able to upload files to > pages by itself) here: > https://github.com/asm0dey/arch-kodi-devel-builder/tree/gh-pages/x86_64 > > It's built with `repo-add` command and looks

Re: [aur-general] Custom arch repository

On 8/14/19 10:01 AM, asm0dey via aur-general wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm looking for any description on how arch linux repository should be > organized. > I've found way to publish built packages to github pages, but it's > absolutely not enough to just put them somewhere. It looks like >

Re: [aur-general] kodi-devel-bin

On 8/12/19 2:48 PM, Paul Finkelshteyn wrote: > Of course my comment in there! Here it is: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kodi-devel-bin#comment-703544 Ugh, I'm sorry and I completely apologize. I totally misread that comment and may have only registered the first half. Maybe you could

Re: [aur-general] AUR package with prebuilt packages

On 8/12/19 2:33 PM, Paul Finkelshteyn wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:23:51 -0400 > Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> I think you can probably use github pages for this. Github already >> allows release assets, and there are definitely people putting release >> asse

Re: [aur-general] AUR package with prebuilt packages

On 8/12/19 2:12 PM, Paul Finkelshteyn wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:03:55 -0400 > Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> As kodi-devel-bin take almost forever to build I've created github >>> https://github.com/asm0dey/arch-ko

Re: [aur-general] kodi-devel-bin

On 8/10/19 8:04 AM, Luca Weiss via aur-general wrote: > Hi Pasha, > >> It looks like to me that all kodi-devel packages are named wrong. For >> example kodi-devel-bin isn't binary package. > > It looks like kodi-devel-bin is a subpackage of kodi-devel which contains > kodi-x11 and kodi-xrandr,

Re: [aur-general] kodi-devel-bin

On 8/10/19 4:42 AM, Paul M. Finkelshteyn via aur-general wrote: > Hi folks, > > It looks like to me that all kodi-devel packages are named wrong. For > example kodi-devel-bin isn't binary package. > > Is there some way to force renaming it? Yes, the first step is to talk to the maintainer of

Re: [aur-general] AUR package with prebuilt packages

> Hi folks, > > As kodi-devel-bin take almost forever to build I've created github > https://github.com/asm0dey/arch-kodi-devel-builder/ with pre-built > packages. > > Now I want to create AUR packages which will be able to install these > binary packages. No. > As you can see I have some

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Replacing package

On 8/5/19 6:02 PM, Rhys Perry via aur-general wrote: > I have a package (i3-gaps-rounded) and would like to rename it to > i3-gaps-rounded-git in order to comply with standards. What would I have to > add to the PKGBUILD of each packages in order to force people who have > installed

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Replacing package

On 8/5/19 6:19 PM, Chris Billington via aur-general wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:02 PM Rhys Perry via aur-general < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> I have a package (i3-gaps-rounded) and would like to rename it to >> i3-gaps-rounded-git in order to comply with standards. What would

Re: [aur-general] Advise on updating/uploading binary package

On 7/18/19 8:28 AM, Oon-Ee Ng via aur-general wrote: I've been using cin-git for a while (which draws on cinelerra-gg project). For those who are unfamiliar, there's the 'original' (old and out-of-date) cinelerra, and a newer cinelerra-heroine, and the most popular one is cinelerra-gg. The

Re: [aur-general] Trouble receiving email to reset password

On 7/17/19 3:16 PM, Etienne Wan via aur-general wrote: It worked this time. Thanks. Great! I am as surprised as you that my previous account did not exist anymore. I cannot remember when I created it, but I did not have much activity on it. How long ago is long ago? Before the 2015

Re: [aur-general] Trouble receiving email to reset password

On 7/17/19 9:32 AM, Etienne Wan via aur-general wrote: Hello, I had an account with the username etiennewan for some months now. I tried to login today but was not able to, so tried to send a reset email to the email address the account was registered with, but I did not receive anything. I

Re: [aur-general] Packages that include other project code

On 7/15/19 10:57 AM, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: I'd like a sanity check! Waybar has a dependency on a C++ logging library called spdlog. This project depends on fmt and by default uses an included copy. I've raised a ticket about removing this but it doesn't look like the developer

Re: [aur-general] The AUR package "svp" is suspicious

On 6/29/19 5:18 PM, Hirela via aur-general wrote: > TL;DR: The AUR package "svp" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/svp/) might > be injecting suspicious binary patches. > > Here are the relevant lines from the PKGBUILD version 4.3.0.165: > >     pkgver=4.3.0.165 >     >

Re: [aur-general] Copyrighted source on https://aur.archlinux.org/

On 6/25/19 1:20 PM, Jones, Philip via aur-general wrote: > 3) I am in contact with the US .gov site to get them to take down the > original tarball which is obviously the definitive action but that > will then leave you with a dangling link. If it is as popular as > indicate that may not be an

Re: [aur-general] Copyrighted source on https://aur.archlinux.org/

On 6/25/19 12:09 PM, Daniel Berjón Díez via aur-general wrote: > Hi Santiago, all, > > I'm very new to Arch and I don't know if the package I'm going to put > forward as an example violates itself any AUR rule, but for instance > 'ufsd-pro-dkms' [1] depends on a file that is not freely

Re: [aur-general] Copyrighted source on https://aur.archlinux.org/

On 6/25/19 10:53 AM, Jones, Philip via aur-general wrote: > Jerome > > I appreciate that the package > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libccmio/) is not hosted on the > site but if you Google " libccmio-2.6.1.tar.gz" it is the top hit. This sounds like an SEO problem, have you tried

Re: [aur-general] How to name llvm trunk packages tailored to work with mesa trunk ?

On 5/8/19 8:41 AM, Lone_Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > > llvm-git (and it's predecessor llvm-svn) is intended to provide a full > implementation of the llvm/clang compiler suite. It's a huge package > that takes a lot of time and processor capacity to build. > > While mesa needs llvm, it only needs a

Re: [aur-general] Kernel version requirement

On 5/7/19 3:25 PM, Julien Nicoulaud via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > In the oomd package , I put a > linux>=4.20 dependency requirement since it requires the new resource > pressure metrics introduced in > linux

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 5/3/19 1:09 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote: > They came for mesa-git, did not took care about which dependency were > pulled. They update mesa-git, but don’t think of llvm-git because they > were never informed this is especially relevant for mesa-git. If they break their system by installing packages

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

On 5/7/19 1:13 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > This thread went way beyond what it should have gone. This is the AUR > we're talking about. > I'm not saying we should accept any crap on the AUR, but, I'm talking > from my own experience here, > we don't always anticipate what will

  1   2   3   4   5   >