Hi Jeff.
On Sunday 07 November 2010, Jeff Hammond wrote:
I suck for taking so long to respond, but I attempted to verify my
error and cannot, meaning that after a variety of updates and a new
pass at building automake-1.11, everything is fine, i.e. all the make
check tests are passing.
Den 2010-11-15 01:39 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Running MSVC on osfX.Y is not interesting. I'd write a patch to skip
the test
Yeah, I agree this is the best option.
but I can't then test the result.
Me neither (I don't have access to a True64/OSF
Den 2010-11-15 09:19 skrev Peter Rosin:
diff --git a/tests/defs b/tests/defs
index 82c3b5b..e37bb96 100644
--- a/tests/defs
+++ b/tests/defs
@@ -290,6 +290,15 @@ do
echo $me: running texi2dvi -o /dev/null --version
( texi2dvi -o /dev/null --version ) || exit 77
;;
+
Den 2010-11-15 10:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
Hi!
I found this little gem in compile while reading the code. Pushed as
obvious to the msvc branch.
Obviously I tripped up while committing something obvious. Sorry for
being sloppy. So, I also pushed this follow-up commit to the msvc branch:
On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-11-15 09:19 skrev Peter Rosin:
diff --git a/tests/defs b/tests/defs
index 82c3b5b..e37bb96 100644
--- a/tests/defs
+++ b/tests/defs
@@ -290,6 +290,15 @@ do
echo $me: running texi2dvi -o /dev/null --version
(
On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-11-15 10:40 skrev Peter Rosin:
Den 2010-11-15 10:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
Hi!
I found this little gem in compile while reading the code. Pushed as
obvious to the msvc branch.
Obviously I tripped up while committing something
Den 2010-11-15 11:44 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
Should I fixup the ChangeLog entry?
I'd say just to merge the update scriptversion message with the
previous entry in the ChangeLog, like this:
+2010-11-15 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
+
+ compile: clear the `eat' variable earlier.
On Monday 15 November 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-11-15 11:44 skrev Stefano Lattarini:
Should I fixup the ChangeLog entry?
I'd say just to merge the update scriptversion message with the
previous entry in the ChangeLog, like this:
+2010-11-15 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
+
On Monday 15 November 2010, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
I'm seeing this failure in test yaccdry.test at the Hydra continuous
build system for automake:
[CUT]
OK to apply the attached patch to a temporary bugfix branch to be
then merged into maint?
Please disregard this message. The bug has
On 11/14/2010 10:24 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
tests: work around dash quoting issue in case statements.
* tests/color.test, tests/color2.test: Quote variable in case
pattern, to avoid skipping tests with dash 0.5.5.1.
diff --git a/tests/color.test b/tests/color.test
index
* tests/defs: In the loop on $required tools: avoid subshells
where not neded.
---
ChangeLog |4
tests/defs | 30 +++---
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
From ccf42890cb5a5cc89e62593987f9a1b7c3895480 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano
* tests/defs.in: In the loop on $required tools, for gcc
and g++, also run gcc -v (resp. g++ -v), to get more
information, and for consistency with gcj.
---
ChangeLog |5 +
tests/defs |4
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
From
* tests/defs: Exit with status 99 (hard error) rather than
1 (failure) on unexpected/internal errors, or when a signal
is caught by the client script.
Some minor changes in spacing and formatting.
($extra_includes): Variable renamed to ...
($acincludes): ... this one, and extended.
---
ChangeLog
Tests defs: new subroutine `skip' for test skipping.
* tests/defs.in (skip): New subroutine, causing the running
test script to be SKIP'd, possibly with a meaningful message.
Use it throughout.
* tests/REAMDE: Updated.
* tests/color.test: Use the new `skip' subroutine.
* tests/color2.test:
* tests/defs ($priv_check_temp, $overwrite_status, $ro_dir_temp,
$create_status, $r2h, $libtool_found, $gettext_found, $aclocaldir,
$extra_includes): Unset once they've served their purpose.
---
ChangeLog |7 +++
tests/defs |5 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Stefano Lattarini (5):
Tests defs: don't let useless variables leak in test scripts.
Tests defs: new subroutine `skip' for test skipping.
Tests defs: some cleanup and minor fixes.
Tests defs: avoid some useless subshells.
Tests required tools: also try `-v' option for GNU compilers.
No
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:14:54PM CET:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-20101114190221478.txt
+ /bin/grep -F -v @SET_MAKE@ Makefile.in
+ 1 Makefile.sed
+ make -f Makefile.sed SHELL=/bin/sh test1
echo ' @top_srcdir@/configure.in
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET:
This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init)
but the backport to the msvc branch is trivial. I stole the xsi-test
from libtool.
Would be good if someone tested on that Alpha before pushing I
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:00:16PM CET:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-201011141902490189000.txt
FAIL: backcompat5.test (exit: 1)
[CUT]
find ../foo-1.0 -print ## useful for debugging
find: missing conjunction
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:14:54PM CET:
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/automake/log-20101114190221478.txt
+ /bin/grep -F -v @SET_MAKE@ Makefile.in
+ 1 Makefile.sed
+ make -f Makefile.sed SHELL=/bin/sh
On Monday 15 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:37:13AM CET:
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:59:22AM CEST:
But since we are at it, we can do better, extending
Den 2010-11-15 23:23 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:19:44AM CET:
This is based off of master (but I guess it also applies to tests-init)
but the backport to the msvc branch is trivial. I stole the xsi-test
from libtool.
Would be good if
Hello list,
I have some functions written in C that take a floating point argument, e.g.
void foos (float x);
void food (double x);
The function bodies are basically identical except of course for the
different floating point types. In order to avoid having to write
redundant code, I see 2
On 2010-11-15 09:11 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote:
Hello list,
I have some functions written in C that take a floating point argument, e.g.
void foos (float x);
void food (double x);
The function bodies are basically identical except of course for the
different floating point types. In
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Nicolas Bock nicolasb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some functions written in C that take a floating point argument, e.g.
void foos (float x);
void food (double x);
The function bodies are basically identical except of course for the
different floating point
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Bock wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:11:26PM CET:
(1) I can use C++ and rewrite the function header as a template.
(2) I can define a macro for the preprocessor that is either defined
as float or double and then compile the function source twice, the
first time with $CC
Thanks all for the suggestions. I will give it a try...
nick
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 14:08, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Bock wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:11:26PM CET:
(1) I can use C++ and rewrite the function header as a template.
(2) I can
27 matches
Mail list logo
