Re: [Aus-soaring] Archives

Thank Mark. Justin Sinclair 17 Queen st Scarborough Qld 4020 Mob 0421061811 Hm 07 3885 8949 Sent from iPhone > On 21 Apr 2016, at 09:28, Mark Newton wrote: > >> On 21 Apr 2016, at 7:03 AM, Optusnet wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I

Re: [Aus-soaring] Archives

On 21 Apr 2016, at 7:03 AM, Optusnet wrote: > > Hi all, > > I can see the achieves of the old list but I can seem to get one from the > base64 list. The archives were never maintained by us, they were a third-party org that discovered the list by web-crawling,

Re: [Aus-soaring] skyboard

Not a problem if he is at height: he just pulls the ripcord of his chute, then spends his last seconds thinking, “Oh F**k, it’s not a chute, it’s a fuel tank” J From: Aus-soaring [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.base64.com.au] On Behalf Of Gary Stevenson Sent: Thursday, 21 April 2016 12:09 AM

Re: [Aus-soaring] T as a mandated instrument

On 21 Apr 2016, at 5:52 am, Justin Couch wrote: > We don't get to pick and choose how we interpret "relevant" rules when we > don't like one that is not in our favour. I looked through at least another > dozen gliders of varying age. All state cloud flying permitted, none,

[Aus-soaring] Archives

Hi all, I can see the achieves of the old list but I can seem to get one from the base64 list. Any ideas. Justin Sent from my iPad ___ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au http://lists.base64.com.au/listinfo/aus-soaring

Re: [Aus-soaring] T as a mandated instrument

On 20/04/2016 10:23 PM, Roger.D wrote: Dear Justin What a nonsense that the CASA inspector(s) foisted on you. That's an incorrect assumption that CASA were involved in this at any point. If you read the TCDS for the Standard Jantar 2 and the TCDS for the Standard Jantar 3 then it is clear

Re: [Aus-soaring] skyboard

Hi All, Having looked at the video, and thought about this for a bit now, I will posit just one thought, given that no earlier postee has even touched on it. If the images are real, then the pilot is totally fu*ked in the head. The flyboard is one thing, and although I have not looked

[Aus-soaring] T as a mandated instrument

Dear Justin What a nonsense that the CASA inspector(s) foisted on you. If you read the TCDS for the Standard Jantar 2 and the TCDS for the Standard Jantar 3 then it is clear at point 8 "Operational Capability" that these sailplanes are rated for "VFR Day", and below that "Cloud flying" which

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fun with Form 2 Inspections and paperwork

On 20/04/2016 9:31 PM, Ben Coleman wrote: Justin, it's not clear to me whether the actions are "or" or "and". For example if my water ballast gear is unserviceable, do I need to label the lever and have it locked by a Form 2 inspector, or just choose one action? The way I read that, it is

[Aus-soaring] Fun with Form 2 Inspections and paperwork

Hands up how many of you fly PZL aircraft? Put your hand down if you have a T fitted. Hmmm... no change in raised hands. OK, how many of you know that your aircraft has been technically illegally flying in Australia the whole time? Ahh. no hands up. Yeah, so... my club got audited last

Re: [Aus-soaring] flap settings/Dynamis

LS6 has L,+10,+5, 0 and for negative it is 0 to -5 but there is no notches, you just leave the handle where you feel it should be. From: Aus-soaring [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.base64.com.au] On Behalf Of Mike Borgelt Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:55 PM To: Discussion of issues

Re: [Aus-soaring] flap settings/Dynamis

On 20/04/2016 5:17 PM, james dutschke wrote: Mike Pik20b has -8 to +90 in 2 degree increments. So I guess that makes it 49. Always one in the crowd :) ASW20 has 5 all up. I've only worked on a B, so not sure of the other variants. -- Justin Couch

Re: [Aus-soaring] flap settings/Dynamis

Mike Pik20b has -8 to +90 in 2 degree increments. So I guess that makes it 49. :-) James. On 20 Apr 2016 4:55 PM, "Mike Borgelt" wrote: > Thanks again everyone. > > I just need the number of performance (excluding landing flap) flap > positions not the actual