configure complaint from a SGI O3k machine

Just a note to say that when I configure on a 1024-processor SGI 3k Origin I get a strange error during the test for a GNU ld: % ./configure --prefix=/u/kleb/local creating cache ./config.cache checking host system type... mips-sgi-irix6.5_nwokah_1218022002_SN1XXL checking target system type...

dynamic autotest testsuite options

I'm trying to convert the CVS test suite to use autotest rather than its current homeroll and I was hoping to carry over some of the options that the homeroll accepts into the new testsuite. Is there some way other than converting them into VAR=XXX type options to have testsuite accept them? S

Re: Auto(conf|make) style questions

>>> "tomas" == tomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> NEON_COMPAT="$NEON_COMPAT scm_c_string2str.lo" tomas> EEEK! ;-) [...] tomas> If I understand the configury documentation correctly -- isn't using tomas> explicit dynamic object ending

WARNING: gsl/gsl_sf_bessel.h: accepted by the compiler

I keep getting this message if I use Sun's compiler (cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3 2001/05/15) on my Sun Ultra 80 with Solaris 9. I've set the environment variable CC to cc. If the CC variable is not set, then gcc is found and the bug does not appear. It might be a problem with my coding of con

Re: WARNING: gsl/gsl_sf_bessel.h: accepted by the compiler

I should have stated I'm using autoconf 2.57 "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > > I keep getting this message if I use Sun's compiler (cc: Sun WorkShop > 6 update 2 C 5.3 2001/05/15) on my Sun Ultra 80 with Solaris 9. I've > set the environment variable CC to cc. If the CC variable is not set, > then gc

Re: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!

"Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not quite sure how a header file can be usable, but not present!! The next version of Autoconf will have some documentation about this. Here's the current draft, written by Akim Demaille, in Texinfo format: @node Present But Cannot Be Compil

Re: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!

On Friday, 21 March 2003 at 14:21, Paul Eggert wrote: I've noted some typos in case you want to fix them. > The next version of Autoconf will have some documentation about this. > Here's the current draft, written by Akim Demaille, in Texinfo format: > > > > @node Present But Cannot Be Compile

Re: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:21:21PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm not quite sure how a header file can be usable, but not present!! > > The next version of Autoconf will have some documentation about this. > Here's the current draft, written b