On 28/09/20 14:36 +, shwaresyst wrote:
The 2018 edition is the latest ISO/IEC/IEEE version, in that it was balloted and approved
to keep the IEEE "current standard" clock from timing out. The 2008 edition
plus TCs is now the prior version, in the formal sense.
Is that not in the ISO
— Portable Operating
System Interface (POSIX), Technical Corrigendum 2
Thanks!
--
Nick
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 7:42 AM Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at
The Open Group wrote:
On 24/09/20 15:28 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am
Hello,
I am writing a proposal for the ISO C++ standard committee (WG21) to
update the reference to the POSIX standard in the C++ International
Standard. My colleague Eric Blake suggested I ask on this list whether
anybody here has any comments on the proposal.
The draft is at
On 24/09/20 15:28 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a proposal for the ISO C++ standard committee (WG21) to
update the reference to the POSIX standard in the C++ International
Standard. My colleague Eric Blake suggested I ask on this list
On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 14:56, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
>
> OK. I have looked at the coreutils realpath man page (gnu licensing
> stupidity means I cannot look at their code),
Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:34, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote:
> >
> > Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 +
> > From:Jonathan Wakely
> > Message-ID:
> >
> >
> > | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
> >
> >
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 13:03, Robert Elz wrote:
>
> Date:Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:28:20 +
> From:Jonathan Wakely
> Message-ID:
>
>
> | Nothing in any GNU licence prevents reading code.
>
> Not explicitly, no. But if I read some code, and then write
> something
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 07:10, Oğuz via austin-group-l at The Open Group <
austin-group-l@opengroup.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 24, 2023, enh via austin-group-l at The Open Group <
> austin-group-l@opengroup.org> wrote:
>
>> netbsd checks that _PATH_BSHELL is exectuable with access(2)
>>
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 15:53, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
> Aside from that possibility the only reason would seem to be the same
> as why echo (real ones) have -n (and trashy ones have \c) and why
> printf(1) needs a \n to print one ... there are times that it is
Did this email make it to the list? Should I have asked/reported this
another way?
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 16:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> In draft 2.1 (and the current spec) strftime's %Ou modified spec is described
> as:
>
> %Ou Replaced by the weekday as a number in the locale’s
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 12:11, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
>
> Jonathan Wakely wrote, on 08 Dec 2022:
> >
> > Did this email make it to the list? Should I have asked/reported this
> > another way?
>
> It made it to the list, but the la
In draft 2.1 (and the current spec) strftime's %Ou modified spec is
described as:
%Ou Replaced by the weekday as a number in the locale’s alternative
representation
(Monday=1).
Should that say "as a number using the locale's alternative numeric
symbols"?
Otherwise the definition is circular.
As well as the "it shall work, even if it must be magic" fix for the
sockaddr aliasing problems, has any consideration been given to a
named function for accessing the sa_family_t fields?
inline sa_family_t getsockfam(const struct sockaddr* sa) {
sa_family_t fam;
memcpy(, (char*)sa +
At the ISO C++ committee meeting this week we hope to vote this change
into C++23:
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3869
The current C++ standard (aka C++20) refers to ISO/IEC 9945:2003, but
C++23 will use ISO/IEC/IEEE 9945:2009 + Cor 1:2013 and Cor 2:2017 as
its normative POSIX reference.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:11, Geoff Clare wrote:
>
> Jonathan Wakely wrote, on 09 Feb 2023:
> >
> > At the ISO C++ committee meeting this week we hope to vote this change
> > into C++23:
> > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3869
> >
> > The current C++ standard (aka C++20) refers to ISO/IEC
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 14:36, Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The
Open Group wrote:
>
> Date:Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
> From:"Single UNIX Specification via austin-group-l at The Open
> Group"
> Message-ID:
16 matches
Mail list logo
