Re: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
2022-12-08 17:31:54 +, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group: [...] > > Is there any plan of adding the accompanying -z options of > > grep/sort/ls/sed/cut... (see also the --files0-from of some GNU > > utilties or the awk -v RS='\0' -v ORS='\0' that some awk > > implementations

Re: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Geoff Clare wrote in : |Stephane Chazelas wrote, on 08 Dec 2022: |> 2022-12-08 15:39:32 +, Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l \ |> at The Open Group: |> [...] |>> It is looking like the group might decide to add find -print0 and \ |>> related |>> xargs and read features (for

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001614]: XSH 3/mktime does not specify EINVAL and should

2022-12-08 Thread Don Cragun via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Robert & Geoff have been arguing about whether or not giving a struct tm to mktime() that specifies a time in the gap between standard time and daylight time is allowed to be treated as an error (assuming that the seconds since the Epoch would otherwise fit in a time_t). Robert is arguing that

Re: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Stephane Chazelas wrote, on 08 Dec 2022: > > 2022-12-08 15:39:32 +, Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The > Open Group: > [...] > > It is looking like the group might decide to add find -print0 and related > > xargs and read features (for reasons I won't go into here). > [...] >

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001614]: XSH 3/mktime does not specify EINVAL and should

2022-12-08 Thread Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Robert Elz wrote, on 06 Dec 2022: > > Date:Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:01:52 + > From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group" > > > | You have completely > | ignored my earlier email (austin-group-l:archive/latest/35115) where > | I stated that for TZ values

Re: strftime %Ou

2022-12-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Did this email make it to the list? Should I have asked/reported this another way? On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 16:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > In draft 2.1 (and the current spec) strftime's %Ou modified spec is described > as: > > %Ou Replaced by the weekday as a number in the locale’s

Re: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open Group
2022-12-08 15:39:32 +, Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group: [...] > It is looking like the group might decide to add find -print0 and related > xargs and read features (for reasons I won't go into here). [...] That's good news. Would you go over those reasons here

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000243]: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=243 == Reported By:dwheeler Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000243]: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=243 == Reported By:dwheeler Assigned To:

Minutes of the 5th December 2022 Teleconference

2022-12-08 Thread Andrew Josey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
All Enclosed are the minutes of the Monday meeting this week. The next meeting is Monday 12th. regards Andrew --- Minutes of the 5th December 2022 TeleconferenceAustin-1278 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 8th December 2022 Attendees:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000243]: Add -print0 to "find"

2022-12-08 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=243 == Reported By:dwheeler Assigned To: