>> ac_c_check_func() {
>> if test $ac_cv...; then
>> ...
>> else
>> ac_c_link_ifelse() {
>> }
>> fi
>> }
>>
>> which does not work of course.
>
> For me mere mortal, who doesn't wade in the problems you've studied in
> detail, what exactly is problematic here?
S
Hi Paolo,
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 06:20:53PM CEST:
> Hi, I know I should be writing testcases for AS_ME_PREPARE. :-) But
> while I was looking at adding shell functions to Autoconf proper, I
> decided that the current basic implementation of AS_REQUIRE is not
> scalable.
>
>
Hi, I know I should be writing testcases for AS_ME_PREPARE. :-) But
while I was looking at adding shell functions to Autoconf proper, I
decided that the current basic implementation of AS_REQUIRE is not
scalable.
In particular, AC_CHECK_FUNC will need its own shell function, plus
the one for AC_LI
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> How about also adding tests for them?
>
> Okay, I will.
This should be enough for AS_LINENO_PREPARE:
2008-10-12 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/m4sh.at: Use documented AS_LINENO_PREPARE.
diff --git a/tests/m4sh.at b/tests/m4sh.at
index d8542ed..854b4
> How about also adding tests for them?
Okay, I will.
> In fact, I think this is a good first approximation (note embedded TAB):
>
> git diff HEAD ChangeLog |
> sed -n '/^+$/,$s/^+ //p' |
> sed '1a\
> '
Aha, I see. I'm currently using my own script for that as a
prepare-commit-msg hook, I'll
Hi,
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
> >
> > This patch documents $as_me and $LINENO, which are the sole constructs
> > (for now) that explicitly require a *_PREPARE macro because they are
> > variables. So those are defined without the hyphen and documented.
How about also adding tests for them?
Anyth
Hi William,
* William Pursell wrote on Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 08:57:50AM CEST:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> Furthermore, your patch still has some portability problems. For example,
>> ... you cannot rely on the existence of mktemp.
>
> I don't want to consume a lot of your time answering ignorant
> q
