* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:47:24PM CEST:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:23:04AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Intel compiler icc version 7.1 handles the -MF option inconsistently.
[...]
Subsequently, the depcomp 'icc' mode will not be detected correctly
during
automake's depcomp script could be adjusted to recognize the dependency
generation option of the KAI C++/C compiler, version 4.0. Don't know if
this would be useful to people, as the compiler is not developed any
more, but just in case:
| $ KCC --c --output_dependencies deps/bar.baz -c -o
* I wrote on Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:12:27AM CEST:
automake's depcomp script could be adjusted to recognize the dependency
generation option of the KAI C++/C compiler, version 4.0. Don't know if
this would be useful to people, as the compiler is not developed any
more, but just in case:
[
Hi there,
With current CVS automake, 'make distcheck' fails on automake,
because readonly file version.texi in readonly directory
cannot be written to.
I suppose the change from 2003-11-08 caused this, but as I don't
understand all the implications, I won't suggest a fix.
Regards,
Ralf
[ after
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:34:44PM CET:
Ralf == Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf With current CVS automake, 'make distcheck' fails on automake,
On which OS? with which version of Make, sh, etc.?
RedHat 9: linux 2.4.20, GNU make 3.79.1, bash
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:56:41PM CET:
Ralf == Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf A few issues that come to my mind possibly worth
Ralf improving (not the documentation, but Auto{make,conf}
Ralf with this respect) are
Ralf - provide a way
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:03:56AM CET:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Oh, yes, you're right. braino, sorry. This one is not about
not changing the subpackage, but about saving space in the combined
package. After all, auxiliary scripts
The Automake test suite (CVS HEAD version) explicitly looks for
libtool.m4 in aclocaldir and a list of directories specified in the
dirlist file there. Now recent CVS Libtool versions remove libtool.m4
from that location and add it to .../share/libtool/m4/ .
This lead to many SKIPped tests in the
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:57:47PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
*snip*
| Automake, a Libtool or a user problem? Why is there no standard way to
| ask a libtoolize for its corresponding m4 files (at least, one would
| think, newer versions would improve this situation
* joseph speigle wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:56:31AM CEST:
hope this arrives well, if it's too easy such is life. However, I
found a good link for my problem which doesn't work. I want to
statically compile into my final executable a library (libpqxx.a --
the c++ postgresql client
* Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote on Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 12:32:06PM CEST:
I use automake for a project with subdirectories (here a test with a
dummy program). When I change a Makefile.am in a subdirectory, 'make'
cannot rebuild the files because it runs automake with the --gnu
option, which is
* Juha Jäykkä wrote on Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:10:53AM CEST:
Hello! I found the following piece of conversation on how to compile parts
of a program with a non-standard CC. It is from the automake list
archives.
I have exactly the same situation: a set of source files must be compiled
with
* David T Farning wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:41:00AM CEST:
I am unclear as to the difference between LIBADD and LDADD. Diffent
resources seems to say different things.
To make it clear:
Whether to use *_LDADD or *_LIBADD, does not depend on what's to the
right of it (may that be a
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:16:37AM CEST:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Warren Young wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I have learned that using 'rsync' to copy files improves the install time
quite dramatically for repeat installs.
*snip*
Instead of chasing this solution, try
Please reply to list only (I have Mail-Followup-To: set), or at least
use the same message for both replies, so I don't have to reply twice.
Thank you.
* Volker Boerchers wrote on Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:57:35PM CEST:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu
* Thomas Degris wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:18:32AM CEST:
I would like to know how do I install (by default) all the libraries in
$prefix/lib/my_package instead of $prefix/lib.
2 Possibilities:
- Use pkglib_ instead of lib_ (preferred).
- Read up on the nobase_ prefix if your source
* Zhi Qing Wu wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:48:38PM CEST:
I am not very familiar with automake.
Its documentation has grown to be quite readable and understandable.
I need to insert a class into an existing project
(programed by someone else). I only have the the
header file and
* Zhi Qing Wu wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 08:31:51PM CEST:
Thanks for your quick reply. By following your advice,
I did some changes to Makefile.am:
The original Makefile.am:
...
modpermisdir = $(libexecdir)
modpermis_LTLIBRARIES = mod_permis.la
mod_permis_la_SOURCES = mod_permis.cpp
Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes:
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary But for a project built with `make -j', we still need AM_PROG_CC_C_O
Gary and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-(
Seems so. I thought it was not needed because when
AM_PROG_CC_C_O decides
Alvaro Lopez Ortega writes:
I have a little problem with the new automake release. It prints
the following error messages:
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: am__fastdepCC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL
/usr/share/automake-1.9/am/depend2.am: AMDEP does not appear in
* Thomas Degris wrote on Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:35:53PM CEST:
I am using Automake (and autoconf) and libltdl in my package. I would
like to know what is the best way to add a --enable-debug option to my
configure.ac file to compile my package and the libltdl library with
-ggdb3 flag (and
* v p wrote on Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:08:54AM CEST:
Hi Guys,
I have a question. I am using autotools to build my static library.
The way I do it is, I have a Makefile.am as
lib_LIBRARIES = libmylib.a
libmylib_a_SOURCES = xyz.c abc.c etc.
The problem is the number of source files is huge
* Norman Gray wrote on Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:19:21PM CEST:
Is there any way of indicating to automake which language to use when
linking a library?
I'm assembling a (shared) library using convenience libraries:
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la
libfoo_la_SOURCES =
libfoo_la_LIBADD =
* Christian Parpart wrote on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:05:13PM CET:
recently, when I change the Makefile.am, the makefile am doesn't
get regenerated on `make`.
Somebody put AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in configure.ac?
Is this usual, or what could be wrong?
If the above: re-configure with
* Braden McDaniel wrote on Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:00:23AM CET:
I have the following Makefile.am:
docdir = $(datadir)/doc/@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@PACKAGE_VERSION@
EXTRA_DIST = manual
MAINTAINERCLEANFILES = manual/*
html: manual
installdirs-local:
$(mkinstalldirs)
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:49:07AM CET:
There have been questions and even bug reports about this
lately. So here is an attempt to document the difference
between CFLAGS, AM_CFLAGS, and mumble_CFLAGS, how they are
ordered, and how they should be (or not be) used.
* Tom Tromey wrote on Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:41:30AM CET:
Roberto == Roberto Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roberto Can anyone point me to a C++ project that is working with
Roberto precompiled headers and that is doing it with the currently
Roberto available versions of automake and
* Paul Smith wrote on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:25:56PM CET:
%% Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ad Finally, note that you are allowed to ask config.status to perform
ad substitutions on files it doesn't know[1]. In your case, I'm unsure
ad binding the instantiation to configure
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:03:27AM CET:
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:28:17AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
AC_OUTPUT
touch foo.in
./config.status --file foo
why the ``touch''? (./config.status doesn't check the timestamps.)
Oh, that was just copy-n-paste
* Hong Li wrote on Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 12:25:45AM CET:
I am pretty new for Automake, autoconf..
Your question is an Autoconf one, actually.
I have a project and I already have both linux and
Unix verions. Now I wish to have a distribution using
configure tools.
it is pretty easy to go
Hi Robert,
* Robert Collins wrote on Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:35:48PM CET:
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 21:59 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
I am maintainer of a GNOME module called gnome-themes-extras containing
a set of metathemes for the GNOME desktop. After upgrading my
Hi Konstantin,
* Konstantin Osipov wrote on Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:52:28PM CET:
I was playing with 'make ctags' goal of automake, but I couldn't make it
generate a linked tree of tags files, as it happens with emacs-like
`make tags',
The only way to kind-of make all `tags' of the project
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:15:31PM CET:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter. We are all losers with this: you waste your time
writing an answer
* Leonardo Boiko wrote on Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:21:10PM CET:
clean-local:
rm -rf .build
I'm having a similar problem. I want to create a convenience .am file
with rules that many of our packages will use, to be included by
Makefile.am's. I'm already using neat tricks people talked
* Antonio Coralles wrote on Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 12:08:32AM CET:
I'm completley no to automake. Allthough it seems to be a great tool
i've some problems switching a programm I'm writing on from hand-coded
makefiles to GNU-automake. This program is written in c++ and uses the
boost library,
* Antonio Coralles wrote on Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:07:08PM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Antonio Coralles wrote on Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 12:08:32AM CET:
*snip*
`.gnu.linkonce.t
Hi Ed, Ralf,
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 07:39:48AM CET:
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 09:42 -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
Howdy all!
I'm a developer working on netCDF, a freeware library for climate and
Earth scientists. Recently I converted from our old time-honored and
* Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:32:01PM CET:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 05:10 -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
If you believe `man perlrun', some systems do not respect #! and start all
scripts under csh.
Hi Mattias,
* Mattias Barthel wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:50:10PM CET:
I am passing my Makefile.am's from 1.4 to 1.6.
You should try to use a *recent* Automake. Like 1.9.x.
Doing this I have encountered numerous incompatibility problems.
Oh well.
First when starting with 1.4, a
Hi Juan Luis,
* Juan Luis Baptiste wrote on Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:05:06AM CET:
In a first version of the project, all the sources where under a src
directory, so writing a Makefile.am file was fairly trivial and the project
compiled fine. Now, the sources under src have been grouped in
* Juan Luis Baptiste wrote on Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:50:29AM CET:
On Mon 07 Mar 2005 02:46, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Which Automake, g++ versions?
automake 1.6.3
Quite old. Consider using 1.9.x. Should not be a showstopper for this
problem, though.
autoconf 2.59
g++ 3.4.1
source
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:27:34AM CET:
Stepan Kasal wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
foo.c foo.h : $(srcdir)/foo.list $(PARSE_LIST)
$(PARSE_LIST) $(srcdir)/foo.list foo.h foo.c\
|| (rm -f foo.c foo.h ; exit 1)
Hi Ben,
* Ben Elliston wrote on Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:41:46AM CET:
I approached the Libtool maintainers with this request, who convinced
me that Automake was the right place to implement this. I would like
Automake-generated Makefiles to pass --quiet to libtool when make is
invoked with
* Baurjan Ismagulov wrote on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:39:58AM CET:
One more question: how do I define that make alone should build zzz,
and test1..testn should be built only when I do make check?
Put them in check_PROGRAMS.
Regards,
Ralf
Hi Matthias,
Please Cc: the automake list on replies, so others can help as well.
* Mattias Barthel wrote on Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:56:50AM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Mattias Barthel wrote on Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 06:50:10PM CET:
I am passing my Makefile.am's from 1.4 to 1.6.
You
Hi Rohnny,
* Rohnny Moland wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:46:13PM CET:
I am trying to include my own local m4 macros to a project. In the automake
documentation I read that the preferred way to do this would be to add the
following line to the Makefile.am file:
ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:40:01PM CET:
recently, I run make uninstall with a package I previously installed
by make install.
The package heavily uses the feature
foodir = ...
foo_HEADERS = ...
and thus created many directories. After the
Hi Guillaume,
* Guillaume Rousse wrote on Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 01:26:32PM CET:
[ how to encode /etc ]
So, am I supposed to use the sysconfdir macro, and have my configuration
files installated in logical but unusual places by manual installation,
or hardcode '/etc' path instead in my own
* Simon Perreault wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 06:13:19PM CEST:
On March 30, 2005 10:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
#include ../include/inc.h
which is not portable, by the way (but I can see if you don't care about
that part of the world).
Why do you say that? That code is being ported
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 08:24:45AM CEST:
Kevin Teich wrote:
I would like to add a target to our source tree that only installs
certain files such 'make install' will install everything normally, but
'make release' will only install certain files.
I would be
[ sorry for the cross-post, this concerns both tools ]
SUSv3 states that `make' should update prerequisites to a target in the
order in which they are given. However, I cannot find any reference to
whether the resulting tree of out-of-date targets is traversed
depth-first or breadth-first. Do
Hi Ruediger,
* Ruediger Ranft wrote on Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:04:17AM CEST:
currently I have a project where some C sources are automaticly
generated by other programms during the build stage. So I added some
rules like
foo.c foo.h : foo.othersouce
foocompiler
Hi Mike,
* Mike Heffner wrote on Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:39:13PM CEST:
lib_LTLIBRARIES=
noinst_LTLIBRARIES=
if FOO_STANDALONE
lib_LTLIBRARIES+=libfoo.la
else
noinst_LTLIBRARIES+=libfoo.la
endif
Hmm, this works over here.
I should have looked right away, sorry.
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:35:35AM CEST:
* Mike Heffner wrote on Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:39:13PM CEST:
if FOO_STANDALONE
lib_LTLIBRARIES+=libfoo.la
else
noinst_LTLIBRARIES+=libfoo.la
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:12:41PM CEST:
Stan Guillory wrote:
2) Is there a way to force automake to set the depmode to makedepend?
What happens if you run
make CCDEPMODE=depmode=makedepend CXXDEPMODE=depmode=makedepend
?
The answer to this question is
[ CC to automake because it is involved -- see below ]
Have been thinking a little about speeding up compile mode.
Unfortunately, there is no trivial trick like for link mode when
what you do is compile thousands of tiny translation units -- the large
constant involved with slow shell script
* Stan Guillory wrote on Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:56:17PM CEST:
1) Should the dependency tracking mechanism in automake work by default
with Sun Forte C++ 5.4?
I only have access to a different compiler version. What does yours do
after this series of commands (in a junk directory):
mkdir a
Hi Stan,
Please try to answer below the text you refer to, thanks.
* Stan Guillory wrote on Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:14:38PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/13/2005 10:41:11 AM
* Stan Guillory wrote on Thu, May 12, 2005 at 07:56:17PM CEST:
1) Should the dependency tracking
Hi Bob, Scott,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:08:52PM CEST:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Scott Kruger wrote:
As someone who is just getting started in the whole GNU autotools world,
I think keeping libtool outside of automake is one of the things that
make it difficult to learn
Hi Fred,
Sorry for the late answer, I overlooked your message earlier.
I hope it's still of value to you.
* Fred Proctor wrote on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:21:46PM CEST:
I have code in some subdirectories, say src/{bottom,middle,top}, which
when compiled yields libraries that I want copied up
* Irek Szczesniak wrote on Sun, May 22, 2005 at 04:49:11AM CEST:
In my configure.in the AC_OUTPUT macro produces the fsclien.sh script.
This script does not get installed. I want this file to have the
executable permission set. The file fsclient.sh.in has the right
permissions, but
Hi Mark,
* Mark Brand wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:41:58PM CEST:
to my situation, but I'm getting stuck. I have:
configure.ac
if test x$target_os == xmingw32; then
Don't use the test operator `==' , it's unportable and completely
superfluous, as `=' does string comparison just fine.
Hi Jirko, Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:44:48AM CEST:
Regarding your macro MY_CXX_OPTION, if you want to be really portable,
things can get even more scary.
This thread[1] contains a couple more hints. :)
I think the definition of your macro can be improved.
Hi Jirka,
* Jirka Hanika wrote on Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 10:12:18PM CEST:
I've decided to send one more piece of reaction directly to you, because it
doesn't belong to the automake list anymore and it might confuse the
AC_COMPILER_OPTION thread on the autoconf list unless verbosely
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:12:45PM CEST:
Now I want to integrate several project into the build system. The
directory hierarchy looks like this:
doc
drv
drv/d1
drv/d2
lib
lib/l1
lib/l2
src1
src2
d1, d2, l1, l2, src1, src2 are existing
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:14:03AM CEST:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
But I have another problem with SUBDIRS. As I mentioned in the previous
thread, specifying -j starts building of l1 and src1 in parallel. l1
lasts longer, and src1 fails due to missing
Hi there,
It is not possible to override an internal suffix rule within an
Automake conditional. Automake puts the conditional marker only on the
first line of the self-output rule.
Regards,
Ralf
touch foo.c
cat configure.ac EOF
AC_INIT(a,1,b)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(foreign)
AC_PROG_CC
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:23:58PM CEST:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
ECANNOTREPRODUCE. Which GNU make version?
Over here GNU make-3.80 does _not_ parallelize across SUBDIRs.
I am using GNU make 3.80 on Solaris and FreeBSD, but the version
delivered
* Steven G. Johnson wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:20:55PM CEST:
Is there some reason why the automake Fortran 9x support does not use
the AC_FC_SRCEXT macro to determine whether extra flags are needed to
compile files with .f90 or .f95 extensions?
*snip*
PS. This would also give you a
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:09:05PM CEST:
If I have some tests, and want to run them with command line options,
how do I do it?
You are using the Automake builtin support for tests. It's quite
limited, and I believe it cannot do what you want.
For example, I have
Hi Patrick,
* Patrick Scheibe * SMC Trust wrote on Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:20:56AM CEST:
Is it possible to have a directory style like
Root/
|
+--Linux
|
+MSW
|
+src
and to have all the autoconf, automake stuff in the Linux dir?
First: What exactly is the
* Roger Leigh wrote on Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 12:47:08PM CEST:
In a simple Makefile.am:
pamdir = /etc/pam.d
pam_DATA = schroot
EXTRA_DIST = $(pam_DATA)
make distcheck fails:
Make that
pamdir = $(prefix)/etc/pam.d
but you really should be using sysconfdir:
pamdir =
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:11:05AM CEST:
Ed Hartnett wrote:
check_PROGRAMS = tst_parallel
TESTS = run_par_test.sh
Where run_par_test.sh is:
MP_TASKS_PER_NODE=4 MP_PROCS=4 poe ./tst_parallel
Since Automake is based on Perl it should be pretty easy to do
Hi Roger,
* Roger Leigh wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:11:10AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Roger Leigh wrote on Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 12:47:08PM CEST:
pamdir = /etc/pam.d
pam_DATA = schroot
EXTRA_DIST = $(pam_DATA)
make distcheck fails:
Make
Hi Thomas,
* Roesner Thomas wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:47:47AM CEST:
lib_LIBRARIES = libavstd.a libavpcl.a
libsources = avbed.c avpub.c
libavstd_a_SOURCES = $(libsources)
libavstd_a_CPPFLAGS = -DNORMAL $(AM_CPPFLAGS)
libavpcl_a_SOURCES = $(libsources)
libavpcl_a_CPPFLAGS
* John Ling wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:38:03PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* John Ling wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:34:03AM CEST:
Hello, I was wondering if it is possible to do post-install work on the
install header directory after an install using some sort of target?
I
Hi
* SummoneR wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:14:40PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* SummoneR wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:40:30PM CEST:
And if I continue with make make install and finally try to build
Boinc:
Bootstrapping configure script and makefiles:
automake
Hi Jeffrey,
* Jeffrey Sheinberg wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:27:35AM CEST:
I intended to put some local macros into the m4/ directory. These
macros would be needed for the ./configure script to work,
therefore they need to be included into the dist tarball.
But your m4 directory is
Hi Ed, David,
* David Fang wrote on Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 07:23:15PM CEST:
I recently started seeing the following problem doing a make distclean:
rm -rf ../libsrc/.deps ./.deps
(Autotools amateur here, so please correct me nicely if I'm wrong!
:) ) I'd say the above line is the
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:59:36PM CEST:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
d1, d2, l1, l2, src1, src2 are existing projects with Makefile or
configure.ac / Makefile.am. I want to leave them as they are and write
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:46:53PM CEST:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hmm. I don't know whether AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS can give you the
flexibility you want here. If you unconditionally build both packages
* overbored wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:44:38AM CEST:
Thus spake Ralf Wildenhues on 6/30/2005 7:23 AM:
Quoting the manual:
| `nostdinc'
| This option can be used to disable the standard `-I' options which
| are ordinarily automatically provided by Automake.
It's
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:13:09PM CEST:
The macro has two uses:
1) in GNU make's configure.in
2) in Automake's AM_PROG_CC_C_O
How do you know nobody else uses it? It's published.
If yes, shouldn't we introduce a generalized macro, for example
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:20:22PM CEST:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:13:09PM CEST:
The macro has two uses:
1) in GNU make's configure.in
2) in Automake's AM_PROG_CC_C_O
How do
* overbored wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:53:22PM CEST:
* overbored wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:44:38AM CEST:
Thus spake Ralf Wildenhues on 6/30/2005 7:23 AM:
| `nostdinc'
| This option can be used to disable the standard `-I' options which
| are ordinarily automatically
Hi Jeremy,
* Jeremy C. Reed wrote on Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:58:43PM CEST:
nobase_include_HEADERS = histedit.h editline/readline.h
The Makefile.in (generated by automake 1.9.5) does:
nobase_include_HEADERS = histedit.h editline/readline.h
...
install-nobase_includeHEADERS:
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 07:28:38PM CEST:
I have a slew of test programs, and my Makefile.am contains something
like this:
# These programs are all built for make check in this directory.
check_PROGRAMS = tst_nc_converts tst_h_files tst_h_atts tst_h_vars \
#
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:46:48AM CEST:
Ralf == Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf * Jeremy C. Reed wrote on Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:58:43PM CEST:
nobase_include_HEADERS = histedit.h editline/readline.h
Should it also
Hi Thomas,
* Thomas Degris wrote on Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:26:43PM CEST:
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libtoto.la
BUILD_SOURCE = src/toto01.cxx
^ ^^
dist_libtoto_la_SOURCES = src/toto.stc
libtoto_la_SOURCES =src/toto01.cxx src/toto02.cxx src/toto.cpp
src/toto01.cxx: src/toto.stc
Hi James,
* James Laird wrote on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:40:16PM CEST:
Since all of the tests include the main library (using LDADD), they all
depend on that library. Thus, when the main library is changed, all of
the tests must be recompiled.
It would be nice if, when the library is
Hi Adrian,
* Adrian Bunk wrote on Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:42:13PM CEST:
I have the following Makefile.am:
-- snip --
secondbindir = $(prefix)/bin2
bin_PROGRAMS = test1
secondbin_PROGRAMS = test2
install-exec-hook:
cd $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) ln -fs test1 test11
cd
A long-standing issue in Automake: Fixing the ordering issue of
make install and maybe also parallel make install when shared
(in the context of Automake: libtool-created) libraries are in use.
First some history (please post more links if you find additional
useful bits of information):
Nice
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:06:02AM CEST:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:38:32AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
well, first you read in the autoconf manual:
| test ${var+set} = set || var='${indirection}'
(aren't there, by the way, superfluous quotes
Hi Harald,
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:39:46PM CEST:
I would need some way to add recursive targets to all generated
Makefiles, without asking every owner of every Makefile.am
to append some include statement or some keyword to be replaced
by AC_SUBST_FILE.
Hmm. I
Hi Joshua,
* Joshua Moore-Oliva wrote on Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:00:22AM CEST:
I have two files, cspm.lex and cspm.y that due to circumstances out of
my control need special processing. The only way I could get them
into the package without automake automatically processing them was by
using
Hi Harald,
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:15:57AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:39:46PM CEST:
I would need some way to add recursive targets to all generated
Makefiles, without asking every owner of every Makefile.am
Hi Kendrick,
* Kendrick Smith wrote on Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:46:07PM CEST:
Can anyone tell me why an Automake-generated Makefile
would rerun the 'configure' script when 'make' is invoked,
and whether there's a (possibly heavy-handed) way to disable
this behavior?
Usually,
Hi Harlan,
* Harlan Stenn wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:12:43AM CEST:
I have 2 auto* packages, and one subdir (sntp/) is a subpackage of the parent.
I'm using autoconf 2.59 and automake 1.9.6.
I see this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep '^top_srcdir' A.pogo/sntp/Makefile
Hi Sam,
* Adams Samuel D Contr AFRL/HEDR wrote on Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:22:25PM CEST:
I am writing a new program in C++ as it can use complex numbers and C does
not have that functionality, but I am also trying to use a C library that I
wrote before for another program that handles all of
Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Ellwood wrote on Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:16:15AM CEST:
Im currently writing a fairly nifty software project that makes use of GNU
autotools extensively, although in a very basic way. My aim is to create a
package manager in the style of RPM via automake. Im aiming to
1 - 100 of 3140 matches
Mail list logo
