Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: How do I show a AUR Rebuild as a newer build?

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, October 22, 2018 11:47 AM, Tinu Weber wrote: > More generally, however, what would be the best approach to applying > downstream/user-specific changes without breaking the versioning? The > ones I know all have some issue: > I must be misreading this,

Re: [aur-general] intellij-idea-community-edition

> (I'm not sure whether I'm posting to the correct mailing list.) > I'm a happy user of IntelliJ IDEA. Unfortunately, the community > package intellij-idea-community-edition is out-of-date most of the > time. As of writing, it has been updated at 2018-07-10 and flagged pycharm-community user here

Re: [aur-general] upgrade of "conf.d/*.conf"-style packages containing example configs

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On May 31, 2018 10:00 PM, J. Konrad Tegtmeier-Rottach via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > I've run into a general issue with software packages that use a > configuration directory, aggregate configs therein using a glob rule > on the filenames, and contain an example

Re: [aur-general] Please remove gsmartcontrol-svn package from AUR

Original Message On February 14, 2018 3:46 PM, Simon Doppler do...@dopsi.ch wrote: >On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 15:29:29 CET Eli Schwartz via aur-general >In this case, he should not publish the development code anyway, since nothing > will stop users from submitting bug

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

Original Message On January 19, 2018 11:52 AM, David Runge wrote: >Fwitw (and sorry for hijacking), I recently tried xprintidle (with a forked >upstream, different from the one in the AUR) and it seems to work. > This might still be used in a script to lock