On 6/24/19 12:31 PM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> 2019-06-24 11:52:56 -0400, Chet Ramey:
> [...]
>>> Before going in the details of the language, can we at least
>>> agree on what the "intention" should be?
>>
>> Your intention is obvious. It's in the part I quoted.
>>
>> Pathname expansion is
On 6/24/19 11:49 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> Just tried with the current head of the devel branch from today
> (5.0.7(5)-maint).
>
> In an empty dir:
>
> $ mkdir -m a=r readable
> $ mkdir -m a=x searchable
>
> $ bash5 -c 'printf "%s\n" */.'
> searchable/.
> $ bash5 -c 'printf "%s\n" */\.'
>
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1252
==
Reported By:eggert
Assigned To:
Harald van Dijk wrote:
> That aside, I asked you last time you made this claim about POSIX to
> back it up. There is no requirement for standard utilities to be
> implemented portably. You responded then:
>
> > POSIX intends to create portability at source code level.
> >
> > Code that is not
The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001253.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1252
==
Reported By:eggert
Assigned
The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001252.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1253
==
Reported By:eggert
Assigned
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1252
==
Reported By:eggert
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1251
==
Reported By:mohd_akram
Assigned To:
Harald van Dijk wrote, on 27 Jun 2019:
>
> On 27/06/2019 10:04, Geoff Clare wrote:
> >Stephane Chazelas wrote, on 26 Jun 2019:
> >>
> >>Or again, forget all about it and treat the ksh93 behaviour as
> >>non-compliant as is already the case.
> >
> >I'm starting to think that this is what we
2019-06-27 10:48:20 -0400, Chet Ramey:
> On 6/27/19 2:15 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
>
> > I could be convinced that it makes sense for the ksh93 X(...)
> > operators to be allowed if there was one non-anecdotal
> > implementation of fnmatch() that implemented it, but I don't
> > think there it.
10 matches
Mail list logo