On 12/07/10 01:54, Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
as well as listing in the rationale examples such as $($(@)_FLAGS) and
$(V$O) that are unspecified.
$($...@_flags) is a very useful, as it allows target-specific
flags.
For all targets whose name conforms to make macro name requirements.
It would
* Bruce Korb wrote on Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:36:16PM CET:
On 12/07/10 01:54, Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
$($...@_flags) is a very useful, as it allows target-specific
flags.
For all targets whose name conforms to make macro name requirements.
Right. But since period is allowed, only hyphen
Meanwhile, this may work as an appropriate wording that still
permits IRIX behavior, by stating that recursive expansion is
only specified for parenthesized variables that are not one
of the five internal macros (@, %, ?, , *), and only when
nested with () or {}:
Change line 95800:
[adding the Austin Group; this is in regards to
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=336, and this email implies that
we may want to tweak the wording and restart the 30-day interpretation
window if it is important to not invalidate existing IRIX behavior]
On 12/05/2010 08:50 PM, Ralf
I may have missed this in the earlier discussions, but, what should
make report/return if it encounters an infinitely recursive
variable? How deep should make be required to expand before it
speculates that further expansion will result in infinite recursion?
Vbad = $(V$(X11))
X11 = $(Vbad)
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:21:13PM CET:
On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'm not sure if it was mentioned before in the discussion, but
portability-wise, there is a difference between one level of recursion
and arbitrary many. IIRC then IRIX make
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 04:50:05AM CET:
IRIX 6.5 make fails over each expansion in output lines 5, 6, and 7,
That should have been '4, 5, and 6'. Sorry.
e.g.:
v1, v1, v
v1, v11, v
R
UX:make: ERROR: Unmatched closing curly braces or parenthesis in line
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 06:14:28PM CET:
Good news! Today's Austin Group meeting included a review of
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=336, which is proposing that
$(var$(V)) as a way of choosing between $(var0) and $(var1) based on the
contents of $(V) be
On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'm not sure if it was mentioned before in the discussion, but
portability-wise, there is a difference between one level of recursion
and arbitrary many. IIRC then IRIX make only supported one level, i.e.,
$(var1$(var2$(var3)))
was
