Re: wait and stopped jobs

2022-02-28 Thread Don Cragun via austin-group-l at The Open Group
> On Feb 28, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group > wrote: > >Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:12:03 -0500 >From:"Garrett Wollman via austin-group-l at The Open Group" > >Message-ID: <25117.15011.846137.211...@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> > >

Re: wait and stopped jobs

2022-02-28 Thread Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:12:03 -0500 From:"Garrett Wollman via austin-group-l at The Open Group" Message-ID: <25117.15011.846137.211...@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> | FreeBSD's ash behaves in the way you think the standard requires (as | of 12.3, what I have easily

wait and stopped jobs

2022-02-28 Thread Garrett Wollman via austin-group-l at The Open Group
< said: > Hi, > wait is specified as: >If one or more pid operands are specified that represent known process >IDs, the wait utility shall wait until all of them have terminated. > In no shell does the wait utility appear to behave this way. To test > this, in an interactive shell, I

Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403

2022-02-28 Thread Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20120311T02

Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403

2022-02-28 Thread Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open Group
BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20120311T02

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001457]: Add readlink(1) utility

2022-02-28 Thread G. Branden Robinson via austin-group-l at The Open Group
[reply restricted to list] At 2022-02-28T13:34:09+, Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote: > > > > Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 + > > From:Jonathan Wakely > > Message-ID: > > > > > >

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001457]: Add readlink(1) utility

2022-02-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote: > > > > Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 + > > From:Jonathan Wakely > > Message-ID: > > > > > > | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code. > > > >

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001457]: Add readlink(1) utility

2022-02-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote: > > Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 + > From:Jonathan Wakely > Message-ID: > > > | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code. > > Not explicitly, no. But if I read some code, and then write > something

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001457]: Add readlink(1) utility

2022-02-28 Thread Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 + From:Jonathan Wakely Message-ID: | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code. Not explicitly, no. But if I read some code, and then write something similar, how would I ever prove I had not copied? If I did, even

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001457]: Add readlink(1) utility

2022-02-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 14:56, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: > > OK. I have looked at the coreutils realpath man page (gnu licensing > stupidity means I cannot look at their code), Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.