A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1117 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                geoffclare
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2
Issue ID:                   1117
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Clarification Requested
Severity:                   Comment
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     New
Name:                       Geoff Clare 
Organization:               The Open Group 
User Reference:              
Section:                    command 
Page Number:                2596 
Line Number:                84278, 84294 
Interp Status:              --- 
Final Accepted Text:         
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2017-01-20 10:03 UTC
Last Modified:              2018-06-30 09:31 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Use of "implementation-defined" in command -v / -V
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0004049) geoffclare (manager) - 2018-06-30 09:31
 http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1117#c4049 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The term "implementation-provided" is already used in several other places.
 It even has an explanation in XRAT A.1.5:<blockquote>The term
``implementation-defined’’ implies requirements for documentation [...]
In some places the text refers to facilities supplied by the implementation
that are outside the standard as implementation-supplied or
implementation-provided. This is not
intended to imply a requirement for documentation. If it were, the term
``implementation-defined’’ would have been used.</blockquote>
There is already a reference to 2.9.1.1 (as quoted under Description in
this bug). 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     New Issue                                    
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     Name                      => Geoff Clare     
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     Organization              => The Open Group  
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     Section                   => command         
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     Page Number               => 2596            
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     Line Number               => 84278, 84294    
2017-01-20 10:03 geoffclare     Interp Status             => ---             
2018-06-29 18:42 kre            Note Added: 0004048                          
2018-06-30 09:31 geoffclare     Note Added: 0004049                          
======================================================================


Reply via email to