On 04/07/2021 21:54, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Sun, 4 Jul 2021 19:26:25 +0100
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <40fc0b0c-364f-8ff8-0613-a76c887d4...@gigawatt.nl>
| P.S.: The fact that the underlying file descriptor of standard output is
| fd 1 rather than
Date:Sun, 4 Jul 2021 10:31:06 +0100
From:Stephane Chazelas
Message-ID: <20210704093106.2ce2cyg77f2nm...@chazelas.org>
| That would make is non-compliant then.
s/is/it/ ... and yes, so?
| SUS> When there are multiple key fields, later keys shall be
There was
Date:Sun, 4 Jul 2021 19:26:25 +0100
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <40fc0b0c-364f-8ff8-0613-a76c887d4...@gigawatt.nl>
| I think the definition of "write", in Base Definitions, tries to say so,
To a degree, yes, but I don't think that actually adds anything to
On 04/07/2021 18:32, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote:
Date:Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:45:40 +0100
From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <20210701104540.GA4023@localhost>
| it just requires pwd to write the
Date:Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:45:40 +0100
From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <20210701104540.GA4023@localhost>
| Because it is a precondition of this discussion. I.e. what we are
| debating is what is the required behaviour if pwd
2021-07-04 15:47:55 +0700, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group:
[...]
> which is the way it should be - if one has taken the trouble to specify
> what parts of the record are the keys for sorting (and -u comparisons)
> then sort should not be gratuitously adding more - that it used to
2021-07-04 15:47:55 +0700, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group:
> Date:Fri, 2 Jul 2021 14:41:50 +0100
> From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
>
> Message-ID: <20210702134150.GB16587@localhost>
>
> | I've always assumed that the
Date:Fri, 2 Jul 2021 14:41:50 +0100
From:"Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group"
Message-ID: <20210702134150.GB16587@localhost>
| I've always assumed that the intention for -c is to answer the
| question "if I ran this command without -c would the
2021-07-04 07:21:08 +0100, Stephane Chazelas via austin-group-l at The Open
Group:
[...]
> Note that the equivalent --transform in the GNU implementation
> of tar lets you specify whether to apply the transformation to
> {sym,hard}links or not with flags.
[...]
Actually, libarchive's bsdtar
2021-07-03 18:43:40 -0700, Michael Forney via austin-group-l at The Open Group:
[...]
> I'm working on an implementation of the pax tool, and am looking
> for some clarification of how (if at all) the -s option should
> interact with symlink targets.
[...]
See also:
10 matches
Mail list logo
