Re: [aur-general] TU application - orhun

And thusly ends this tumultuous discussion period. The time has come to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=127 xoxo, Sven OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Anyone want to have netdata?

Hey, I don't really use netdata anymore. Does anyone want to pick it up? I'd drop it to AUR otherwise. Cheers, Sven OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU application - orhun

Hello, I have no idea who this is and I haven't talked to this user before. However, considering they maintain a lot of Rust software, I think they're safe and would make a great addition to the team. Just kidding. I talked to Orhun a fair bit, went over the majority of their packages and I

Re: [aur-general] AUR migration

On 23.07.20 22:09, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote: > Hi All, > > In continuing with the improvements being done to our infrastructure, we're > planning to migrate the AUR to another machine. This means that, during > the migration, > there *will* be downtime of the whole AUR. > > I

Re: [aur-general] TU application; freswa

On 06.05.20 23:19, Frederik Schwan via aur-general wrote: > Hi everyone, > my name is Frederik aka freswa and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with > svenstaro's and grazzolini's sponsorship. > > I started using Linux around 2004 with some live images of Ubuntu. In 2010, > Debian became

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 23:41 Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > Per discussion with Sven-Hendrik I am going to become maintainer for > these packages. > > Aaand the first batch of changes (switching gitlab to ruby 2.6) has > landed [community-testing]. Please give it a try and send feedback if > you

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 09:26 Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hello Sven-Hendrik > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:47 AM Sven-Hendrik Haase > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019, 18:14 Sébastien Luttringer > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 01:51 +0100, Sve

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019, 18:14 Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 01:51 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general > wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 01:43, Anatol Pomozov < > > Because Docker+EE works flawlessly and reliably while upstream breaks the >

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 01:43, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 2:20 PM Sven-Hendrik Haase > wrote: > >> > I maintain the official gitlab packages gitlab, gitlab-gitaly, > >> > gitlab-runner, gitlab-shell, git

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 23:47, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em dezembro 25, 2019 19:36 Karol Babioch via aur-general escreveu: > > > > Announcing this on main site as dedicated news entry is probably > > overkill? At least it would get some attention and potentially some new > > maintainer could

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 23:30, Karol Babioch via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 25.12.19 um 23:18 schrieb Anatol Pomozov via aur-general: > > I remember discussions about using gitlab to manage our (future) git > > repos. If we want to go this route then we need to

Re: [aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 at 23:18, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 11:00 PM Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general > wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I maintain the official gitlab packages gitlab, gitlab-gitaly, > > gitlab-runner, gitlab

[aur-general] Dropping official gitlab packages

Hi guys, I maintain the official gitlab packages gitlab, gitlab-gitaly, gitlab-runner, gitlab-shell, gitlab-workhorse and python-gitlab. Out of these, I'll be dropping gitlab, gitlab-gitaly, gitlab-shell and gitlab-workhorse because they are way too much work to maintain and I can't keep up and

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif

On 08.10.19 14:35, David Runge wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal > of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive > TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's > developer status. >

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 01:35, Josef Miegl wrote: > On August 16, 2019 10:05:54 PM GMT+02:00, "Balló György via aur-general" < > aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, unity-editor and unityhub are > >proprietary software with restrictive license. I don't think

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

ore sense to do it this way because the > engine is a big self contained blob and users usually need to have several > different versions installed at the same time to patch old projects etc. > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 22:20 Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general < > aur-general@ar

Re: [aur-general] TU membership application

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 22:06 Balló György via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > 2019. 08. 16, péntek keltezéssel 15.19-kor Jean Lucas via aur-general > ezt írta: > > If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the > > following packages (all having over 10 votes

[aur-general] New build server for TUs and devs

Hi all, Thanks to Hetzner sponsoring our new server [0] we now have a new box with 48 threads, 128 GiB RAM, and 2 NVMes in RAID0 with a total of 1.75 TiB of storage. Should be plenty fast for the time being. The new server is now available at dragon.archlinux.org for all of your package building

Re: [aur-general] Trusted user application: Drew DeVault

On 25/02/2019 00.23, Drew DeVault wrote: > Hiya! Jerome convinced me to finally apply for TU, and Sven-Hendrik > agreed to co-sponsor my application (both Cc'd). > > I'm a generalist that works on free software full time. I maintain the > following AUR packages: > >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: a-wing

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 9:13 AM Chih-Hsuan Yen via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > Brett Cornwall via aur-general 於 2018/12/25 下午3:54 寫道: > > > > On December 25, 2018 12:50:41 AM MST, Metal A-wing <1@233.email> wrote: > >> I want to push `ruby-rails` and `ruby-*` packages to

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Konstantin Gizdov

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 22:34 Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hello, > > I am Konstantin Gizdov [1] [2], > (`kgizdov`, `a...@kge.pw`, `kgiz...@gmail.com`) > > I would like to apply to be a Trusted User under Baptiste Jonglez's > sponsorship. > > A few words about me: > > I am currently a Particle

[aur-general] Does anyone want to maintain the GNUstep packages?

The gnustep-* packages are currently orphaned. Only oolite depends on it but I don't really care much about either. Does anyone want to maintain the gnustep packages? If I don't hear anything until the end of the month, I'll drop them as well as oolite to the AUR.

[aur-general] Hey everyone,

I'll be on vacation for 2 weeks starting today. Feel free to update my packages. Sven

Re: [aur-general] Can we have optional deps on AUR packages?

On 19 April 2017 at 20:36, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > P.S. I noticed that for ansible you already started mentioning the AUR > in optdeps. Why start implementing it before we actually came to a > solution?! > Because I'm going to have the optdeps there anyway and in this thread

[aur-general] Can we have optional deps on AUR packages?

I just wanted to clear this up with the other TUs: Is it ok for [community] packages to have optional deps on AUR packages or not?

Re: [aur-general] Stepping down as a TU

On 31 January 2017 at 14:02, Михаил Страшун <pub...@dicebot.lv> wrote: > On 01/31/2017 12:37 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> Farewell! Thanks for your maintainership. What will happen to the D stuff >> now? > > Thanks! > > Well, either someone else de

Re: [aur-general] Stepping down as a TU

On 27 January 2017 at 12:48, Михаил Страшун wrote: > Hello, > > For a while I have been maintaining packages related to D programming > language, motivated by being involved with the upstream. As the latter > has come to its end I feel it be would appropriate to revoke my TU >

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Johannes Löthberg via aur-general wrote: > On 04/08, Balló György via aur-general wrote: >> >> 2016. 07. 28, csütörtök keltezéssel 12.13-kor Balló György ezt írta: >>> >>> 2016. 07. 23, szombat keltezéssel 10.45-kor Balló György ezt

Re: [aur-general] Autostart of program on installing via install file

Yeah, that package should definitely not be doing that. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Lex Black wrote: > Hi > > I stumpled upon an AUR package where the install file executes the > installed program[0]. > My assumption is, managing the start of services is done by the

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Pierre Neidhardt

On 13.10.2015 10:59, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: Great, I'm very happy to read this! Thank you very much and see you around! :) On 15-10-12 17:58:43, Alexander F Rødseth wrote: The vote is over and the results are: Yes: 24 No: 4 Abstain: 4 Congratulations and welcome to our latest TU, Pierre

Re: [aur-general] Feedback for rmlint-git and call for a TU

No, sorry, I'm quite busy. I will try to get to this tomorrow. On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, christop...@ira-kunststoffe.de < christop...@ira-kunststoffe.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if this sounds impatient: Are there any news on this? > > > Am Di, 22. Sep, 2015 um 5

Re: [aur-general] Feedback for rmlint-git and call for a TU

Sounds like a pretty cool software. Will take a look later. On Sep 22, 2015 16:42, "christop...@ira-kunststoffe.de" < christop...@ira-kunststoffe.de> wrote: > Hello, > > Im the developer of rmlint (http://rmlint.rtfd.org) and mantain also the > rmlint-git AUR package

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On 05.01.2015 17:52, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 31.12.2014 21:29, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On December 31, 2014 7:20:02 PM CET, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: [reposted to the correct list, oops] Hi list My name is Jerome Leclanche and this is my application for becoming

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On January 6, 2015 9:16:55 AM CET, Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:52:49PM +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 31.12.2014 21:29, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On December 31, 2014 7:20:02 PM CET, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: [reposted

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On 31.12.2014 21:29, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On December 31, 2014 7:20:02 PM CET, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: [reposted to the correct list, oops] Hi list My name is Jerome Leclanche and this is my application for becoming an Arch Linux TU. Both Balló György and Sven

Re: [aur-general] Qt4 / Qt5 package naming

On 18.04.2014 11:29, Jerome Leclanche wrote: Hi With Qt5 becoming more and more available throughout Qt apps (especially as KDE progresses into the switch), I think it's time to consider adopting an updated naming scheme. IMHO: - Qt4 apps should use the -qt4 suffix - Qt5 apps should not

Re: [aur-general] removing mingw32 packages from the AUR

On 19.03.2014 20:55, Daniel Micay wrote: The mingw64 toolchain supports building for both 32 and 64-bit Windows, and is included in the official repositories. I don't think there's much reason to keep around the mingw32 packages as it's more broken than mingw64 across the board and simply not

Re: [aur-general] TU application sponsored by David Reisner

On 03.02.2014 20:29, Daniel Micay wrote: On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote: - add android-sdk-* packages. Current AUR packages download binaries and install binaries to /opt/bin. The binaries are 32-bit. Instead we should build SDK from sources and

Re: [aur-general] Changes in Arch packaging standards

On 06.12.2013 10:45, Sergej Pupykin wrote: At Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:42:11 +0001, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: I would change that rule a bit, because wxgtk is a special case. The 2.9 branch is a devel branch, keeping wxgtk for the stable branch and adding a suffix for the devel

Re: [aur-general] Changes in Arch packaging standards

On 06.12.2013 11:31, Sergej Pupykin wrote: At Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:22:35 +, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: Sensitive topic: Why doesn't arch support multiple versions for the same packages? Another sensitive topic is removing packages without notification refering to nonexistent

Re: [aur-general] teamspeak3 package

On 11.09.2013 20:56, Jerome Leclanche wrote: Wheres the teamspeak3 package gone? If it was deleted, why? J. Leclanche It's in [community] now.

Re: [aur-general] Adding some low voted packages to [community]

On 15.08.2013 22:09, Florian Pritz wrote: Hi, I'd like to add the following packages (+ deps) to [community]: smokeping, echoping, spampd, mailgraph, postfwd, python-ansi2html (AUR package is out-of-date, I have a fixed one) I use them, they are awesome and I don't want to have to check

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote: [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase] [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot] [IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net] Hello, Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote: [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase] [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot] [IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net] Hello, Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User and taking care of packages related to D

Re: [aur-general] TU application

On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote: [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase] [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot] [IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net] Hello, Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User and taking care of packages related to D

Re: [aur-general] community/python2-flask conflicts python-flask

On 27.05.2013 22:36, Zack Buhman wrote: I was in the process of creating a python3 package [1] for flask, but I've noticed python2-flask [2] seems to conflicts+replace python-flask. I imagine this was for historical reasons, but this introduces probably unintentional behavior when a package

Re: [aur-general] community/python2-flask conflicts python-flask

On 28.05.2013 00:28, Zack Buhman wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:19:49AM +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: Next time please just contact me directly for tiny things like these. I'll keep this in mind. This should be considered a bug. I fixed the package and pushed it. Thanks. However

[aur-general] Putting bumblebee and friends into [community]

Hi, I'd like to gather some opinions on this. I was thinking about putting bumblebee, primus and bbswitch into [community] as it doesn't look as though nvidia is going to fix this properly in their driver any time soon. I know about the GPL symbol drama and the supposed fix that is in mainline

Re: [aur-general] Disowning synergy

On 23.02.2013 11:14, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Hi TU's, I am disowning synergy, since I don't use it with my current setup and can't test it properly. Is anyone interested in maintaining it else I will move it into AUR. I will take over.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

It would seem that voting period is over. Alucryd is now a TU! I've updated your user account. Please follow the new TU guidelines on the wiki. Make sure to get into IRC, get your key signed, tell someone to update your account on the bug tracker and the forums.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On 30.01.2013 21:09, Maxime Gauduin wrote: Hi all, My name is Maxime Gauduin, I'm 23 and I live in France where I work as a chemical engineer. I've been using Arch Linux for almost 2 years now, and have been thinking about applying for a TU position for a while. Recently I was contacted by

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On 30.01.2013 21:09, Maxime Gauduin wrote: Hi all, My name is Maxime Gauduin, I'm 23 and I live in France where I work as a chemical engineer. I've been using Arch Linux for almost 2 years now, and have been thinking about applying for a TU position for a while. Recently I was contacted by

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On 30.01.2013 23:07, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: Confirming that I'm indeed sponsoring this dude. Let's discuss. Er I might wanna sign that. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Status of openshadinglanguage

On 28.01.2013 21:55, Chirantan Ekbote wrote: Hello, When I tried to upgrade blender today I got an unresolved dependency error for openshadinglanguage. After some searching I found it in [community-testing] [0]. It's been in there since 2013-01-03 and appears to be an orphaned package.

Re: [aur-general] ode-dp can be deleted

On 05.12.2012 16:20, SanskritFritz wrote: The ode-dp package [1] is obsolete since extra/ode is compiled with double-precision. It is orphaned for this reason. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ode-dp/ Deleted.

Re: [aur-general] i want to maintain some packages which is out-of-date,

On 05.12.2012 04:29, Jove Yu wrote: i am JoveYu i want to maintain some packages which is out-of-date,but i can't get in touch with their maintainer ,so i hope you can help me https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wineqq/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deepin-media-player/

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 26.10.2012 03:52, Schala Zeal wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57314 Currently packaging DirectX 10 FPC bindings, and changed the package name to be DX-version neutral. Ok.

Re: [aur-general] aur and systemd service files

On 14.10.2012 05:11, skydrome wrote: Im not sure if this has been asked/answered yet as i couldnt find a previous question. When installing service files in aur packages, even if the service file hasnt changed the user will be met with Unit file foo changed, it is recommended to run

[aur-general] About to drop bacula

I'm going to be dropping bacula to AUR soon as I don't use it and I keep bug reports on it. I don't currently have a working bacula set up so it might be better off in someone else's hands. I'll give it a few days before dropping it in case another TU wants to take over.

Re: [aur-general] Anybody interested in maintaining courier stuff in [community]?

On 13.10.2012 03:35, Eric Bélanger wrote: On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: On 05/15/2012 08:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: I recently changed away from using courier but as they are server packages they need close maintenance because

Re: [aur-general] GLU rebuilds

On 12.10.2012 22:12, Andreas Radke wrote: This is a reminder. TUs, please finish the glu rebuilds. I'd like to move this Xorg/Mesa stuff soon out of testing. -Andy Can't, Python 3.3 is blocking Blender.

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation: Chris Brannon

On 07.10.2012 17:30, Chris Brannon wrote: Hello all, I regret that it has come time for me to resign from Arch Linux, at least for now. I have a lot of things going on in my life, with a new job, a major cross-country move, and so forth. I haven't really been attending to my Arch

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request for xd

On 07.10.2012 16:07, Andreas Wagner wrote: Hi, I have posted a working PKGBUILD in the comments on August 5th and the maintainer has still not updated it. I would like to adopt it. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10517 Thanks, Andreas Wagner Go ahead.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel

On 04.09.2012 19:58, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 01.09.2012 01:40, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: Ok chaps, time's up. Let's vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=60 The vote is still going but we could effectively stop it right there because it's impossible to change the decision

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel

On 01.09.2012 01:40, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: Ok chaps, time's up. Let's vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=60 The vote is still going but we could effectively stop it right there because it's impossible to change the decision at this point even if every remaining TU voted no. Can we

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - loemu

On 02.09.2012 23:18, Jonathan Steel wrote: Please remove loemu; it is over four years old and has been broken for over a year. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11093 Thanks Last commit was 4 years ago. Deleted. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel

Ok chaps, time's up. Let's vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=60 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Jonathan Steel

This is correct, I'm sponsoring this guy. At the same time, I'd like to speculate that voting would merely be a formality as this person was the world champion im Mario kart. I think it goes without saying that this would be an incredibly important strategic asset by itself. We could

Re: [aur-general] Looking for a sponsor

On 08/09/2012 02:43 PM, jsteel wrote: Yes I am very capable of doing this [1]. I have thoroughly read the PKGBULD man page and wiki entry and also about creating packages and standards. I do have one question, and that is the use of curly brackets. I find people recommending and not

Re: [aur-general] Looking for a sponsor

On 08/09/2012 12:56 AM, jsteel wrote: Hi, In October 2011 I sent an email to register my interest in becoming a TU [1] (thinking that was the next step to get involved) and I received some helpful responses of how I can be more involved with Arch, without jumping in as a TU right away.

Re: [aur-general] Concerning mingw-w64-qt

On 08/06/2012 09:15 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: I was hoping to get mingw-w64-qt placed into multilib or community repo because today I had built the package, but it took approximately TEN HOURS to do so. This is because it builds static release, static debug, shared release, and shared debug for

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Andrzej Giniewicz (giniu)

On 07/13/2012 07:41 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: With 13 yes votes, 1 no vote, and 5 abstain votes, I would like to welcome Andrzej (giniu) as a new tu. Welcome on the crew. Let's have a man hug.

Re: [aur-general] Can wine-rawinput be orphaned so I may update/maintain it?

On 07/10/2012 03:21 PM, x...@electricjungle.org wrote: did you contact the maintainer by email ? else please do and contact us back if there was no response for two weeks or sooner if you get a response. thx --Ike As I mentioned in the first post, I attempted to contact the maintainer

Re: [aur-general] Anybody interested in maintaining courier stuff in [community]?

On 05/15/2012 08:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: I recently changed away from using courier but as they are server packages they need close maintenance because they are critical to some people. I wondered whether any TU would like to take them over? I will maintain them for some time to come

Re: [aur-general] Structure and naming of packages

On 06/15/2012 02:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Hi, (I'm not sure if this post belongs here or perhaps to aur-dev, sorry for confusion.) Is there any convention regarding structure and naming of packages? I have a project implemented in C, which consist of a library and collection of

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On 06/08/2012 06:04 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: lib32-dmd [1] was replaced with lib32-dmd1-complete, both provided by same maintainer. As confirmed by the maintainer, the package should be deleted. Please delete lib32-dmd [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55413 Done.

Re: [aur-general] Building a git version of a package already present in the official repositories

On 05/26/2012 12:58 PM, Muflone wrote: Hello In the AUR section of the Arch Packaging Standards guide [1] we can read that a package must not build any of applications in the official repositories. At the moment the extra/strace 4.7-1 package uses the most updated released version of the

Re: [aur-general] AUR KDE clean up – part 3

On 05/25/2012 11:12 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: Please remove the following KDE related packages. [1]keep: Upstream site/src-tarball has been nuked Nuked. [2]kickass: -||- Gone. [3]kio-fuse-svn: Broken, for kde3, orphan, only 1 vote Gone. [4]kio_p7zip: orphan, out-of-date, broken, comment

[aur-general] Anybody interested in maintaining courier stuff in [community]?

I recently changed away from using courier but as they are server packages they need close maintenance because they are critical to some people. I wondered whether any TU would like to take them over? I will maintain them for some time to come but I might eventually drop them if they don't get a

Re: [aur-general] Catalyst/Nvidia cleanup

On 05/11/2012 09:33 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: #Please remove the following out-of-date/old versions of catalyst #packages. None of them probably builds with the current stock kernels, #and mostlikely need really old version of X.org [1]catalyst-beta [2]catalyst-ice [3]catalyst-leaked

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: evilvte-hidetab

On 04/16/2012 07:34 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: It[1] is outdated and abandoned by its submitter. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35006 Done. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: terminal-urgency

On 04/16/2012 07:57 PM, Jekyll Wu wrote: It[1] is outdated and unmaintained. The download link is also broken (for me). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20847 Done. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR

SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems to be active. Thanks SanskritFritz I don't use the package and didn't want to update it. Also upstream is

Re: [aur-general] Vegastrike games orphaned in the AUR

SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.comwrote: SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth

Re: [aur-general] Inactive user tdy

On 03/31/2012 02:47 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: No worries. If he's inactive, nothing has happened with any of his packages for a while, he has several outdated packages and does not reply to e-mails, I think we should consider the user as inactive and orphan all the packages. Any other

Re: [aur-general] Remove requests

On 03/10/2012 11:24 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: Well, unfortunately this time one simple typo I overlooked caused a new package to be generated in the AUR. Please remove it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57479 Done. Did you forget to upload your GPG key, by the way? signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] Remove requests

On 03/10/2012 06:08 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: On 03/10/2012 02:47 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 03/10/2012 11:24 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: Well, unfortunately this time one simple typo I overlooked caused a new package to be generated in the AUR. Please remove it: https://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Adopt AUR-Package

On 02/06/2012 04:03 PM, nobody44 wrote: Hi, I would like to adopt the git-cola package in the AUR. I tryed to contact the maintainer (tdy), without success. Would a trusted user please orphan it for me? With kind regards nobody44 Done. Next time link the packages. I also orphaned

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] metslib-newest

On 01/15/2012 02:53 PM, Krzysztof Grygiencz wrote: Hi, Please delete my package [1] metslib-newest because I'll update metslib to stable branch (0.5) and nuke 0.4 (buggy branch). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739 Regards, Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz) Nuked from orbit.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request: perl-goo-canvas

On 12/25/2011 02:14 PM, Shanto wrote: perl-goo-canvas: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22821 * Package has broken dependencies since October 2011. * Marked out of date for 2 weeks (since 11th December). * Several comments with needed fix, but no response from t...@gmx.com. I am

Re: [aur-general] removal request - nvtv

On 12/18/2011 08:22 PM, Stefan Wilkens wrote: Please remove. name: nvtv aur link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4234 reason: no changes since 2006, no longer workable with latest xserver, segfaults on latest nvidia driver, no patches available. thanks. Sounds reasonable to me.

Re: [aur-general] Cross-compilers naming scheme

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/17/2011 04:29 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: If someone hasn't spot it yet, we have mess with naming of cross-compilers in [community]. Currently there are 3 schemes: 1) $appname-$platform (gcc-avr and binutils-avr) The only problem I see

Re: [aur-general] Developer/TU key signing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2011 02:27 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: Hi, my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887. Every packager please do: 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Sébastien Luttringer

Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote: On 11/22/2011 01:05 PM, Seblu wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats and welcome! - Alexander Thank you for your trust. It's going to be awesome! no it won't :) -- Ionuț Don't listen to ioni.

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

On 11/19/2011 07:44 PM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: I have a lot of regret doing this, and I have been working hard to find the time to keep up with my TU duties, but every day I have less and less time because work is continually ramping up, and what free time I have left ends up going to Salt

Re: [aur-general] Resigning as a TU

On 11/21/2011 06:43 AM, Jan Steffens wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Hello, I want to resign as a TU. I do not have the time anymore to fulfill my TU duties and to handle the new package signing stuff. By the way I suggest to remove

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Hi TUs, may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]? It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last updated on 2010-12-21. Meanwhile the third update was released by upstream. The latest version in [community] is 0.7, the

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 18 novembre 2011 19:40:15, Sven-Hendrik Haase a écrit : Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: Hi TUs, may I request an update of supertuxkart in [community]? It's already flagged as out-of-date since 2011-04-15 and was last

Re: [aur-general] Update request for supertuxkart

On 11/19/2011 06:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100 schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com: A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that. It would at least need to conflict. This is what

Re: [aur-general] AUR cleanup

On 07.11.2011 18:41, Nicola Bignami wrote: I see that there are more than 6700 orphan packages. Of those, more than 2400 are also flagged out of date (some packages have not been updated since 2007). Many packages are only waiting for a new maintainer but I think that many are only waiting to

  1   2   3   >