Minutes of the 22nd February 2021 Teleconference

All Enclosed are the minutes from today’s call regards Andrew --- Minutes of the 22nd February 2021 Teleconference Austin-1105 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 22nd February 2021 Attendees: Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC

Austin Group teleconference +1 888 974 9888 PIN 618 156 403

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//opengroup.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.22.1// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 TZNAME:EDT DTSTART:20120311T02

[Issue 8 drafts 0001417]: Need to make sure that makefiles with += and ?= are portable to all make implementations

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 373. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1417 == Reported By:joerg Assigned

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000373]: make should allow dash in macro names

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001417. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=373 == Reported By:eblake Assigned

[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001414]: rewind() clears the error indicator, but when?

The following issue has been UPDATED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1414 == Reported By:kre Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001416]: Misuses of "may" on the getrlimit() page

The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1416 == Reported By:geoffclare Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001414]: rewind() clears the error indicator, but when?

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1414 == Reported By:kre Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001387]: Should EAGAIN be acceptable for malloc failure?

The following issue has been UPDATED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1387 == Reported By:rhansen Assigned To:

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001454]: Conflict between "case" description and grammar

On 22/02/2021 13:13, Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: "Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group" wrote: $ bosh -c 'case x in ( (x) echo match ;; esac' bosh: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected It may be that you are missinterpreting the results.

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001454]: Conflict between "case" description and grammar

"Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group" wrote: > >> $ bosh -c 'case x in ( (x) echo match ;; esac' > >> bosh: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected > > > > It may be that you are missinterpreting the results. > > I'm not. You say there's no state change that happens as a

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001454]: Conflict between "case" description and grammar

On 22/02/2021 09:51, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: I think your suggestion works, but having a separate production to add the ')' seems unnecessary. I'd also rename "pattern" since it is really just WORD that constitutes a pattern to be matched. So how about this:

Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/Issue7+TC2 0001454]: Conflict between "case" description and grammar

Harald van Dijk wrote, on 21 Feb 2021: > > On 19/02/2021 16:21, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: > > It may be prudent to clarify matters by rearranging things in the > > grammar so that it ends up saying "Do not apply rule 4" when a '(' > > has just been seen, like it does