> On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
> wrote:
>
>Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:12:03 -0500
>From:"Garrett Wollman via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
>
>Message-ID: <25117.15011.846137.211...@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
>
>
Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:12:03 -0500
From:"Garrett Wollman via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <25117.15011.846137.211...@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
| FreeBSD's ash behaves in the way you think the standard requires (as
| of 12.3, what I have easily
< said:
> Hi,
> wait is specified as:
>If one or more pid operands are specified that represent known process
>IDs, the wait utility shall wait until all of them have terminated.
> In no shell does the wait utility appear to behave this way. To test
> this, in an interactive shell, I
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20120311T02
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20120311T02
[reply restricted to list]
At 2022-02-28T13:34:09+, Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open
Group wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote:
> >
> > Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 +
> > From:Jonathan Wakely
> > Message-ID:
> >
> >
> >
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote:
> >
> > Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 +
> > From:Jonathan Wakely
> > Message-ID:
> >
> >
> > | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
> >
> >
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote:
>
> Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 +
> From:Jonathan Wakely
> Message-ID:
>
>
> | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
>
> Not explicitly, no. But if I read some code, and then write
> something
Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 +
From:Jonathan Wakely
Message-ID:
| Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
Not explicitly, no. But if I read some code, and then write
something similar, how would I ever prove I had not copied?
If I did, even
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 14:56, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
>
> OK. I have looked at the coreutils realpath man page (gnu licensing
> stupidity means I cannot look at their code),
Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
10 matches
Mail list logo