Request #11941 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11986 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
On 07/08/2018 08:28 AM, Arjun Nemani wrote:
> I am sorry, I am new to AUR and arch in general. I wanted to create a
> script with php-pear installation, but there is a bug in the PKGBUILD
> File. So I thought I would reupload it with a different name. Do you
> have any suggestion how i could do
Request #11859 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11857 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11981 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11982 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11894 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1]:
Merging this package into the git one.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11980 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11974 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11892 has been accepted by Eschwartz [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Request #11884 has been rejected by Eschwartz [1]:
maintainer updated
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/
Is it possible to read and save info about desired branch/repo from some
config, e.g. ~/.config/linux-amd-git-branch?
ср, 11 лип. 2018, 13:55 користувач Yurii Kolesnykov
пише:
> Yes, it's mostly the same. Thank you for mentioning other branches. I hope
> to create different packages for this
arisinfenix [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-twolame [2]:
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-twolame/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arisinfenix/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-twolame/
Yes, it's mostly the same. Thank you for mentioning other branches. I hope
to create different packages for this branches.
Now I just manually switch the branch to most recent one, e.g. 4.19-wip ->
4.19 -> drm-next in second package.
Now I think to create linux-amd-staging-wip, that points to
Request #11880 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11875 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11876 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11871 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11908 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11868 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The user Foxboron deleted the package.
Request #11901 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11872 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11887 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11889 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11870 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11906 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11873 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #12015 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2017-10-16.
codyps [1] filed a orphan request for rpm-org [2]:
Package is several months out of date (and has been marked as out of
date for several months).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/codyps/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rpm-org/
Request #11752 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11734 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
dufferZafar [1] filed a orphan request for slit [2]:
1. This is VERY old & outdated package.
2. It should atleast be renamed to slit-git since it builds from
source and doesn't download binaries.
3. The maintainer hasn't listed their email ID.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dufferZafar/
Request #11831 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #11733 has been accepted by Foxboron [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/
Request #12012 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User
Repository package request system:
The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2017-11-09.
nyghtly [1] filed a orphan request for bastet [2]:
This package has been out of date for a long time.
Updated build instructions in the comments should be preserved.
However, someone needs to fix the PKGBUILD so that it will work
without additional effort.
[1]
adam900710 [1] filed a request to merge ckan-bin [2] into ckan [3]:
Since now ckan is maintained properly, it would be nice to merge this
two packages.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/adam900710/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ckan-bin/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ckan/
greyltc [1] filed a deletion request for kicad-scripting-git [2]:
my new package, kicad-rc, means this one is not needed anymore
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/greyltc/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kicad-scripting-git/
cbb [1] filed a deletion request for dex-editor [2]:
Upstream hasn't made a commit in nearly 3 years. There's an improved
and actively maintained fork that's also available via AUR
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dte/) and basically supersedes
this package.
[1]
40 matches
Mail list logo
