Re: autoconf-2.59b fails to include correct X11R6 paths in configure scripts on AMD64 systems

2005-09-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
scripts on AMD64 systems running GNU/Linux. Thanks for reporting this. I have installed the XMKMF patch suggested by Pavel Roskin in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2005-08/msg00078.html. Does this fix the problem? (Sorry, I'm not an expert on these systems yet, so I have

Re: autoconf-2.59b fails to include correct X11R6 paths in configure scripts on AMD64 systems

2005-09-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
in configure scripts on AMD64 systems running GNU/Linux. Thanks for reporting this. I have installed the XMKMF patch suggested by Pavel Roskin in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2005-08/msg00078.html. Does this fix the problem? (Sorry, I'm not an expert on these systems yet, so I

Re: Check XMKMF variable, export CC for xmkmf

2005-08-31 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 12:42 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * lib/autoconf/libs.m4 (_AC_PATH_X_XMKMF): Use shell variable XMKMF to locate xmkmf. Make XMKMF precious. Export CC when running xmkmf. Thanks; I installed that. Perhaps it needs

What is going on with releases, mailing lists?

2003-11-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
list. It appears that the traffic is not very heavy. Besides, I have a Spamcop subscription, so I can reroute spam to my account and report it. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: What is going on with releases, mailing lists?

2003-11-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: What is going on with releases, mailing lists?

2003-11-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Paul == Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've seen an announcement in [EMAIL PROTECTED] that Automake 1.7.9 has been released with Autoconf 2.59 OK, I give up. I used

Re: Autoconf 2.56 is released

2002-11-18 Thread Pavel Roskin
was extremely tolerant to incorrect macro invocations, but waiting longer endangers the portability of your package and only delays the conversation to newer Autoconf versions. You probably mean conversion, not conversation :-) -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Libtool 1.4.3

2002-10-08 Thread Pavel Roskin
, if I understand correctly), then it's absolutely reasonable to require the developer to spend some time and make sure that the configure script provides the same level of compatibility. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: how to tell user you need autoconf2.50?

2002-03-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hi, Dan! On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Dan Kegel wrote: Dumb question: what do I put in configure.in to make sure nobody accidentally uses autoconf2.13 on it? I think there's a way to specify minimum version of autoconf required, but I'm too dumb to find it... AC_PREREQ(2.50) -- Regards, Pavel

Troubles with PACKAGE_TARNAME

2002-01-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
macros more that the ones from Autoconf. Maybe the GNU Coding Standards have changed so that spaces are not allowed in the project names? But how about non-GNU projects using Autoconf and Automake? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: bison-1.29c 'configure' problems on Solaris 8.

2001-10-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
(i.e., Autotest scripts, M4sh-AdHoC scripts and so on). Fine with me as long as the testsuite doesn't break. I understand that it doesn't. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: configure busybox

2001-09-20 Thread Pavel Roskin
was using some mix of Autoconf and Linux-style manual configuration. The homepage of GGI is http://www.ggi-project.org/ -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Autoconf 2.50 - 2.13 problems

2001-08-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
-2.52. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: m4_warn test fails, removing autom4te.cache helps

2001-08-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
) and play with it when you want to, not when the testsuite fails. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

m4_warn test fails, removing autom4te.cache helps

2001-08-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
$ autoconf configure.ac:3: warning: syntax $ autoconf $ rm -rf autom4te.cache $ autoconf configure.ac:3: warning: syntax $ Removing autom4te.cache between autoconf invocations fixes the test, but I believe that the actual problem is in autoconf, not in the test. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Autconf and Alpha architecture

2001-07-26 Thread Pavel Roskin
That would be a very serious bug in Autoconf, but I don't see _POSIX_V6_LP64_OFF64 anywhere in the Autoconf sources. Could you please find out where _POSIX_V6_LP64_OFF64 comes from and how it is used? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: GAFCOM CONCERNS

2001-07-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
combination of rules if you don't want to filter out personal e-mails, only the list, :0: * ^Subject: *\(antigen|scanmail)\ * ^List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null :0 H B: * ^Content-Type: application/mixed * ^List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/null -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: GAFCOM CONCERNS

2001-07-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
. Try persuading [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I already tried it without success. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

F77_DUMMY_MAIN (Was: Release 2.51 now?)

2001-07-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
to be the reason why it is used so often. I'm not aware of any other problems with the CVS version of Autoconf that could prevent releasing the next stable version. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Testsuite fails on AC_SYS_RESTARTABLE_SYSCALLS

2001-06-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
I'm missing something obvious or the current scheme with AU_DEFUN should be reworked. Akim? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Dropping CPP for AC_CHECK tests? (Was: CPP determined incorrectly)

2001-06-14 Thread Pavel Roskin
dependencies. We cannot switch from preprocessing to compilation without seriously breaking backward compatibility. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: CPP determined incorrectly

2001-06-14 Thread Pavel Roskin
question. I personally don't want to risk, but if you think that you can make Automake work with the big macro (maybe by releasing another Automake-1.4-pX) without spending months on it then I'll support merging the macros now. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: CPP determined incorrectly

2001-06-13 Thread Pavel Roskin
, or AC_PROG_CPP called after AC_LANG(none). -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

config/prev-version.txt

2001-06-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
it. If you are committing or adding files from the current directory and from other directories in the same command always make sure that all the files have been processed. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: CPP determined incorrectly

2001-06-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
, but a broken cc is tolerable (eg. to process *.S - *.o) If a broken cc is tolerable then you should have a mechanism to instruct configure not to abort. This is quite orthogonal to the preprocessor test. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: CPP determined incorrectly

2001-06-11 Thread Pavel Roskin
earlier or later anyways. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: TODO

2001-06-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
the remaining bugs by hand? -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: autoconf 2.50 tests and cache

2001-05-31 Thread Pavel Roskin
something like set | sort environment.TEST_NUMBER Maybe the solution is in between: adding a new test which runs all the macros, and preserve the cache. Test for working cache is important, but running all macros would be an overkill in my opinion. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

CPP determined incorrectly

2001-05-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
?) hackerish approach. Since Autoconf-2.50 has been released, it would be fair to drop support for Autoconf-2.13 and use new facilities for attaching dependency code to AC_PROG_CC (provided that they exist and I understand the problem correctly). -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Warning on OpenBSD 2.7

2001-05-22 Thread Pavel Roskin
Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001?

2001-05-21 Thread Pavel Roskin
you and everybody on this list! -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: make check error on OpenBSD 2.8

2001-04-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
PROTECTED] -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

AC_PACKAGE_VERSION left unexpanded

2001-04-16 Thread Pavel Roskin
, or `m4_ifset', as in _AC_INIT_CONFIG_LOG -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Autoconf make problems

2001-03-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
existed it wouldn't be fixed in 2 years?! Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: UnixWare-7.1.1 failure of autoconf-2.49c selftest

2001-03-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
ss for you now. I hope you don't object that I'm moving the discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is an important issue and it's not the first time that we have problems with Autoconf not supplying full path when it's needed. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: FYI: Ultrix autotest/autoconf problem fix

2001-03-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
-stder1 It has been fixed since then, but that was a message on [EMAIL PROTECTED] that the above warning still appears on Tru64 v5.1. Please test CVS Autoconf on your system and try to understand what's happenning if the problem persists. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Akim! * tests/atgeneral.m4 (AT_INIT): Register at-setup-line and at-check-line for removal. Check for the presence of at-check-line only when $at_test was really a test. Reported by Pavel. Thanks! Go ahead. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
I've done some search in CVS history. The problem was introduced by the following change (committed 2000/11/23 09:47:45) Did you do this by hand? Shame on me, it wasn't a full-blown script. I used to have an iterator for CVS, but I lost it since then. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
ck is useless to find problems in the tests other than the first one, since a failure to create at-check-line would be masked by the old at-check-line left from another test. This test is also useless after banner-* tests. Actually, it's where it's failing - in banner-1 and banner-2. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Weird testsuite problems

2001-03-03 Thread Pavel Roskin
looking one) nor the hang with pdksh/zsh are fixed by it. As a final note, the file BUGS should not say "Do not use." in the release. Just a reminder, don't take it as offence :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Autoconf testing results.

2001-02-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
t.]) fi I haven't yet figured out why AC_MSG_ERROR doesn't work as expected at this point. Important questions: 1) Do we want it to be in AS_SHELL_SANITIZE? 2) Should we check the other bugs, such as string size limit? Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Are we ready for 2.49d?

2001-02-26 Thread Pavel Roskin
, ash-0.2, ash-0.3.x, pdksh and zsh), at least on some *BSD and maybe on Cygwin (but I trashed BIOS on my Windows machine, so don't expect the later from me). I'll report the results of my testing tonight. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Autoconf testing results.

2001-02-26 Thread Pavel Roskin
The issues with ash-0.2 can be worked around by creating temporary files, but I doubt whether we should do it. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition

2001-02-24 Thread Pavel Roskin
in Autoconf. User-supplied macros are not affected either since they don't use conf$$. Feel free to use conf$$. Regards, Pavel Roskin

CVS Autoconf broken - no acceptable cc found

2001-02-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
n:/sbin/cc + continue + ac_ct_CC= + test -n + echo configure:1095: result: no + echo no The only change since yesterday was: 2001-02-23 Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] * acgeneral.m4 (_AC_INIT_PREPARE_FS_SEPARATORS): Fix typo: s/;/:/ Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition

2001-02-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fnord" LIBS="$LIBS -lol" $CC $CFLAGS $LIBS -o conf$$ conf$$.c ./conf$$ conf$$.val rm -f conf$$ conf$$.c ) ac_result=`cat conf$$.val` rm -f conf$$.val Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] config.status exit status on Ultra 10 w/Solaris 8

2001-02-20 Thread Pavel Roskin
for "after 2.50". 2001-02-20 Lars J. Aas [EMAIL PROTECTED] * acgeneral.m4 (_AC_OUTPUT_CONFIG_STATUS): use `AS_EXIT(0)' instead of `exit 0' when exiting config.status. Start entries with upper case - Use ... Everything else is Ok. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Proposal for AC_PROG_PERL

2001-02-19 Thread Pavel Roskin
This is for 2.51 or more. We do have a problem with AC_CHECK_PROG and relatives, that's for sure. But let's forget about this issue now. Please, install your proposals etc. in TODO, but focus on releasing Autoconf. Ok. I like this approach. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: glibc 2.2 and config.guess

2001-02-19 Thread Pavel Roskin
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be great if you could expain what exactly is happening for you. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition

2001-02-16 Thread Pavel Roskin
. If for any reason this can happen without explicit user intervention, it's a bug in Autoconf (or Automake, if it puts a wrong shell to makefiles). Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition

2001-02-16 Thread Pavel Roskin
On 16 Feb 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Feb 16, 2001, Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see. But we don't need reentrancy for configure, do we? Nope. Not even for config.status, AFAIK. We just need concurrency, not reentrancy. Unless a new requirement has entered the picture

More weird things in autoconf

2001-02-16 Thread Pavel Roskin
iple macro definitions are handled. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Warnings are broken

2001-02-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
to AT_DATA doesn't end with a newline, then _ATEOF is glued with the last line. I believe AT_DATA needs a sanity check. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Akim's on vacation again?

2001-02-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
don't want to interrupt my efforts until I succeed or give up :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

m4_unquote

2001-02-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
subst([[$1]], [^\[\[\(.*\)\]\]$], [[\1]])]) _ Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] don't discard previous config.log before necessary

2001-02-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
it somewhere. But again, this seems to be an overkill. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition

2001-02-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
, as_unset etc into config.status, In this case it's easy to support weird things when you stop supporting other weird things (I mean, reentrancy vs. different shell). But you'll have to persuade me that your weird thing is more important :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: AC_CANONICAL_*

2001-02-11 Thread Pavel Roskin
safe to remove "dnl". Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name.

2001-02-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
on for some projects in a couple of years. So it's better to be prepared. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: AM_INCLUDE is a bad name.

2001-02-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
, Pavel Roskin

GNATS needs some work

2001-01-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
whatever we can. If your are not sure, don't touch bugs, someone else will take care of them. And please don't close the bugs that you just don't want to fix. Either suspend them or leave a comment and move to "analyzed". Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59)

2001-01-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
onftest.sh is clearly better than my conftest.bat, as well as its contents :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59)

2001-01-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
/m4/whatever). Since the test is run by bash and not by something else it may be very tricky to determine the path separator unless you have perl/m4/whatever. Well, maybe if you try ";" first it should work. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: autoconf/145

2001-01-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
ncerned about one project, its development team and its area of applicability. For example, you can define a variable to "VPATH" and AC_SUBST it, you can require GNU make etc. It's all luxury that Autoconf and Automake cannot afford. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Improving autoscan: help!

2001-01-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
e Autoconf is our moral obligation before the community - years of bugfixing should crystallize to a new stable version. I'm sorry, Akim, that I have to write it, but I feel that we are doing something wrong. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Moving to Automake 1.4a

2001-01-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
I plan to move the Autoconf package to Automake 1.4a. Any problem with that? I'll also provide patches to adjust Automake to configure.ac, and likewise for Libtool. Why not Automake 1.4b? ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/automake/automake-1.4b.tar.gz Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Moving to Automake 1.4a

2001-01-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
some new features in Autoconf. It doesn't mean that every project using the latest Autoconf (CVS or otherwise) will be required to use an unreleased version of Automake. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Moving to Automake 1.4a

2001-01-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Typo in autoreconf

2000-12-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Motoyuki Kasahara wrote: Hi, I found a typo in `autoreconf.sh' ($localddir - $localdir). Fix applied. Thanks! Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: changequote

2000-12-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
developed. Is that - define - going to be dropped too, btw? Not in 2.50. And only for the sources that indicate (by AC_REQUIRE or something like that) that they want to work in the new namespace. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Make distcheck error

2000-12-17 Thread Pavel Roskin
versions of Autoconf. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: configure.ac

2000-12-17 Thread Pavel Roskin
should be treated in the same way. I withdraw my comment that asked for the opposite. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: configure.ac

2000-12-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
" ITEM NAME="tests/Makefile" REQUIRED="no" /AC_CONFIG FILES AC_OUTPUT Well, enough for today :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

RE: Expanded rules for scripts

2000-12-14 Thread Pavel Roskin
ow to write portable makefiles, so it belongs to make-stds.texi or maybe also to the Automake manual. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Config error for Darwin (Mac OS/X)

2000-12-14 Thread Pavel Roskin
PROTECTED] Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Config error for Darwin (Mac OS/X)

2000-12-13 Thread Pavel Roskin
oblems with OpenLDAP without playing with Mac OSX. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: autoconf/161

2000-12-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
or should it be fixed? I guess few simple C++ tests wouldn't hurt, as well as a test for language selection with AC_LANG. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: OpenBSD 2.7

2000-12-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
right now by hand. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: OpenBSD 2.7

2000-12-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
the version number? I already suggested it, but with your arguments I feel much better about doing so. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: OpenBSD 2.7

2000-12-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
be AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in configure.in and @MAINT@ before the explicit rule, but I believe it's an overkill. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: FYI: `Document' qnx (Was: Various systems)

2000-12-05 Thread Pavel Roskin
k. If you insist on having the Systemology section I'll try to put more relevant content there. I'm updating my .plan Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: FYI: `Document' qnx (Was: Various systems)

2000-12-01 Thread Pavel Roskin
autoconf's way to deal with static OS'es. The autoconf's way is to deal with known problems in possibly unknown combinations :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on QNX 4.2.5

2000-11-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
around those issues with QNX 4.25 somehow. How about this: ac_output=`command || echo "===ERROR==="` case $ac_output in *===ERROR===) AC_MSG_ERROR([command failed]) ;; *) ;; esac Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Problem with latest CVS autoconf

2000-11-30 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Harlan! The problem went away after I flushed my build direcory and re-ran configure. Congratulations! It's always a good idea to start from scratch. I wrongly assumed that you knew it, so it's my fault :-) Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Problem with latest CVS autoconf

2000-11-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
send us acversion.m4 and acversion.m4.in? Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on QNX 4.2.5

2000-11-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
tatus, e.g. ac_file_inputs=`IFS=: for f in $ac_file_in; do ... esac done` || { false; exit; } I'm afraid that Autoconf will have to reject QNX's shell. It's hard to work around this kind of shell braindamage :-( Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Torture tests missing /dev/null

2000-11-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
in autoupdate, but now you found a separate problem. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on QNX 4.2.5

2000-11-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
+ for loop. Anybody knows how to rewrite this: ac_output=`command`; ac_status=$? in a way that it works even on QNX but doesn't cause significant slowdown? Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Problem with latest CVS autoconf

2000-11-28 Thread Pavel Roskin
The same. If it's too big send the last 50 lines. Also please attach config.log Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Generated options for autoconf...

2000-11-13 Thread Pavel Roskin
that builds all that stuff automatically, without requiring your intervention when new options are added. Your message remains in the archives and will be used some day. Thank you for your efforts. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Generated options for autoconf...

2000-11-13 Thread Pavel Roskin
ffort. You're welcome. - Bruce I meant you, Bruce. But my point was - we should have templates in CVS and everything should be regenerated from them automatically whenever anybody of us changes the template. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: 01-ac-lang-compiler-require.patch (Was: CC/CPP/TRY_LINK)

2000-11-10 Thread Pavel Roskin
ntheses. I don't like either of them. 2) "exit 77" is used in other testsuites, not only in Autoconf. This is probably not a very strong argument, but why should Autoconf decide what other testsuites should ignore? Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: ac_cv_prog_gcc

2000-11-08 Thread Pavel Roskin
ith 0 arguments don't have parentheses, so it shouldn't be a problem. I'll have a look whether it's possible to implement AU_ALIAS in such way. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: 01-ac-lang-compiler-require.patch (Was: CC/CPP/TRY_LINK)

2000-11-08 Thread Pavel Roskin
an attempt to accomodate the testsuite at the expence of the users. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Forbidden strings

2000-11-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
r package should be the right way. I.e., AC for autoconf, AM for automake, LT for libtool. It should be easy to rename A[HSTU]_* to something else before 2.50. It will be harder to do it later. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: AC_LANG_SOURCE(C++) and exit

2000-11-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
++ background who could rewrite AC_LANG_SOURCE(C++) and test it on many compilers. I hope that you will find time to create a well tested patch and submit it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: ac_cv_prog_gcc

2000-11-07 Thread Pavel Roskin
appears to be in the definition of AU_DEFUN. It adds parentheses unconditionally. Maybe we need another AU_DEFUN, without parentheses? Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: autoconf option fun

2000-11-06 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Ralf! # autoconf --add-missing autoconf: option `--add-missing' requires an argument It's my bug. I'll fix it. Thank you for the report. Regards, Pavel Roskin

OpenBSD 2.7

2000-11-03 Thread Pavel Roskin
mv $@.tmp $@ I did use "make dist" to create the tarball - it doesn't help. Regards, Pavel Roskin

Re: Forbidden strings

2000-11-03 Thread Pavel Roskin
: undefined macro: lt_AR_FLAGS configure:5870: error: undefined macro: AR_FLAGS What should we do? Return to A[CHMSTU] Regards, Pavel Roskin

  1   2   >