Hi All,
I had a feeling this matter would balloon out of proportion, so I took a
screenshot of the comments http://i.imgur.com/nA5cK.png before they were
deleted. After these, the next two were supplied by Alexander (xyproto)
before he wiped them all. The first of these seems to be a bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Xavion xavio...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I had a feeling this matter would balloon out of proportion, so I took
a
screenshot of the comments http://i.imgur.com/nA5cK.png before they
were
deleted. After these, the next two were supplied by
On 18/12/12, Xavion wrote:
| I had a feeling this matter would balloon out of proportion, so I took a
| screenshot of the comments http://i.imgur.com/nA5cK.png before they were
| deleted.
I actually think your screenshot shows xyproto had really valid points,
and you're being a total drama
On 12/18/12, Xavion xavio...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't ignore your comment; I responded to it within a day.
You did not modify the pkgbuild to match the best practices that TUs
recommend. My apologies for confusing not acting on with
ignoring.
By the way, thanks for attempting to pick faults
Xavier,
It's pretty obvious to all but the bleakest of minds that you deleted the
first round of comments because I defeated all of your arguments and made
you look silly.
That's laughable.
It will be interesting to see whether you have the balls to
admit to deleting this isolated
Hello,
You guys only have half the story here.
Xavion has been really obnoxious:
- Saying things like let me remind you that you're not a TU to a
friendly comment from another user on AUR, suggesting that he did not
host his script/application directly in the package
- Asking if the people
Alexander Rødseth wrote:
In the end, after much back and forth, the comments for the
popular-packages package on AUR was filled with discussion about
where and how the script should be hosted, sprinkled with random
insults, with _nothing of interest what so ever_ for casual users that
just wanted
You guys only have half the story here.
If this is the case, do what forum moderators do and leave a little note
explaining what was moderated away and thus why moderation took place to
begin with. This goes a long way to dispelling he-said-she-said crap,
especially when the moderated user
On 2012-12-15 19:52 -0500
Dave Reisner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:22:25AM +1100, Xavion wrote:
Dear TUs Devs,
For obvious reasons, I decided to add the following comment to my
popular-packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/webpage on the
AUR recently: As I'm
Dear TUs Devs,
For obvious reasons, I decided to add the following comment to my
popular-packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/webpage on the
AUR recently: As I'm the author of this little script, I
will always want it to remain in the AUR.
However, I just noticed that
On 12/15/12, Xavion xavio...@gmail.com wrote:
However, I just noticed that the comment has been removed. I'm assuming
that Alexander (xyproto)
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xyprotoprobably did this
(silently) as he's the one who removed all prior comments
a couple of days earlier.
I'm a
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:22:25AM +1100, Xavion wrote:
Dear TUs Devs,
For obvious reasons, I decided to add the following comment to my
popular-packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/webpage on the
AUR recently: As I'm the author of this little script, I
will always
12 matches
Mail list logo
