On 22/02/2021 09:51, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
I think your suggestion works, but having a separate production to
add the ')' seems unnecessary. I'd also rename "pattern" since it is
really just WORD that constitutes a pattern to be matched.  So how
about this:

   case_item_ns      : pattern_list ')' linebreak
                     | pattern_list ')' compound_list
                     ;
   case_item         : pattern_list ')' linebreak     DSEMI linebreak
                     | pattern_list ')' compound_list DSEMI linebreak
                     ;
   pattern_list      :                  WORD /* Apply rule 4 */
                     |              '(' WORD /* Do not apply rule 4 */
                     | pattern_list '|' WORD /* Do not apply rule 4 */
                     ;

Sure, that looks just fine to me. I tried avoiding having only one of '(' or ')' part of the pattern (now pattern_list) rule for readability reasons, but if you prefer a shorter grammar instead, that makes sense to me too.

Cheers,
Harald van Dijk

  • Re: [1003.1(2016/18)/... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: [1003.1(2016... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: [1003.1(... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Donn Terry via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: [1003.1(2016... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re: [1003.1(... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Joerg Schilling via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • Re: [100... Harald van Dijk via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to