It's my understanding ISO/IEC was to bump their distribution also, to keep in
synch. Nick S. would be more conversant with the details of thay, though.
On Monday, September 28, 2020 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/09/20 14:36 +, shwaresyst wrote:
>
>The 2018 edition is the latest ISO/IEC/IEEE
On 28/09/20 14:36 +, shwaresyst wrote:
The 2018 edition is the latest ISO/IEC/IEEE version, in that it was balloted and approved
to keep the IEEE "current standard" clock from timing out. The 2008 edition
plus TCs is now the prior version, in the formal sense.
Is that not in the ISO
The 2018 edition is the latest ISO/IEC/IEEE version, in that it was balloted
and approved to keep the IEEE "current standard" clock from timing out. The
2008 edition plus TCs is now the prior version, in the formal sense.
On Thursday, September 24, 2020 Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The
On 24/09/20 08:23 -0700, Nick Stoughton wrote:
ISO/IEC 9945:2009 including Corrigenda 1 (2013) and Corrigenda 2
(2017) is the current latest approved ISO standard. The Austin Group
is in the process of revising this, with a publication date in 2022
expected. You state "Since the TCs are just
ISO/IEC 9945:2009 including Corrigenda 1 (2013) and Corrigenda 2
(2017) is the current latest approved ISO standard. The Austin Group
is in the process of revising this, with a publication date in 2022
expected. You state "Since the TCs are just lists of changes, not a
complete document, ..."
On 24/09/20 15:28 +0100, Jonathan Wakely via austin-group-l at The Open Group
wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a proposal for the ISO C++ standard committee (WG21) to
update the reference to the POSIX standard in the C++ International
Standard. My colleague Eric Blake suggested I ask on this list
Hello,
I am writing a proposal for the ISO C++ standard committee (WG21) to
update the reference to the POSIX standard in the C++ International
Standard. My colleague Eric Blake suggested I ask on this list whether
anybody here has any comments on the proposal.
The draft is at
