On 1/22/24 14:43, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:24:04 +0100
Robin Candau wrote:
On 1/22/24 00:47, Aaron Liu wrote:
Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
warrants bumping the pk
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:24:04 +0100
Robin Candau wrote:
> On 1/22/24 00:47, Aaron Liu wrote:
> > Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
> > different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
> > warrants bumping the pkgrel,
> Here it is not q
On 1/22/24 00:47, Aaron Liu wrote:
Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
warrants bumping the pkgrel,
Here it is not question of changing the license but simply switching the
current license
Changing the license does indeed change the package, as it means that
different license files are installed, though I'm not sure whether that
warrants bumping the pkgrel, and spamming the same comment across
several packages by the same maintainer is certainly disruptive. That
said, I've only s
I've been going through my 400+ AUR packages updating the license to match SPDX
license requirements.
xiota has decided a pkgrel bump is required if one updates the license. He has
begun spamming the same comment on 9 of my AUR packages so far. I've already
told him to stop here:
https://aur.a
