[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2013)/Issue7+TC1 0001044]: Calling setsid as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001208. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1044 == Reported By:daurnimator

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0001044. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

Re: Status of pipefail for standardization

Date:Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:35:39 +0100 From:Geoff Clare Message-ID: <20180907083539.GA5774@lt2.masqnet> | Since kre reported in bugnote 4102 that he added pipefail to the | NetBSD sh and it does not support arrays, it seems we have our | answer on that one. I am

Re: Status of pipefail for standardization

Drew DeVault wrote, on 05 Sep 2018: > > On 2018-09-05 8:18 AM, Drew DeVault wrote: > > Copying David on the thread. David, do you have some time to look over > > this proposal for the POSIX shell? > > My email to David bounced and I don't have a better address for him. > Does anyone else have a

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001130]: Address 0 does not make sense for the c command

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1130 == Reported By:Antonio Diaz Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

The following issue has been UPDATED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001208]: calling chdir as part of posix_spawn

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 == Reported By:eblake Assigned To:

Re: [RFC/PATCH glibc 0/2] setting working dir in posix_spawn()

[reviving a REALLY old thread] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2010-08/msg00107.html On 08/27/2010 01:35 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: (pruned cc's, +cc:libc-alpha) Eric Blake wrote: On 08/26/2010 12:18 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Do you think there would be any interest in a