RW == Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
RW And your observation seems another hint to that end.
RW I think this is what we should do. OK to apply?
OK. (And I see THANKS was updated here, so disregard my note in
another response.)
Thanks
RW 2006-10-14 Ralf Wildenhues
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 00:05 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:48:12AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 16:15 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:48:12AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 16:15 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-traildatabase=automakepr=492
We
[Cced to automake@gnu.org and bug-automake@gnu.org for further
discussion. Which list is appropriate here?]
Hello!
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-traildatabase=automakepr=492
It's been some time,
[Cced to automake@gnu.org and bug-automake@gnu.org for further
discussion. Which list is appropriate here?]
Hello!
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-traildatabase=automakepr=492
It's been some time,
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 16:15 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
[Cced to automake@gnu.org and bug-automake@gnu.org for further
discussion. Which list is appropriate here?]
automake, is the correct list. This is an automake issue.
Hello!
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues
