Re: make dist fails

Hello Kai, * Kai Sterker wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM CEST: I have a strange problem with the 'make dist' target. I've been using automake 1.10.1 and autoconf 2.62. Updating to 1.10.2 and 2.63 showed exactly the same behavior. Which libltdl version is the one you're using, and

Re: make dist fails

Hello Kai, * Kai Sterker wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:46:29AM CEST: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Can you post your toplevel Makefile.am? Can you also post the output of make dist SHELL=/bin/sh -x with all generated files unchanged? Did configure in a

Re: make dist fails

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: The shell trace shows that this command is called ../adonthell/./install-sh -c -d adonthell-0.4.0-alpha-3/config adonthell-0.4.0-alpha-3/scripts It should create the two directories

[Patch] New target to generate cscope database

I was trying to make Automake generate a rule for creating cscope tags: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnu/0001-New-target-to-generate-cscope-database.patch (also inlined below) I found a discussion involving Jesse Barnes (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2004-07/msg00051.html) which seemed

Re: [Patch] New target to generate cscope database

Hello Debarshi, thank you for your work on this! * Debarshi Ray wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:17:19AM CEST: I was trying to make Automake generate a rule for creating cscope tags: I found a discussion involving Jesse Barnes (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2004-07/msg00051.html)

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

John Calcote john.calc...@gmail.com writes: One thing that bothers me a little is that we never really did solve Gerald's original problem. He said his library was created just fine when he was passing 2:0:0, but when he switched to 2:0:1, it created a library with a version number of 1:1:0.

Extra make rules

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey This is probably in the automake manual but hey. I am wondering is it possible to say in a Makefile.am besides your bin_programs CFLAGS etc... Can you add extra things like a: make check rule - to run the bin_program(s) and grep for a certain

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

On 5/6/2009 3:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: John Calcotejohn.calc...@gmail.com writes: One thing that bothers me a little is that we never really did solve Gerald's original problem. He said his library was created just fine when he was passing 2:0:0, but when he switched to 2:0:1, it

Re: Extra make rules

Hello Philip, * Philip Herron wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:49:50PM CEST: This is probably in the automake manual but hey. I am wondering is it possible to say in a Makefile.am besides your bin_programs CFLAGS etc... Can you add extra things like a: make check rule - to run the

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

Hi John, * John Calcote wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 02:18:10AM CEST: When I said ridiculous cases I really meant bogus triplets. I didn't think there was much you could do about valid triplets that are simply incorrect. I should think that Libtool might fail a build if a bogus triplet

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

As and aside on this whole mess and before I blow my brains out (just kidding, I think) I tried starting the whole mess over and setting the version to 0:0:0 after doing a 'make maintainer-clean'. Well, everything compiled and looked OK when installed in /usr/local/lib libproject.a

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

Hello Gerald, * Gerald I. Evenden wrote on Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:58:28AM CEST: Well, everything compiled and looked OK when installed in /usr/local/lib libproject.a libproject.la libproject.so libproject.so.0 libproject.so.0.0.0 BUT!! Now when I try to recompile any application and