"Assar" == Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Assar Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you please try to run the test suite on this host? I find it
most unpleasant that this problem was not caught before. We will
fix this problem, sure, but first, I want to make sure
"Lars" == Lars J Aas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars If you invoke AC_LANG(C++) above AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, you will find
Lars that $ac_ext is "c" after AC_PROG_LIBTOOL has been run, and
Lars invoking AC_LANG(C++) again will not dispatch the necessary
Lars shell code to fix this again since AC_LANG
$ eval 'echo toto /tmp/stdout 2/tmp/stderr'
$ cat /tmp/stdout
toto
$ cat /tmp/stderr
$
$ eval 'echo toto /tmp/stdout 2/tmp/stderr' /tmp/outter
illegal io
$
Thanks Harlan!
$ eval 'echo toto /tmp/stdout 2/tmp/stderr' /tmp/outter
illegal io
$
Could you try this?
eval '(echo toto /tmp/stdout 2/tmp/stderr)' /tmp/outter
I plan to move the Autoconf package to Automake 1.4a. Any problem
with that? I'll also provide patches to adjust Automake to
configure.ac, and likewise for Libtool.
I plan to move the Autoconf package to Automake 1.4a. Any problem
with that? I'll also provide patches to adjust Automake to
configure.ac, and likewise for Libtool.
Why not Automake 1.4b?
ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/automake/automake-1.4b.tar.gz
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I plan to move the Autoconf package to Automake 1.4a. Any problem
with that? I'll also provide patches to adjust Automake to
configure.ac, and likewise for Libtool.
Pavel Why not Automake 1.4b?
Pavel
Akim Demaille wrote:
"Pavel" == Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I plan to move the Autoconf package to Automake 1.4a. Any problem
with that? I'll also provide patches to adjust Automake to
configure.ac, and likewise for Libtool.
Pavel Why not Automake 1.4b?
Pavel
Hello, Earnie!
IMO, it would be undesirable to have autoconf use a version of automake
that isn't a released version. When I was learning automake, autoconf,
etc. I went about it by actually using the tools on themselves. Not
having a released version of automake would have been a
Akim Demaille wrote:
"Earnie" == Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Earnie IMO, it would be undesirable to have autoconf use a version of
Earnie automake that isn't a released version.
It seems to me that there is still a chance to have an Automake
release soon.
That would be
Pavel Roskin wrote:
Hello, Earnie!
IMO, it would be undesirable to have autoconf use a version of automake
that isn't a released version. When I was learning automake, autoconf,
etc. I went about it by actually using the tools on themselves. Not
having a released version of
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:37:01AM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
: I am trying to use autoconf on Windows with the
: MKS Toolkit, which consists of a Korn shell and
: the usual Unix utilities.
Woopie doo, yet another Windows environment :)
[...]
: Now the fun part. AC_PROG_CC fails for me for
:
Earnie IMO, it would be undesirable to have autoconf use a version of
Earnie automake that isn't a released version.
Akim It seems to me that there is still a chance to have an Automake
Akim release soon.
That would be nice.
We could also do another automake beta release after the features
I think it is important that automake-using distributions use an
actual release and not the cvs automake.
I think that some of the free Unix/Linux distros use their own
patched version of automake which in turn is based on cvs automake
at some more or less random point in time. For my own
I guess you are slightly confused.
No, I'm not.
That's great :-)
egcs-update!? What's that?
Script developed by GCC developers in the EGCS days to simplify life for
those CVS users who didn't have the full list of up-to-date maintainer
tools. Now available by running
cvs -d
...just a short question - is there possibly a configure GUI
somewhere? Something that parses "configure --help", shows a
nice GUI to change the options, and offers ability to run
configure $options, make and make install. No, I don't mean
something that can do anything about configure-options,
"Lars J. Aas" wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:37:01AM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
: I am trying to use autoconf on Windows with the
: MKS Toolkit, which consists of a Korn shell and
: the usual Unix utilities.
Woopie doo, yet another Windows environment :)
Well, isn't this exactly
"Lars" == Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars I think that some of the free Unix/Linux distros use their own
Lars patched version of automake which in turn is based on cvs automake
Lars at some more or less random point in time.
Yeah. Red Hat did that. Maybe other distributions
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:25:50PM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
"Lars J. Aas" wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 10:37:01AM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
: I am trying to use autoconf on Windows with the
: MKS Toolkit, which consists of a Korn shell and
: the usual Unix utilities.
19 matches
Mail list logo
