Hi,
There used to be a bug in autoconf 2.13 related to the generation
of dependencies using the C/C++ compiler. This bug is still there in
autoconf 2.49a.
I am using the example project below:
http://www.murrayc.com/learning/linux/automake/helloworld_cc-0.2.tar.gz
The Sun WorkShop C/C++
On Sep 12, 2000, Dimitri PAPADOPOULOS-ORFANOS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There used to be a bug in autoconf 2.13 related to the generation
of dependencies using the C/C++ compiler. This bug is still there in
autoconf 2.49a.
autoconf has nothing to do with this. It is automake that introduces
Hi,
I see there was a suggestion to change the extension for C++
sourcecode files a couple of months ago. Someone had tested the .cxx
extension and found it to work with all compilers he could lay his
hands on (quite a few on UNIX systems, plus at least MSVisualC++ on
MSWindows).
So, as the
On Sep 12, 2000, Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively (sorry for insisting but your proposal seems a bit too
``specific'' to get into Autoconf per se), can't you just run
Configure with
AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS(my/autoconfed/dir1 my/autoconfed/dir2)
I just committed this:
Index: ChangeLog
from Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* autoupdate.sh (sed): Look for GNU sed.
(usage): Ask for GNU sed.
Index: autoupdate.sh
===
RCS file: /cvs/autoconf/autoupdate.sh,v
-Original Message-
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:11 PM
To: Bernard Dautrevaux
Cc: Autoconf mailing list (Adresse de messagerie)
Subject: Re: Autoupdate test failing on Solaris7
"Bernard" == Bernard Dautrevaux
[EMAIL
Hi!
--[Akim Demaille]--[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"diger" == diger Kuhlmann R writes:
Well... I don't have to tell you what I think about "Gnus"...
Still, why don't you want both Configure and configure in the same
dir? Are you using a case insensitive FS?
AmigaOS filesystems are traditionally
FYI on portability issue.
Cheers,
Earnie.
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
Hi!
"Dr. Volker Zell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Corinna" == Corinna
-Original Message-
From: Akim Demaille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 2:49 PM
To: Bernard Dautrevaux
Cc: Autoconf mailing list (Adresse de messagerie)
Subject: FYI: autoupdate-gnu-sed [Was: Autoupdate test failing on
Solaris7]
I just committed
"Bernard" == Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bernard Fine for me, although I wonder why you insist at eliminating
Bernard the "-e" sed options when there is only one sed command; I
Bernard know in this case thay may be omitted, but I usually keep
Bernard them for consistency with
"Akim" == Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Akim Alternatively (sorry for insisting but your proposal seems a bit
Akim too ``specific'' to get into Autoconf per se), can't you just
Akim run Configure with
Akim AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS(my/autoconfed/dir1 my/autoconfed/dir2)
Akim
Hello, Morten!
So, as the current extension (.cc) _really_ confuses MSVisualC++, it'd
be nice if the patch below is applied before releasing v2.50.
I remember hearing about the problem that M$VC and some Macintosh C++
compiler don't support _any_ common C++ extention by default.
Indeed,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I believe it would be more constructive to make M$VC accept .cc extention
is some non-interactive way. Anybody knows how?
$(CP) foo.cc foo.cpp
$(CC) foo.cpp
?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work
Hello!
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Mike Castle wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I believe it would be more constructive to make M$VC accept .cc extention
is some non-interactive way. Anybody knows how?
$(CP) foo.cc foo.cpp
$(CC) foo.cpp
This should be the
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:32:07AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Sep 11, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't actually see the point of making AC_PROG_LIBTOOL require
_AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, so I figured I must be missing something...
The point is to avoid duplicate
Yes, thank you, I know this. This is what I do. But pardon me, this
is by no means something I consider ``natural''.
I said this is the natural way to "follow the spec". Whether it seems
entirely natural as a way to do the job is not the question.
We are not going to change the
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CC=sun4-cc ./configure
Hence, next time configure is run, it forgets about the CC which was
used to build config.cache, and you get an inconsistent system.
So configure needs the user to tell things instead of doing stuff in
17 matches
Mail list logo