Geoff Clare wrote, on 14 Sep 2020:
>
> Mark Harris wrote, on 12 Sep 2020:
> >
> > > | Solaris uses "Reply-To:" to replace just "From:"
> > > | (although it has "R" and "r" the wrong way round!)
> >
> > This is controlled by the POSIX-standard mailx variable "flipr". It
> > can be set
Hello.
This was vivious, it ends up as
Cc: The, POSIX, maintainers:, ;, Robert Elz
upon reply time here. That is what happens if you join and split
and join and split from strings to (address) objects and way back,
loosing all the information along the way.
It also came in as an empty
Date:Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:37:31 +0200
From:Steffen Nurpmeso
Message-ID: <20200915133731.cpghp%stef...@sdaoden.eu>
Quoting RFC822:
| the presence of the "Reply-to" field SUPERSEDES the sending
| of a reply to the person named in the "From" field.
I suspect
Robert Elz wrote in
<21450.1600163...@jinx.noi.kre.to>:
|Date:Mon, 14 Sep 2020 23:09:21 +0200
|From:"Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group" \
|
|Message-ID: <20200914210921.h1m8r%stef...@sdaoden.eu>
|
|| This is of course very primitive
Date:Mon, 14 Sep 2020 23:09:21 +0200
From:"Steffen Nurpmeso via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <20200914210921.h1m8r%stef...@sdaoden.eu>
| This is of course very primitive handling and does not take care
| for RFC 2822, no Sender: handling, etc.
Geoff Clare wrote in
<20200914090031.GB11999@localhost>:
|Robert Elz wrote, on 12 Sep 2020:
|>
|> How you can manage to reconcile this in the standard, more precisely
|> that saying "the r and R commands reply to the current message, using
|> different, but otherwise unspecified, addresses
Mark Harris wrote, on 12 Sep 2020:
>
> > | Solaris uses "Reply-To:" to replace just "From:"
> > | (although it has "R" and "r" the wrong way round!)
>
> This is controlled by the POSIX-standard mailx variable "flipr". It
> can be set system-wide (/etc/mail.rc) or per-user ($HOME/.mailrc).
Date:Sat, 12 Sep 2020 19:30:22 +0200
From:Steffen Nurpmeso
Message-ID: <20200912173022.shnqc%stef...@sdaoden.eu>
| I do not know how you can say this. (If it last your original
| address entirely, where is the improvement?)
It is at least now directing replies
Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote in
<12525.1599844...@jinx.noi.kre.to>:
|Date:Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:59:26 +0100
|From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group" \
|
|Message-ID: <20200911145926.GA7856@localhost>
...
|| rfc2822
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote in
<20200911145926.GA7856@localhost>:
|Although Andrew asked us to take this to the offtopic list, I would
|like instead to bring it back on topic, by making it about mailx.
|
|The descriptions of the "R" and "r" commands in mailx say
> | Solaris uses "Reply-To:" to replace just "From:"
> | (although it has "R" and "r" the wrong way round!)
>
> The original BSD "Mail" did it that way, I have no idea when they
> swapped cases, that is 'r' was a "small" reply, and "R" a "big" reply...
>
> But almost everyone uses "big"
Date:Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:59:26 +0100
From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <20200911145926.GA7856@localhost>
| Although Andrew asked us to take this to the offtopic list, I would
| like instead to bring it back on topic, by making
12 matches
Mail list logo
