Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

..lets not go near recording and archival requirements please. > > From: Noel Roediger <mailto:roedi...@internode.on.net> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 9:11 PM > To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' > <mailto:aus-soaring@lists.base64.com.au> >

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

of recording fact. You'll be included. Regards Noel. From: Aus-soaring [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.base64.com.au] On Behalf Of emillis prelgauskas Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:22 AM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission Partly true Reg but I would have expected some due diligence to be applied. Here is some fairly standard wording of conditions applied to awards processes. (bolding is mine) “To preserve

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

> aspect of my post. This outrage must be addressed somehow! > > Bob Ward > > From: Richard Frawley > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 6:18 PM > To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission > > from wha

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

from what i have told Flarms were developed as a commercial venture. Sure Nigel applied the technical know how, but that is the business he is in and still is. finding anyone to back a venture is tough. Harry put a sizeable lot of cash at risk into this. Having backed a few ventures,

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

Very well put Bob from another bloke 50 years continuously in GFA. If it were skiing lift passes we would be free for us Bob. Ian McPhee 0428847642 Box 657 Byron Bay NSW 2481 On 23 Jul 2016 7:46 pm, "Bob Ward" wrote: > > > > I seldom post on this site but feel strongly

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

to approach a nominee in confidence beforehand which in the case at hand would have been beneficial. Chris From: Reg Moore Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 2:41 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission The probable reason that Nigel

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

very true. tim was asking for months. > On 24 Jul 2016, at 2:41 PM, Reg Moore wrote: > > The probable reason that Nigel wasn't considered for an award was that he was > not nominated. The GFA Executive and Board can only issue awards to persons > nominated they are not

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

Hear hear EP. From: emillis prelgauskas Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:52 AM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission This is indicative of the dilemma about corporate knowledge, as each generation succeeding the one before

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

This is indicative of the dilemma about corporate knowledge, as each generation succeeding the one before only knows what they know, and records that for posterity. Like the re-imagining of the history of the sport’s formation and early growth by the late Maurice Little when the current magazine

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

Well said Bob. Noel. From: Aus-soaring [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.base64.com.au] On Behalf Of Bob Ward Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 7:17 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission I seldom post on this site

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

are not always perfect particularly when they were not personally involved, All the best, Harry, To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has essentially been

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

GFA could award Nigel next year. Maybe no one nominated him! On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Bob Ward wrote: > > > > I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has > essentially been insulted by Harry’s award. As Harry pointed out, the >

Re: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

From: Bob Ward Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 7:46 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: [Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has essentially been insulted by Harry’s award. As Harry pointed out

[Aus-soaring] Fw: Nigel's omission

I seldom post on this site but feel strongly that Nigel Andrews has essentially been insulted by Harry’s award. As Harry pointed out, the associated comments in the announcement were correct. Harry did finance the development of Aus Flarm when he had confidence that Nigel was on to something