On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 12:01 +, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at
The Open Group wrote:
> I haven't been able to come up with a common initial statement that
> is preferable to just describing the two methods separately. So
> unless someone else wants to give it a go, I suggest that I should
>
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 10:48 +, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at
The Open Group wrote:
> > -
> > (0005094) psmith (developer) - 2020-11-03 15:23
> > https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1325#c5094
> >
> > Regarding the
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1325
==
Reported By:dmitry_goncharov
Assigned To:
Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
wrote:
> > I wrote a blog post about this which may be interesting:
> > http://make.mad-scientist.net/papers/advanced-auto-dependency-generation/
>
> Having read this, I'm now wondering why we are bothering to add
> requirements for generating
> --
> (0005096) psmith (developer) - 2020-11-03 15:31
> https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1325#c5096
> --
> Apropos of the example given here: I just
Geoff Clare wrote, on 04 Nov 2020:
>
> > > If a target rule or inference rule for the pathname has been parsed
> > > before the include line is parsed, make shall use the rule to attempt
> > > to create the file or to bring it up-to-date.
> >
> > I don't think this is quite correct. In GNU make,
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 16:47 +, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at
The Open Group wrote:
> Having read this, I'm now wondering why we are bothering to add
> requirements for generating include files, if it is no longer the
> recommended way of doing things.
There are other uses for
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1325
==
Reported By:dmitry_goncharov
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1325
==
Reported By:dmitry_goncharov
Assigned To:
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 18:05 +0100, Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l
at The Open Group wrote:
> I am not sure whether I missed something, but I cannot see a method
> that may work in a portable way and unless I missed something, I see
> no new idea that makes things really better than what we are
> --
> (0005094) psmith (developer) - 2020-11-03 15:23
> https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1325#c5094
> --
> Thank you for all your effort Geoff! I
11 matches
Mail list logo
