[off-list]
Reviving an oldish thread...
Reference:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-11/msg2.html
On Monday 01 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Valentin David wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:41:47PM CET:
I hope I will be able to prepare the new patches
Hello Pippijn.
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Pippijn van wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path
(branch coverage) for new code. I understand that only Stefano is
able to produce this in
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:36:16PM CET:
But it's not like I have a silver bullet to write proper tests
which attain complete branch coverage; I just proceed by common
sense, trying to maximize such coverage. That's all, sadly.
A while ago I posted instructions on how
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:36:16PM CET:
But it's not like I have a silver bullet to write proper tests
which attain complete branch coverage; I just proceed by common
sense, trying to maximize such coverage.
Hello Pippijn.
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Pippijn van wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path
(branch coverage) for new code. I understand that only Stefano is
able to produce this in
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:36:16PM CET:
But it's not like I have a silver bullet to write proper tests
which attain complete branch coverage; I just proceed by common
sense, trying to maximize such coverage. That's all, sadly.
A while ago I posted instructions on how
On Sunday 14 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 01:36:16PM CET:
But it's not like I have a silver bullet to write proper tests
which attain complete branch coverage; I just proceed by common
sense, trying to maximize such coverage.
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path
(branch coverage) for new code. I understand that only Stefano is
able to produce this in reasonable amount of time, so whatever you guys
can manage is better
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ideally, I would like to see testsuite coverage for each code path
(branch coverage) for new code. I understand that only Stefano is
able to produce this in reasonable amount of time, so whatever you guys
can manage is better
Hi Valentin,
let's move to the -patches list. And sorry for the long delay.
* Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST:
I propose a patch as attached.
* The lang_*_rewrite are added to the Language structure. The default
is lang_sub_obj. They do not return anymore the
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
* Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST:
* --libdir= can be called several times, the arguments can also have a
list of paths separated by a colon. Empty paths correspond to the
original
* Valentin David wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:41:47PM CET:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Also, I like the approach of calling the whole feature experimental and
at the same time asking users to tell us which features from automake.in
they need so we can document
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:13:00PM +0200, Valentin David wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de
wrote:
I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that
the assignment papers are done (thanks!).
It is done.
Does this mean the feature
Hi Valentin,
let's move to the -patches list. And sorry for the long delay.
* Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST:
I propose a patch as attached.
* The lang_*_rewrite are added to the Language structure. The default
is lang_sub_obj. They do not return anymore the
* Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 12:43:57PM CET:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:13:00PM +0200, Valentin David wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that
the assignment papers are done
On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Valentin David wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Valentin. Thank you very much for your patch implementing this
much-desired automake feature. Here is a preliminary review...
On Friday 03
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Valentin. Thank you very much for your patch implementing this
much-desired automake feature. Here is a preliminary review...
On Friday 03 September 2010, Valentin David wrote:
* The lang_*_rewrite
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that
the assignment papers are done (thanks!).
It is done.
--
Valentin David
valentin.da...@gmail.com
Hi Valentin. Thank you very much for your patch implementing this
much-desired automake feature. Here is a preliminary review...
On Friday 03 September 2010, Valentin David wrote:
Dear Automake list,
I work with programming languages. It is very common to write small
compilers, parser
Hello Stefano, Valentin,
please discuss patches on the -patches list; and please keep the
original poster in Cc:, thanks.
I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that
the assignment papers are done (thanks!).
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 04:05:02PM CEST:
On Saturday 23 October 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Stefano, Valentin,
please discuss patches on the -patches list; and please keep the
original poster in Cc:, thanks.
I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that
the assignment papers are done (thanks!).
*
Hello Valentin,
* Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST:
I am waiting for your comments.
well, I very much like the ideas in your mail. I didn't look at the
patch yet, because you don't yet have copyright papers in place.
Details off-list.
Thanks,
Ralf
Op 3 sep 2010, om 18:56 heeft Valentin David het volgende geschreven:
I propose a patch as attached.
You rule. thank you so much for this. :)
-- k
23 matches
Mail list logo
